NYC05IA095

NTSB incident investigation · Airbus Industrie A330-301 · Boston, MA · June 9, 2005

Incident · No injuriesIncident investigationFinal report
Date
June 9, 2005, 19:40 local (23:40 UTC)
Place
Boston, MA
Injuries
448 uninjured
Phase of flight
Takeoff
Aircraft
EI-ORDAirbus Industrie A330-301N394USBoeing 737-3B7
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report May 29, 2007
Report
Approved by Office Director
Parties
FAA Boston FSDO, ALPA, NATCA, AAIU, Aer Lingus, US Airways
Case key
61662

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the incident.

On this page

Probable cause

The local east controller's failure to follow FAA Order 7110.65, para 3-9-8 and Boston Tower Order 7110.11, Standard Operating Procedures, which resulted in a runway incursion during takeoff involving two transport category airplanes.

The local east controller's failure to follow FAA Order 7110.65, para 3-9-8 and Boston Tower Order 7110.11, Standard Operating Procedures, which resulted in a runway incursion during takeoff involving two transport category airplanes.

Sequence of events

NTSB’s coding before 2008: each occurrence and phase of flight, and the causes and factors under it. The codes are defined in NTSB’s coding manual.

Miscellaneous/otherTakeoff - roll/run
Procedures/directives - not followedAtc personnel(lcl/gnd/clnc)Cause
Terrain condition - runway
Miscellaneous/otherTakeoff - roll/run
Procedures/directives - not followedAtc personnel(lcl/gnd/clnc)Cause
Terrain condition - runway

Analysis

The airport was conducting operations on intersecting runways. The local east controller (LCE) was responsible for aircraft operating on runways 4R and 9, and the local west controller (LCW) was responsible for aircraft operating on runways 15R and 4L. Runway 15R intersected three active runways: 4L, 4R, and 9. The LCW was responsible for an Airbus A330, and the LCE was responsible for a Boeing 737. Both controllers were utilizing different frequencies. At 1927:51, the Airbus was instructed to taxi into position and hold on runway 15R. At 1938:24, the LCE contacted the LCW, and reported that he "observed and released" the Airbus. At 1939:10, the LCW cleared the Airbus for takeoff. Five seconds later, the LCE cleared the Boeing for takeoff from runway 9, which resulted in a runway incursion. Boston Tower Order 7110.11J, "Standard Operating Procedures" required the LCW to obtain a release from LCE in order to depart airplanes from runway 15R. Once the release was issued, LCE was required to stop operations on runways 4R and 9 until the airplane departed. Federal Aviation Administration Order 7110.65, Air Traffic Control, paragraph 3-9-8, Intersecting Runway Separation, stated in part: "Separate departing aircraft from an aircraft using an intersecting runway, or nonintersecting runways when the flight paths intersect, by ensuring that the departure does not begin takeoff roll until one of the following exists: a. The preceding aircraft has departed and passed the intersection, has crossed the departure runway, or is turning to avert any conflict... ."

The airport was conducting operations on intersecting runways. The local east controller (LCE) was responsible for aircraft operating on runways 4R and 9, and the local west controller (LCW) was responsible for aircraft operating on runways 15R and 4L. Runway 15R intersected three active runways: 4L, 4R, and 9. The LCW was responsible for an Airbus A330, and the LCE was responsible for a Boeing 737. Both controllers were utilizing different frequencies. At 1927:51, the Airbus was instructed to taxi into position and hold on runway 15R. At 1938:24, the LCE contacted the LCW, and reported that he "observed and released" the Airbus. At 1939:10, the LCW cleared the Airbus for takeoff. Five seconds later, the LCE cleared the Boeing for takeoff from runway 9, which resulted in a runway incursion. Boston Tower Order 7110.11J, "Standard Operating Procedures" required the LCW to obtain a release from LCE in order to depart airplanes from runway 15R. Once the release was issued, LCE was required to stop operations on runways 4R and 9 until the airplane departed. Federal Aviation Administration Order 7110.65, Air Traffic Control, paragraph 3-9-8, Intersecting Runway Separation, stated in part: "Separate departing aircraft from an aircraft using an intersecting runway, or nonintersecting runways when the flight paths intersect, by ensuring that the departure does not begin takeoff roll until one of the following exists: a. The preceding aircraft has departed and passed the intersection, has crossed the departure runway, or is turning to avert any conflict... ."

