SEA70D0062

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 210 · Muleje, Mexico · July 30, 1969

Accident · No injuriesClosed
Date
July 30, 1969
Place
Muleje, Mexico · MULEJE,MEX, MX
Injuries
4 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N9472XCessna 210
Status
Completed · report March 18, 1970
Report
Brief approved by the director
Case key
157643

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

NTSB brief

NTSB’s brief of the accident, as it was printed: the coded facts, with the probable cause and factors.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 FILE    DATE          LOCATION          AIRCRAFT DATA       INJURIES       FLIGHT                        PILOT DATA
                                                               F  S M/N     PURPOSE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6-0042  69/7/30    MULEJE,MEX          CESSNA 210          CR-  0  0  1  NONCOMMERCIAL             PRIVATE, AGE 41, 575
        TIME - 1745                    N9472X              PX-  0  0  3  PLEASURE/PERSONAL TRANSP  TOTAL HOURS, 150 IN TYPE,
                                       DAMAGE-SUBSTANTIAL  OT-  0  0  0                            NOT INSTRUMENT RATED.
        NAME OF AIRPORT - MULEJE
        DEPARTURE POINT             INTENDED DESTINATION
          MEXICALI,MEX                MULEJE,MEX
        TYPE OF ACCIDENT                                         PHASE OF OPERATION
           GROUND-WATER LOOP-SWERVE                                 LANDING: ROLL
           GEAR COLLAPSED                                           LANDING: ROLL
        REMARKS- INVESTIGATION UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE GOVT OF MEXICO.

Aircraft

Registration
N9472X
Reported as
Cessna 210
Category
Airplane
Engine
reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Airport
Muleje

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.