LAX97LA199

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 172N · El Monte, CA · May 7, 1997

Accident · No injuriesLimited investigationFinal report
Date
May 7, 1997, 13:38 local (20:38 UTC)
Place
El Monte, CA
Injuries
1 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Takeoff
Aircraft
N6469DCessna 172N
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report December 31, 1998
Report
Approved by Office Director
FAA report
19970507039819A
Case key
29802

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

the student pilot's misunderstanding of the controller's clearance during an aborted touch-and-go landing.

Sequence of events

NTSB’s coding before 2008: each occurrence and phase of flight, and the causes and factors under it. The codes are defined in NTSB’s coding manual.

OverrunTakeoff - aborted
Atc clearance - not understoodPilot in commandCause
Touch-and-go - abortedPilot in commandCause
On ground/water collision with objectTakeoff - aborted
Object - fence

Analysis

The student pilot reported that he had been practicing full stop landings after his previous three approaches. Following a 'cleared for the option' clearance, he elected to perform a touch-and-go landing. The student stated that it had taken a little longer for the airplane to touch down and begin the landing roll on the ground. He then applied full power and raised the flaps. The student stated that he thought the tower controller told him to get off the active runway immediately. He believed he had enough runway to stop, so he reduced power and attempted to stop the aircraft, but was unable before colliding with the perimeter fence. According to a recording of the communications, the controller advised the student to make a left turn off the runway when able, because there was an aircraft on short final.

Factual narrative

On May 7, 1997, at 1338 hours Pacific daylight time, a Cessna 172N, N6469D, was substantially damaged when the student pilot aborted takeoff, veered off to the right of the departure end of runway 19, and collided with the airport perimeter fence at the El Monte, California, airport. The aircraft was operated by Valley Flight Center of El Monte, and was on a local solo instructional flight. The student pilot, the sole occupant, was not injured. The flight departed El Monte for the student's first supervised solo in the traffic pattern and was scheduled to terminate at that airport.

The student pilot reported that he had been practicing full stop landings. Following a "cleared for the option" clearance from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) air traffic control tower, on the accident landing the student elected to perform a touch-and-go landing. The pilot stated that it had taken a little longer for the airplane to touch down and begin the landing roll on the ground. He then applied full power and raised the flaps. The student pilot stated that he heard the tower controller ask him to clear the active runway. The pilot reported that he believed he had enough runway to abort the takeoff and then reduce power. He attempted to stop the aircraft, but was unable to prior to colliding with the perimeter fence.

A certified re-recording of air-ground voice communications tape was reviewed by the Safety Board. According to the tape, the controller had cleared the student pilot for landing with the touch-and-go option. The student pilot landed and the controller asked him to turn left when able and depart the active runway for an aircraft on short final.

According to the student pilot's flight instructor, the student had made three full stop landings. On the last landing, the student pilot elected to perform a touch-and-go. The flight instructor, who reviewed the communications tapes, reported that the tower controller advised the student pilot to make a left turn off the runway when able due to traffic on short final. The student pilot thought that the controller had asked him to clear the active immediately due to landing traffic on short final.

An FAA inspector from the Los Angeles, California, Flight Standards District Office, stated that no pre-existing anomalies were noted with the aircraft.

The accident was reported to the Safety Board on June 3, 1997, after substantial damage to the aircraft was confirmed.

Aircraft

Registration
N6469D
Reported as
Cessna 172N
Category
Airplane
Serial number
17272820
Airframe hours
5,792
Engine
Lycoming O-320-H2AD, 160 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Operator
Valley Flight Center
Registered owner
Joel Marks
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
100 hour · February 25, 1997
Departed
EMT · CA
Airport
EMT · El Monte, runway 19, 3,995 × 75 ft, asphalt

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
34
Certificate
Student
Medical
Class 3, Valid Medical--no waivers/lim.
Seat
Left
Flight hours
66 total · 50 in this make and model · 2 as pilot in command · 20 in the last 90 days · 10 in the last 30 days

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
210° at 8 knots
Visibility
7 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Altimeter
29.00 inHg
Observed at
EMT

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.