Factual narrative

On June 9, 2005, about 1940 eastern daylight time, an Airbus A330-301, Irish registration EI-ORD, operated by Aer Lingus as flight 132 (EIN132), and a Boeing 737-3B7, N394US, operated by US Airways as flight 1170 (USA1170) were involved in a runway incursion at General Edward Lawrence Logan International Airport (BOS), Boston, Massachusetts. There were no injures to the 12 crew members, and 328 passengers on the Airbus, or the 5 crew members, and 103 passengers on the Boeing. Neither airplane was damaged. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and an instrument flight rules flight plan had been filed for both flights. Aer Lingus flight 132 was conducted under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 129, and was destined for Shannon, Ireland. US Airways flight 1170 was conducted under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 121, and was destined for Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

According to information obtained from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), both airplanes were under control of the BOS Air Traffic Control Tower. At the time of the incident, aircraft operating at BOS were landing on runways 4R and 4L, and departing from runways 15R and 9. The BOS Local East Controller (LCE) was responsible for aircraft operating on runways 4R and 9, and the BOS Local West Controller (LCW) was responsible for aircraft operating on runways 15R and 4L. Runway 15R intersected 3 active runways: 4L, 4R, and 9. Because runways 4R and 9 were under the control of the LCE, the LCW was required to obtain a release from the LCE before authorizing departures from runway 15R.

The LCW was responsible for EIN132 and the LCE was responsible for USA1170. Both controllers were utilizing different frequencies. At 1927:51, EIN132 was instructed to taxi into position and hold on runway 15R, a 10,083 foot-long, 150 foot-wide, asphalt runway. At 1938:24, the LCE contacted the LCW and said, "observed and released fifteen right [EIN132]..." At 1939:10, the LCW cleared EIN132 for takeoff from runway 15R. Five seconds later, the LCE cleared USA1170 for departure from runway 9, a 7,000 foot-long, 150 foot-wide, asphalt runway.

The co-pilot of US Airways flight 1170 reported that he had called "V1," and then noticed the Aer Lingus A330 rotating just prior to the intersection of runways 15R and 9. He told the captain to "keep it down," and pushed the control column forward. He further stated:

"The Airbus passed overhead our aircraft with very little separation, and once clear of the intersection, the captain rotated, and we lifted off towards the end of the runway. I reported to departure control that we had a near miss at which time Aer Lingus reported 'we concur.'"

Both airplanes proceeded to their respective destinations without further incident.

Both airplanes were equipped with flight data recorders, which were removed and forwarded to the Safety Board's Vehicle Recorders Division, Washington, D.C. (Information pertaining to the flight data recorder from each airplane, can be found in the associated Flight Data Recorder Specialist's Factual Report, located in the public docket.)

During an interview with a Safety Board air traffic control specialist, the LCE stated he was very busy coordinating with airplanes and other controllers at the time of the incident. After releasing EIN132, he noticed the airplane begin the takeoff roll about 1 minute later. At that same time, he received a release for a Delta Shuttle airplane; however, USA1170 was in front of the Delta airplane, and needed to depart first in order for the Delta flight to get on the runway. He further stated that he cleared USA1170 for takeoff to get the Delta airplane in position for departure, and forgot that he had given the LCW the release for EIN132. (For further information pertaining to Air Traffic Control, please see the Air Traffic Control Group Factual Report, located in the public docket.)

The FAA Runway Safety Office categorized the incursion as a "Category A," which was defined as "Separation decreases to the point that participants take extreme action to narrowly avoid a collision, or the event results in a collision."

Boston Air Traffic Control Tower Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), required the LCW to utilize the interphone to coordinate the release with the LCE. The SOPs indicated that the LCW will say: "Request release runway 15R, (CALL SIGN)." The LCE should respond: "(CALL SIGN) observed and released runway 15R." Once the aircraft departed 15R, the LCE could resume normal operations without further coordination.

Federal Aviation Administration Order 7110.65, Air Traffic Control, paragraph 3-9-8, Intersecting Runway Separation, stated in part:

"Separate departing aircraft from an aircraft using an intersecting runway, or nonintersecting runways when the flight paths intersect, by ensuring that the departure does not begin takeoff roll until one of the following exists:

a. The preceding aircraft has departed and passed the intersection, has crossed the departure runway, or is turning to avert any conflict.

b. A preceding arriving aircraft is clear of the landing runway, completed the landing roll and will hold short of the intersection, passed the intersection, or has crossed over the departure runway.

c. Separate IFR/VFR aircraft taking off behind a heavy jet/B757 departure by 2 minutes when departing:

NOTE- Takeoff clearance to the following aircraft should not be issued until 2 minutes after the heavy jet/B757 begins takeoff roll.

1. Crossing runways if projected flight paths will cross...."

Post incident actions

On June 29, 2005, Boston Tower implemented Notice 7110.6, "Aircraft Releases on Non-Standard Runways." The notice:

A. Reiterated timely release coordination for non-standard runway departures and prohibited the use of any other intersecting runway until the departure from the non-standard runway was no longer a factor.

B. Required that once a release had been authorized, the departure strip(s) of the number one/first aircraft to depart on any intersection runway shall be flipped over and placed upside down in the strip bay until the departure from the non-standard runway is no longer a factor.

