MIA99LA134

NTSB accident investigation · Durrwachter Wittman Tailwind · Dover, TN · April 19, 1999

Accident · Serious injuriesLimited investigationFinal report
Date
April 19, 1999, 10:30 local (15:30 UTC)
Place
Dover, TN
Injuries
2 serious
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Takeoff
Aircraft
N1194KDurrwachter Wittman Tailwind
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report June 22, 2000
Report
Approved by Office Director
FAA report
19990419003729A
Case key
46145

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

A loss of engine power for undetermined reasons

Sequence of events

NTSB’s coding before 2008: each occurrence and phase of flight, and the causes and factors under it. The codes are defined in NTSB’s coding manual.

Loss of engine powerTakeoff
Reason for occurrence undetermined
Forced landingEmergency descent/landing
In flight collision with terrain/waterEmergency landing
Terrain condition - high vegetation

Analysis

Witnesses saw the homebuilt airplane takeoff and attain an altitude of about 200 feet agl, appear to lose power, and attempt a descending left turn toward the runway. The witnesses heard the engine 'popping', before the airplane crashed into a pasture short of the runway. Postcrash inspection of the wreckage by FAA inspectors revealed the presence of uncontaminated automotive fuel, control path continuity in all three axis, and no airframe abnormalities. Subsequent removal and functional test of the automotive engine revealed no abnormalities.

Factual narrative

On April 19, 1999, about 1030 central daylight time, an experimental Durrwachter Wittman Tailwind W-10, N1194K, registered to a private individual, operating as a Title 14 CFR Part 91 personal flight, crashed on takeoff climb from a private grass airstrip about 5 miles east of Dover, Tennessee. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed. The airplane received substantial damage and the commercially-rated pilot and a passenger received serious injuries. The flight originated from the airport about 5 minutes before the accident.

According to an eyewitness, one of the pilot's sons who was videotaping the flight, he heard a "popping" sound and it appeared as if the airplane lost power and crashed in a pasture. He stated that he ran over to the crash and disabled the electric fuel pump that was gushing fuel from a broken fitting. He stated the aircraft was actually based at Humphrey's County Airport, Waverly, Tennessee, and his father was demonstrating the newly completed airplane to his sons.

Another eyewitness stated the aircraft was about 200 feet agl, in a takeoff climb when it appeared to lose power and commence a descending left turn. He said he thought the pilot had a problem and was trying to make it back to the runway and didn't quite make it. He made his way over to the crash site and extricated the two occupants. He stated there was a strong fuel smell and he could hear something continue to operate.

According to FAA inspectors, postcrash examination of the aircraft and accident site revealed the site smelled heavily of automotive fuel, and the airplane's fuel filter contained uncontaminated fuel. Flight control path continuity in all axes appeared intact and functional. The engine was a Subaru automotive 2.2 liter displacement, 4-cylinder inline configuration utilizing liquid cooling, electronic ignition and electronic fuel injection.

Subsequent engine removal and remounting to a specially made engine stand by an FAA inspector/ Subaru automotive technician produced an immediate start and smooth operation for six successive starts and shutdowns. Because the airplane installation used a specially designed radiator that was destroyed in the crash, the test runs were conducted without liquid cooling and were time limited. To simulate conductive and advection heating of all peripheral components by the core engine as would occur in airborne operation, a heat gun was used on the components, and especially the electronic modules, to heat their integrated circuits to high operating temperatures. The engine was run to near maximum power with no abnormalities noted. Because the boost pump, ignition, and fuel injection systems were electronically controlled and powered, all circuits were tested for security of connections and specified volts and amperes. The alternator output was checked and produced a steady 12 volts.

Aircraft

Registration
N1194K
Reported as
Durrwachter Wittman Tailwind (WITTMAN TA)
Category
Airplane, amateur-built
Serial number
1051
Airframe hours
55
Engine
Subaru 2.2L EFI CDI, 130 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal · Part 91
Registered owner
John C Durrwachter
Airworthiness certificate
Special, Experimental (Special)
Last inspection
Annual · July 18, 1998 · 55 hours before

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
77
Certificate
Commercial
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land
Medical
Class 3, Valid Medical--w/ waivers/lim
Seat
Left
Flight hours
1,000 total · 55 in this make and model

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
210° at 10 knots
Visibility
7 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
13,000 ft broken
Temperature
66 °F, dew point 39 °F
Altimeter
30.00 inHg
Observed at
HOP, 22 nm away

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.