- Date
- July 15, 1998, 11:55 local (16:55 UTC)
- Place
- Panama City Bch, FL
- Injuries
- 1 fatal
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Phase of flight
- Other
- Aircraft
- N3549JCessna 150E
- Weather
- Visual (VMC) · Day
- Status
- Completed · report February 15, 2001
- Report
- Approved by Office Director
- FAA report
- 19980715023609A
- Case key
- 43195
From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.
On this page
Probable cause
The NTSB’s determination of the probable cause, and any contributing factors.
The failure of the pilot to maintain airspeed (Vs) and the inadvertent stall by the pilot. Contributing to the accident was the intentional operation of the airplane by the pilot in an over gross weight condition resulting in a higher stall speed, and failure of maintenance personnel to install the engine driven fuel pump and the improper wiring of the auxiliary fuel pump contrary to the STC installation instructions 20 years and 6 months earlier. Also contributing was the inadequate annual inspection of the airplane by other maintenance personnel for failure to note that the engine did not have an engine driven fuel pump installed.
Analysis
The pilot made a successful hook but during the climb, a witness did not hear the engine rpm increase. The pilot dropped the banner and continued climbing then banked initially to the right. The flight climbed to an estimated height of 300 feet then the pilot began a left turn to return to the airport. During the turn, the angle of bank increased and the airplane then pitched nose down, and impacted the ground about 1,400 feet from the approach end of the south runway. Examination of the flight controls revealed no evidence of preimpact failure or malfunction. The fuse for the auxiliary fuel pump was blown; however, no determination was made as to the reason for the blown fuse. The engine was placed in a test stand where it was found to operate normally. Visual examination of the carburetor revealed no evidence of preimpact failure or malfunction. The engine which was installed into the airplane 20 years and 6 months earlier in accordance with a STC, did not contain an engine driven fuel pump as required. Additionally, the auxiliary fuel pump was determined to be wired into a circuit that was not depicted by the installation instructions.
Factual narrative
The factual narrative1,314 words
History of flight
On July 15, 1998, about 1155 central daylight time, a Cessna 150E, N3549J, registered to Bay Banners, Inc., experienced an in-flight loss of control and crashed shortly after takeoff from a private airstrip near Panama City Beach, Florida. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and no flight plan was filed for the 14 CFR Part 91 banner towing flight. The airplane was substantially damaged and the commercial-rated pilot, the sole occupant, was fatally injured. The flight originated from the airstrip about 5 minutes earlier.
According to the president of the operator, the day before the accident the pilot complained of a battery charging problem in the accident airplane. Both he and the pilot checked the engine and discovered that the bracket that secured the alternator to the engine "needed work." The day of the accident, both he and the pilot removed a bracket from another airplane and installed it in the accident airplane. The pilot installed the engine cowling and before departure, added a total of 27.2 gallons of automotive fuel to the fuel tanks, as documented by the fuel truck meter sheet. According to a ground crewmember of the operator, it was the pilot's first banner of the day and he heard the pilot start the engine and observed the pilot taxi to the runway but did not or could not hear the pilot perform an engine run-up before takeoff. The flight departed then circled the airport to return to pick up the banner. The pilot picked up the banner, but immediately dropped it when the lead pole was 3 feet off the ground. The ground crewmember did not hear a change in engine sound during the climb and heard the pilot report that he was returning to the field. Another company pilot who was airborne at the time and located about 1.5 miles from the crash site observed the airplane climb to about 300-350 feet agl without the banner. The airplane was observed banking to the right about 20 degrees from the runway heading then observed the airplane in a 30-degree angle of bank to the left. At the point where the witness thought the pilot should roll out of the bank to align the airplane with the extended runway centerline, the airplane rolled further to the left then began to spin to the left. He and the ground crewmember then lost sight of the airplane due to obstructions.
Personnel information
Review of the pilot's records revealed that he had received 16.3 hours of banner tow training between May 9 through May 15, 1998, at an airport located in Bunnell, Florida. The operator of the airplane stated that the accident pilot returned to his facility after receiving the training but his insurance company required additional training. The pilot's logbook indicates that on June 8, 1998, he received an additional 4.2 hours of flight training on two separate flights. The first flight lasting 1.6 hours included 10 pickups with 20, 5-foot letters; and the second flight lasting 2.6 hours, included 15 pickups with 20, 5-foot letters. The pilot's logbook then indicates that he received a checkout by the operator on June 17, 1998, on a flight that lasted 1 hour. The paperwork provided by the operator indicates that the pilot began towing banners for his company on June 19, 1998. Since that date the pilot had accumulated about 128 hours towing banners, in the same make and model airplane. The pilot was authorized to tow a banner that contained up to 55, 5 foot-tall letters. The accident banner contained 38 letters.
The pilot had a known allergy to peanut butter which according to the pilot's wife, included an upper respiratory reaction. According to the president of the operator, between 0900 and 1100 on the day of the accident, the pilot had eaten an unknown number of cheese and peanut butter crackers that was provided by him personally.
