MIA99LA019

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 152 · Douglasville, GA · October 28, 1998

Accident · Minor injuriesLimited investigationFinal report
Date
October 28, 1998, 08:55 local (13:55 UTC)
Place
Douglasville, GA
Injuries
1 minor, 1 uninjured
Damage
Destroyed
Phase of flight
Maneuvering
Aircraft
N25037Cessna 152
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report February 16, 2001
Report
Approved by Office Director
FAA report
19981028039839A
Case key
45172

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

Failure of the no. 1 cylinder exhaust valve guide due to erosion, which resulted in separation of the exhaust valve head, loss of engine power, and collision with a power pole during a forced landing on unsuitable terrain.

Sequence of events

NTSB’s coding before 2008: each occurrence and phase of flight, and the causes and factors under it. The codes are defined in NTSB’s coding manual.

Loss of engine power(total) - mech failure/malfManeuvering
Engine assembly,valve,exhaust - erodedCause
Engine assembly,valve,exhaust - failure,partialCause
Engine assembly,valve,exhaust - failure,total
Forced landingEmergency descent/landing
In flight collision with objectEmergency descent/landing
Object - utility pole
In flight collision with terrain/waterDescent - uncontrolled
Terrain condition - loose objects

Analysis

The engine lost power and while making a forced landing in a field the aircraft collided with a power pole and then crashed on top of a pile of railroad ties. Postcrash examination of the engine showed the no. 1 exhaust valve guide and valve stem were eroded, the valve guide had partially separated due to progressive cracking, and the valve head had separated from the stem. The reason for the valve stem and guide erosion was not determined. The engine had accumulated 2,225 flight hours since the last major overhaul, at which time the valves and valve guides were replaced with new parts. The recommended overhaul interval for the engine is 2,400 flight hours.

Factual narrative

On October 28, 1998, about 0855 eastern standard time, a Cessna 152, N25037, registered to Gause Aviation Services, Inc., crashed while making a forced landing following engine failure, near Douglasville, Georgia, while on a Title 14 CFR Part 91 instructional flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and no flight plan was filed. The aircraft was destroyed and the commercial-rated flight instructor received minor injuries. Theand student pilot were not injured. The flight originated from Palmetto, Georgia, the same day, about 0830.

The instructor stated that while making a 360-degree turn at 2,300-2,500 feet, the engine lost power and did not respond to throttle movement. He informed his student that they had an engine failure and took control of the aircraft . He turned toward a field for landing. Attempts to regain engine power were unsuccessful. As they approached the selected landing field, they were high and he executed a 360-degree turn to lose altitude. After the turn they were still high, and he lowered full flaps and slipped the aircraft to get down. He then executed a slow 180-degree turn and the aircraft collided with a power pole at the edge of the field. The aircraft then descended and crashed on a pile of railroad ties lying in the field.

Postcrash examination of the engine was performed by a FAA inspector. Examination showed the No. 1 cylinder exhaust valve had failed. No other precrash failures or malfunctions were reported. (See attached Inspector Statement)

Examination of the failed No. 1 cylinder and the No. 1 cylinder exhaust valve was performed by the NTSB Materials Laboratory, Washington, D.C. Examination showed the No. 1 exhaust valve was separated at the neck, and the head was found imbedded in the cylinder, adjacent to the seat for the exhaust valve. The No. 1 piston had damage from impact with the separated exhaust valve head. The intake valve and guide were intact. A portion of the exhaust valve guide had separated at the valve port end and was not located. Circumferential erosion was present on the exhaust valve stem corresponding to the area of the missing portion of the valve guide. The fracture surface of the exhaust valve guide had features suggestive of progressive cracking. The inside diameter of the exhaust valve guide was larger than specifications due to erosion damage. The reason for the erosion could not be determined. (See attached NTSB Material Laboratory Factual Report)

Aircraft and engine logbook records show the engine was last overhauled on March 10, 1992, and had accumulated about 2,225 flight hours since this overhaul. Lycoming Engines recommends the O-235-L2C engine be overhauled after 2,400 flight hours. Records show that during the 1992 overhaul, the exhaust valve guides and exhaust valves were replaced with new parts. (See attached logbook records)

Aircraft

Registration
N25037
Reported as
Cessna 152
Category
Airplane
Serial number
15280510
Airframe hours
7,107
Engine
Lycoming O-235-L2C, 110 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Destroyed
Fire
On-Ground
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Registered owner
Gause Aviation Services, Inc.
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Utility; Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · July 13, 1998 · 82 hours before
Departed
89A · Palmetto, GA

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
39
Certificates
Commercial, Flight instructor
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land, Multi-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 2, Valid Medical--no waivers/lim.
Seat
Right
Flight hours
780 total · 500 in this make and model · 70 in the last 90 days

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
270° at 5 knots
Visibility
7 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
64 °F, dew point 48 °F
Altimeter
30.00 inHg
Observed at
ATL, 15 nm away

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.