SEA04LA081

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 172P · Battle Ground, WA · May 10, 2004

Accident · No injuriesLimited investigationFinal report
Date
May 10, 2004, 11:20 local (18:20 UTC)
Place
Battle Ground, WA
Injuries
2 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N54477Cessna 172P
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report September 1, 2004
Report
Approved by Office Director
Parties
Portland FSDO
FAA report
20040510009209A
Case key
59203

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The student pilot's misjudgment of distance and his failure to do a go-around. Also causal was the instructor's inadequate supervision of the flight. Factors include gusty crosswinds, the dual student's failure to adequately compensate for those winds, a wet runway surface, and a ditch off the departure end of the runway.

Sequence of events

NTSB’s coding before 2008: each occurrence and phase of flight, and the causes and factors under it. The codes are defined in NTSB’s coding manual.

OverrunLanding - roll
Distance - misjudgedDual studentCause
Go-around - not performedDual studentCause
Supervision - inadequatePilot in command(cfi)Cause
Compensation for wind conditions - inadequateDual student
Weather condition - crosswindFactor
Airport facilities,runway/landing area condition - wetFactor
On ground/water encounter with terrain/waterLanding - roll
Terrain condition - ditchFactor

Analysis

The dual student, who holds a private pilot certificate for helicopters, was working towards a fixed-wing add-on to his certificate. As per the lesson profile, the student planned a dual cross country flight, but while en route, the instructor told the student to divert to another field. After arrival at the field, they over-flew the runway and determined that there was a direct crosswind at what they estimated was about 10 knots. The student then entered a left pattern for a full-stop landing on the damp turf runway. During his first two approaches, the student allowed the aircraft to get too high on final, and in both instances a go-around was initiated. On the third approach the aircraft remained on the proper final approach path until it was approximately 50 feet above the ground. At that point the aircraft encountered a wind gust, and it ballooned upward to an extent that the pilot was not able to descend to a position where he felt comfortable initiating the landing flare until the aircraft was almost halfway down the 2,600 foot runway. Then the aircraft "floated for awhile in ground effect" before touching down approximately two-thirds of the way down the runway. During this sequence of events, the student did not attempt to initiate a go-around on his own, and the instructor did not direct him to do one. After the aircraft touched down, the student applied the wheel brakes while holding the yoke full back for aerodynamic braking. Then the instructor came on the controls and assisted with the braking effort. Ultimately the pilots were unable to get the aircraft stopped before it went off the end of the runway, down a steep embankment, and into a ditch. Upon impacting the ditch, the nose wheel folded back and the aircraft sustained substantial damage. The investigation did not find any evidence of problems with the aircraft's flight control or wheel braking systems.

Factual narrative

On May 10, 2004, approximately 1120 Pacific daylight time, a Cessna 172P, N54477, collided with the terrain during the landing roll at Goheen Field, Battle Ground, Washington. Neither the flight instructor or the dual student were injured, but the aircraft, which is owned and operated by Hillsboro Aviation, sustained substantial damage. The 14 CFR Part 91 instructional flight, which departed Hillsboro Airport, Hillsboro, Oregon, about 40 minutes earlier, was being operated in visual meteorological conditions. No flight plan had been filed. There was no report of an ELT activation.

According to the instructor pilot, her student, who holds a private pilot certificate for helicopters, was working towards a fixed-wing add-on to his certificate. As per the lesson profile, the student planned a dual cross country flight to Toledo-Winlock, Washington (TDO), and then while en route, the instructor told the student to divert to Goheen Field. After arrival at the field, they over-flew the runway and determined that there was a direct crosswind at what they estimated was about 10 knots. The student then entered a left pattern for runway 15 for a full-stop landing on the damp turf runway. During his first two approaches, the student allowed the aircraft to get too high on final, and in both instances a go-around was initiated. According to both the instructor and the student, on the third approach the aircraft remained on the proper final approach path until it was approximately 50 feet above the ground. At that point the aircraft encountered a wind gust, and it ballooned upward to an extent that the student was not able to descend to a position where he felt comfortable initiating the landing flare until the aircraft was almost half way down the 2,600 foot runway. Then, according to the student, the aircraft "floated for awhile in ground effect" before touching down approximately two-thirds of the way down the runway. During this sequence of events, the student did not attempt to initiate a go-around on his own, and the instructor did not direct him to do one. After the aircraft touched down, the student applied the wheel brakes while holding the yoke full back for aerodynamic braking. Then, according to the student, the instructor came on the controls and assisted with the braking effort. Ultimately the pilots were unable to get the aircraft stopped before it went off the end of the runway, down a steep embankment, and into a ditch. Upon impacting the ditch, the nose wheel folded back and the aircraft sustained substantial damage.

According to both the instructor pilot and the FAA Inspector that responded to the scene, there was no evidence of any problems with the aircraft's flight control or wheel braking systems.

Aircraft

Registration
N54477
Reported as
Cessna 172P
Category
Airplane
Serial number
74983
Engine
Lycoming O-320, 160 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Registered owner
Hillsboro Aviation
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · April 13, 2004
Departed
HIO · Hillsboro, OR
Destination
W52 · Battleground, WA
Airport
W52 · Goheen Airfield, runway 15, 2,600 × 50 ft, grass/turf

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew · 3

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Flight instructor
Age
26
Injuries
None
Certificates
Commercial, Flight instructor
Airplane ratings
Multi-engine land, Single-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 2, Valid Medical--no waivers/lim.
Last flight review
July 28, 2003
Seat
Right
Flight hours
564 total · 247 in this make and model · 489 as pilot in command · 161 in the last 90 days · 52 in the last 30 days
Role
Student pilot
Injuries
None
Role
Student pilot
Age
29
Injuries
None
Certificate
Private
Medical
Class 2, Valid Medical--no waivers/lim.
Last flight review
August 26, 2003
Seat
Left
Flight hours
124 total · 19 in this make and model · 47 as pilot in command · 24 in the last 90 days · 17 in the last 30 days

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
260° at 7 knots, gusting 12
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
5,000 ft overcast
Temperature
55 °F

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.