C. Required a recorded "Rolling Report" on the aircraft departing the non-standard runway.

On July 19, 2006, Boston Tower Notice 7110.6, was superceded by Boston Tower Notice N7110.17, which stated in part:

"7. Procedures.

a. Only Local Control West (LCW) may initiate a release request for a runway 15R departure.

b. The runway 15R departure must be cleared for takeoff within 5 seconds of release or the release is void.

c. Local Control East (LCE) must not have an aircraft holding in position on Runway 9 when a release is given to LCW.

d. LCW must advise LCE when the Runway 15R departure has passed Runway 9. For example: 'Runway 15R Operation Complete.'...

In addition, BOS airport management established a facility workgroup to explore potential changes to control position jurisdiction to minimize/eliminate distractions caused by multiple aircraft on the movement areas waiting for release times.

On June 9, 2005, about 1940 eastern daylight time, an Airbus A330-301, Irish registration EI-ORD, operated by Aer Lingus as flight 132 (EIN132), and a Boeing 737-3B7, N394US, operated by US Airways as flight 1170 (USA1170) were involved in a runway incursion at General Edward Lawrence Logan International Airport (BOS), Boston, Massachusetts. There were no injures to the 12 crew members, and 328 passengers on the Airbus, or the 5 crew members, and 103 passengers on the Boeing. Neither airplane was damaged. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and an instrument flight rules flight plan had been filed for both flights. Aer Lingus flight 132 was conducted under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 129, and was destined for Shannon, Ireland. US Airways flight 1170 was conducted under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 121, and was destined for Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

According to information obtained from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), both airplanes were under control of the BOS Air Traffic Control Tower. At the time of the incident, aircraft operating at BOS were landing on runways 4R and 4L, and departing from runways 15R and 9. The BOS Local East Controller (LCE) was responsible for aircraft operating on runways 4R and 9, and the BOS Local West Controller (LCW) was responsible for aircraft operating on runways 15R and 4L. Runway 15R intersected 3 active runways: 4L, 4R, and 9. Because runways 4R and 9 were under the control of the LCE, the LCW was required to obtain a release from the LCE before authorizing departures from runway 15R.

The LCW was responsible for EIN132 and the LCE was responsible for USA1170. Both controllers were utilizing different frequencies. At 1927:51, EIN132 was instructed to taxi into position and hold on runway 15R, a 10,083 foot-long, 150 foot-wide, asphalt runway. At 1938:24, the LCE contacted the LCW and said, "observed and released fifteen right [EIN132]..." At 1939:10, the LCW cleared EIN132 for takeoff from runway 15R. Five seconds later, the LCE cleared USA1170 for departure from runway 9, a 7,000 foot-long, 150 foot-wide, asphalt runway.

The co-pilot of US Airways flight 1170 reported that he had called "V1," and then noticed the Aer Lingus A330 rotating just prior to the intersection of runways 15R and 9. He told the captain to "keep it down," and pushed the control column forward. He further stated:

"The Airbus passed overhead our aircraft with very little separation, and once clear of the intersection, the captain rotated, and we lifted off towards the end of the runway. I reported to departure control that we had a near miss at which time Aer Lingus reported 'we concur.'"

Both airplanes proceeded to their respective destinations without further incident.

Both airplanes were equipped with flight data recorders, which were removed and forwarded to the Safety Board's Vehicle Recorders Division, Washington, D.C. (Information pertaining to the flight data recorder from each airplane, can be found in the associated Flight Data Recorder Specialist's Factual Report, located in the public docket.)

During an interview with a Safety Board air traffic control specialist, the LCE stated he was very busy coordinating with airplanes and other controllers at the time of the incident. After releasing EIN132, he noticed the airplane begin the takeoff roll about 1 minute later. At that same time, he received a release for a Delta Shuttle airplane; however, USA1170 was in front of the Delta airplane, and needed to depart first in order for the Delta flight to get on the runway. He further stated that he cleared USA1170 for takeoff to get the Delta airplane in position for departure, and forgot that he had given the LCW the release for EIN132. (For further information pertaining to Air Traffic Control, please see the Air Traffic Control Group Factual Report, located in the public docket.)

The FAA Runway Safety Office categorized the incursion as a "Category A," which was defined as "Separation decreases to the point that participants take extreme action to narrowly avoid a collision, or the event results in a collision."

Boston Air Traffic Control Tower Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), required the LCW to utilize the interphone to coordinate the release with the LCE. The SOPs indicated that the LCW will say: "Request release runway 15R, (CALL SIGN)." The LCE should respond: "(CALL SIGN) observed and released runway 15R." Once the aircraft departed 15R, the LCE could resume normal operations without further coordination.

