MIA67D0526

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 140 · Pisgah, AL · May 23, 1967

Accident · No injuriesClosed
Date
May 23, 1967
Place
Pisgah, AL · PISGAH, AL
Injuries
2 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Taxi
Aircraft
N76885Cessna 140
Status
Completed · report September 18, 1967
Report
Brief approved by the director
Case key
116444

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

NTSB brief

NTSB’s brief of the accident, as it was printed: the coded facts, with the probable cause and factors.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 FILE    DATE          LOCATION          AIRCRAFT DATA       INJURIES       FLIGHT                        PILOT DATA
                                                               F  S M/N     PURPOSE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3-1672  67/5/23    PISGAH, ALA         CESSNA 140          CR-  0  0  1  NONCOMMERCIAL             PRIVATE, AGE 22, 138
        TIME - 1645                    N76885              PX-  0  0  1  PLEASURE/PERSONAL TRANSP  TOTAL HOURS, 70 IN TYPE,
                                       DAMAGE-SUBSTANTIAL  OT-  0  0  0                            NOT INSTRUMENT RATED.
        TYPE OF ACCIDENT                                         PHASE OF OPERATION
           COLLIDED WITH: DITCHES                                   TAXI: OTHER
           NOSE OVER/DOWN                                           TAXI: OTHER
        PROBABLE CAUSE(S)
           PILOT IN COMMAND - SELECTED UNSUITABLE TERRAIN
        FACTOR(S)
           TERRAIN - ROUGH/UNEVEN
        REMARKS- PLT WAS CHECKING ADEQUACY OF FIELD FOR TAKEOFF. EARLIER PRECAUTIONARY LNDG.

Aircraft

Registration
N76885
Reported as
Cessna 140
Category
Airplane
Engine
reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.