According to FAA records, the pilot and the president of the operator were not certificated airframe and/or powerplant mechanics. Additional information pertaining to the pilot is contained on page 2 of the Factual Report Aviation.
Aircraft information
Review of the maintenance records revealed that the airplane was modified in January 1978, with the installation of a Lycoming O-320-E2D, engine, in accordance with a Supplemental Type Certificate, STC SA750CE. According to the installation instructions, an auxiliary fuel pump and an engine driven fuel pump were required to be installed; the engine did not have an engine-driven fuel pump. Additionally, as the airplane was not previously equipped with an auxiliary fuel pump, the fuel pump was required to be wired into the dome light circuit, with a 10-amp fuse. According to the modified aircraft owner's manual, the auxiliary fuel pump was required to be on for takeoff and climb. The engine that was installed at the time of the accident was the same by serial number that was installed in accordance with the STC in 1978. Review of the engine logbook revealed that the engine was overhauled on February 7, 1997, and signed off for approval for return to service by a A&P-rated mechanic. That same mechanic had signed off the last annual inspection on June 22, 1998. Additionally, the mechanic had, as documented by two Major Repair and Alteration Forms (FAA Form 337), modified two other Cessna 150 airplanes in accordance with STC SA750CE, which were being operated at the time of the accident, by the same operator. The airplane operator at the time of the accident was operating a total of 5, including the accident airplane, Cessna 150s with the 150-horsepower engine installed. Four of the five airplanes had an engine-driven fuel pump installed.
Additionally, review of the maintenance records indicate that the airframe and engine were modified in accordance with two separate (STC's) to allow the use of automotive fuel. The listed STC was for several engine models, none of which were installed when the STC was accomplished. An STC to allow the use of automotive fuel is available for the engine that was installed at the time of the accident. The airplane was equipped with long range fuel tanks that had a total capacity of 38 gallons.
The engine that was installed in the airplane at the time of the accident was originally sent to the Cessna Aircraft Company in late 1972, and installed in a Cessna 172M, with the registration number of N20586. According to personnel from the Cessna Aircraft Company, the engine in a Cessna 172M did not have an engine-driven fuel pump installed. Additional information pertaining to the accident aircraft is contained on page 2 of the Factual Report-Aviation.
Meteorological information
Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. Additional information pertaining to weather is contained in the weather information blocks on pages 3 and 4 of the Factual Report-Aviation.
Wreckage and impact information
The crash site was located about 1,400 feet from the departure end of the runway in a wooded area that contained trees and brush. The airplane came to rest on a magnetic heading of 030 degrees with all components necessary to sustain flight. The leading edge of the left wing exhibited evidence of chordwise crushing and the leading edge of the right wing exhibited evidence of a tree impact. The leading edge of the right wing was twisted down about 90 degrees. Examination of the elevator and rudder flight control cables revealed no evidence of preimpact failure or malfunction. Examination of the flap and left aileron control cables revealed that the down aileron cable and the flap cables were failed due to overload. The rear spar of the left wing was observed to be displaced. The flaps were determined to be extended about 10 degrees and no tow cables were connected at the tow hitch. Two each tow cables were observed outside the cockpit near the pilot's door. The airplane wit
Sequence of events
NTSB’s coding before 2008: each occurrence and phase of flight, and the causes and factors under it. The codes are defined in NTSB’s coding manual.
Aircraft
- Registration
- N3549J
- Reported as
- Cessna 150E
- Category
- Airplane
- Serial number
- 15061249
- Airframe hours
- 10,840
- Engine
- Lycoming O-320-E2D, 150 horsepower, reciprocating
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Part 91
- Registered owner
- Bay Banners, Inc.
- Airworthiness certificate
- Special, Restricted (Special)
- Last inspection
- Annual · June 22, 1998 · 91 hours before
- Departed
- FA07
- Airport
- FA07 · Panama City Bch Airstrip, runway 36, 960 × 50 ft, grass/turf
Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.
Flight crew
As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.
- Role
- Pilot
- Age
- 26
- Certificate
- Commercial
- Airplane ratings
- Single-engine land, Multi-engine land
- Instrument ratings
- Airplane
- Medical
- Class 1, Valid Medical--w/ waivers/lim
- Seat
- Left
- Toxicology
- Performed
- Flight hours
- 434 total · 130 in this make and model · 366 as pilot in command · 163 in the last 90 days · 130 in the last 30 days · 5 in the last 24 hours
Weather
- Conditions
- Visual (VMC) · Day
- Wind
- 340° at 5 knots
- Visibility
- 10 statute miles
- Lowest ceiling
- None
- Temperature
- 91 °F, dew point 72 °F
- Altimeter
- 29.00 inHg
- Observed at
- PFN, 7 nm away
FAA reports on this event · 1
The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.
Other investigations on N3549J · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.