Federal Aviation Administration Order 7110.65, Air Traffic Control, paragraph 3-9-8, Intersecting Runway Separation, stated in part:

"Separate departing aircraft from an aircraft using an intersecting runway, or nonintersecting runways when the flight paths intersect, by ensuring that the departure does not begin takeoff roll until one of the following exists:

a. The preceding aircraft has departed and passed the intersection, has crossed the departure runway, or is turning to avert any conflict.

b. A preceding arriving aircraft is clear of the landing runway, completed the landing roll and will hold short of the intersection, passed the intersection, or has crossed over the departure runway.

c. Separate IFR/VFR aircraft taking off behind a heavy jet/B757 departure by 2 minutes when departing:

NOTE- Takeoff clearance to the following aircraft should not be issued until 2 minutes after the heavy jet/B757 begins takeoff roll.

1. Crossing runways if projected flight paths will cross...."

Post incident actions

On June 29, 2005, Boston Tower implemented Notice 7110.6, "Aircraft Releases on Non-Standard Runways." The notice:

A. Reiterated timely release coordination for non-standard runway departures and prohibited the use of any other intersecting runway until the departure from the non-standard runway was no longer a factor.

B. Required that once a release had been authorized, the departure strip(s) of the number one/first aircraft to depart on any intersection runway shall be flipped over and placed upside down in the strip bay until the departure from the non-standard runway is no longer a factor.

C. Required a recorded "Rolling Report" on the aircraft departing the non-standard runway.

On July 19, 2006, Boston Tower Notice 7110.6, was superceded by Boston Tower Notice N7110.17, which stated in part:

"7. Procedures.

a. Only Local Control West (LCW) may initiate a release request for a runway 15R departure.

b. The runway 15R departure must be cleared for takeoff within 5 seconds of release or the release is void.

c. Local Control East (LCE) must not have an aircraft holding in position on Runway 9 when a release is given to LCW.

d. LCW must advise LCE when the Runway 15R departure has passed Runway 9. For example: 'Runway 15R Operation Complete.'...

In addition, BOS airport management established a facility workgroup to explore potential changes to control position jurisdiction to minimize/eliminate distractions caused by multiple aircraft on the movement areas waiting for release times.

Aircraft · 2

Registration
EI-ORD
Reported as
Airbus Industrie A330-301
Category
Airplane
Serial number
0059
Engines
General Electric CF6-80E1, 68,000 lbs thrust, turbo fanGeneral Electric CF6-80E1, 68,000 lbs thrust, turbo fan
Damage
No damage
Flight
Part 129
Registered owner
Aer Lingus Irish International Airl
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Transport
Departed
BOS · Boston, MA
Destination
EINN · Shannon
Flight plan
IFR
Airport
BOS · Logan International, runway 15R, 10,083 × 150 ft, asphalt
Registration
N394US
Reported as
Boeing 737-3B7
Category
Airplane
Serial number
23316
Airframe hours
54,048
Engines
General Motors CFM56-3-B1, 20,000 horsepower, turbo fanGeneral Electric CFM56-3-B1, 20,000 lbs thrust, turbo fan
Damage
No damage
Flight
Part 121
Registered owner
US Airways Inc
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Transport
Last inspection
Continuous airworthiness · April 1, 2004
Departed
BOS · Boston, MA
Destination
PHL · Philadephia, PA
Flight plan
IFR
Airport
BOS · Logan International, runway 09, 7,000 × 150 ft, asphalt

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew · 4

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot, aircraft 1
Injuries
None
Certificate
Airline transport
Airplane ratings
Multi-engine sea
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 1, Unknown
Seat
Left
Role
Co-pilot, aircraft 1
Age
34
Injuries
None
Certificate
Airline transport
Airplane ratings
Multi-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 1, Without waivers/limitations
Seat
Right
Role
Pilot, aircraft N394US
Age
49
Injuries
None
Certificate
Airline transport
Airplane ratings
Multi-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 1, With waivers/limitations
Last flight review
July 1, 2004
Seat
Left
Flight hours
16,500 total · 10,800 in this make and model · 267 in the last 90 days · 89 in the last 30 days · 11 in the last 24 hours
Role
Co-pilot, aircraft N394US
Age
49
Injuries
None
Certificate
Airline transport
Airplane ratings
Multi-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 1, Without waivers/limitations
Last flight review
April 1, 2005
Seat
Right
Flight hours
17,800 total · 1,200 in this make and model · 202 in the last 90 days · 73 in the last 30 days · 11 in the last 24 hours

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
80° at 4 knots
Visibility
8 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
25,000 ft broken
Temperature
63 °F, dew point 59 °F
Altimeter
30.10 inHg
Observed at
BOS

Docket · 13

The files NTSB released with the investigation on April 12, 2007, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 8.1 MB in all.