SEA96LA060

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 150G · Vancouver, WA · February 19, 1996

Accident · Minor injuriesLimited investigationFinal report
Date
February 19, 1996, 13:08 local (21:08 UTC)
Place
Vancouver, WA
Injuries
1 minor, 1 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Takeoff
Aircraft
N3272JCessna 150G
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report November 25, 1996
Report
Approved by Office Director
FAA report
19960219002009A
Case key
42338

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

the pilot's failure to use carburetor heat, and his delay in aborting the takeoff after noting sluggish acceleration. Factors were: the carburetor icing conditions, the trees off the end of the runway, and the soft ground conditions in the forced landing area.

Sequence of events

NTSB’s coding before 2008: each occurrence and phase of flight, and the causes and factors under it. The codes are defined in NTSB’s coding manual.

Loss of engine power(partial) - nonmechanicalTakeoff - roll/run
Touch-and-go - performedPilot in command
Weather condition - carburetor icing conditionsFactor
Carburetor heat - not usedPilot in commandCause
Forced landingEmergency landing after takeoff
Terrain condition - high obstruction(s)Factor
Aborted takeoff - delayedPilot in commandCause
Nose gear collapsedEmergency landing after takeoff
Landing gear,nose gear - overload
Nose overEmergency landing after takeoff
Terrain condition - soft

Analysis

The pilot stated that after power application during a touch-and-go the aircraft 'did not seem to accelerate normally.' He elected to continue the takeoff, and checked power and that the carburetor heat was in. He stated that 'I used every inch of the runway', and that after becoming airborne, the plane climbed only to 20 feet, 'then seemed to settle and slow.' As the airplane approached trees off the end of the runway, the pilot became concerned that he would not clear them and made a straight-ahead forced landing. The airplane's nose gear collapsed during the forced landing; the airplane's nose then dug into soft earth and the airplane flipped over. Temperature and dew point conditions reported at Portland, Oregon, 8 nautical miles away, were in a regime of 'serious icing - any power' on a Transport Canada carburetor icing hazard probability chart.

Factual narrative

On February 19, 1996, approximately 1308 Pacific standard time, a Cessna 150G, N3272J, registered to Evergreen Flying Service of Vancouver, Washington, was substantially damaged when it nosed over during a forced landing following a partial loss of engine power on a touch-and-go takeoff from Evergreen Airport in Vancouver. The private pilot was not injured; a passenger received minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions existed and no flight plan had been filed for the local 14 CFR 91 flight from Evergreen.

According to the U.S. Government Airport/Facility Directory (A/FD), Evergreen's runway 28R is 2,545 feet long. The runway is asphalt-surfaced except for the last 400 feet, which is reported in the A/FD as gravel. Overhead aerial imagery in the 1994 Pilot's Guide to Washington Airports (Washington State Department of Transportation) shows the word "EVERGREEN" on this runway in large letters at approximately the midfield point of the runway. Measurements taken from the aerial imagery indicate a distance of approximately 1,289 feet from the letter "N" to the west end of the runway, and approximately 1,032 feet from the first letter "E" to the west end, based on the reported 2,545 foot length. The pilot reported the following concerning the sequence of events:

Landed normally after first takeoff, with the intention of a touch and go. At decision point of full stop or touch and go, I was approx[imately] 200' or so from reaching "the letters". Normal practice is that if you can get back on the power before reaching the letters (EVERGREEN painted on center of runway), then there is plenty of runway for a touch and go. I proceeded with touch and go.

Aircraft did not seem to accelerate normally. I used every inch of the runway, and rotated just above 60 mph. Plane climbed about 20 feet, then seemed to settle and slow. Leveled off to maintain approx[imately] 65 mph, but plane would not climb. Flying level, not climbing, and looking right at the trees, I was convinced I would never clear them. Proceeded to make a straight ahead forced landing....Pointed the nose down, straight ahead. Touched down (wings) level only a few hundred yards from the end of the runway. Front gear collapsed, prop struck, slid about 200 feet. Just before stopping, the nose dug into the soft earth and the plane gently tipped over on [its] nose.

In a telephone interview, the pilot stated that upon noting the slow acceleration, he checked power and carburetor heat in. When queried about the weather conditions, he replied that it was a "perfect day for carburetor icing."

The passenger reported: "Approaching runway, [the pilot] overshot it to the right. [H]e straightened it out for touch and go. I remember landing on or after Evergreen sign on runway. [L]anded then attempted to take off for touch and go. We were just taking off the ground at the edge of [r]unway. We were between 5-10 feet off ground. I knew we were headed pretty close to trees in front. All of a sudden we did nose dive into field and flipped up side down and slid a long way up side down."

A Clark County sheriff's deputy reported that he interviewed both the pilot and the passenger in his patrol car after the accident. His report stated: "[The pilot] said that there are a series of numbers on the runway that signify when a decision is to be made to complete the touch and go, or to actually keep the aircraft on the ground. [The pilot] said that when he reached that particular set of numbers, he attempted to pull the aircraft up to a safe altitude. He said that the plane was not accelerating, or rising. [The pilot] said that his [aircraft's] flaps were in the up position, and the throttle was at full power....[The passenger's] version of the accident was the same as [the pilot's]....Everything that [the passenger] told me was a repeat of [the pilot's] interview."

A FAA inspector who examined the aircraft after the accident reported: "The propeller was bent and extremely curled at the tips....All [airworthiness directives] were complied with and no defects were noted....the carb heat function operated satisfactorily....The fuel sample taken from both tanks was good with no indication of water or contaminants present. Fuel was also present on the carburetor bowl and the jets were operable." He also reported that the aircraft's annual and 100-hour inspection requirements had been complied with, and that the aircraft was within its allowable gross weight limitations based on reported loading at the time of the accident. The operator reported that the engine had 351 hours of service since its last overhaul.

The 1256 automated weather observation at Portland, Oregon, 8 nautical miles from Evergreen, gave winds as being from 190 degrees at 8 knots, temperature 54 degrees F, dew point 40 degrees F, and altimeter setting 29.47 inches Hg. According to a Transport Canada carburetor icing hazard chart, this combination of temperature and dew point conditions is in a regime of "serious icing - any power", bordering near a regime of "moderate icing - cruise power or serious icing - descent power."

The 1966 Cessna 150G owner's manual states: "It is important to check full-throttle engine operation early in the takeoff run. Any signs of rough engine operation or sluggish engine acceleration is good cause for discontinuing the take-off....The engine should run smoothly and turn approximately 2375 to 2475 RPM with carburetor heat off." The manual indicates that the nose wheel is lifted at 50 MPH on a normal takeoff. The manual gives the following operating speeds: best rate-of-climb, 72 MPH at sea level; best angle-of-climb, 52 MPH at sea level; and power-off stall, 55 MPH with flaps up, gross weight 1600 pounds, and zero bank.

Based on temperature and pressure in the 1256 Portland observation and Evergreen's field elevation of 310 feet above sea level, density altitude at Evergreen was approximately 607 feet. The Cessna 150G owner's manual indicates a 40-degree-flaps/power-off landing ground roll distance of 451 feet and a flaps-retracted takeoff ground roll distance of 777 feet at this density altitude, based on zero wind, hard-surfaced runway and 1600 pounds gross weight. The sum of the landing and takeoff ground roll distances is 1,228 feet.

Aircraft

Registration
N3272J
Reported as
Cessna 150G
Category
Airplane
Serial number
15065972
Airframe hours
8,011
Engine
Continental O-200-A, 100 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal · Part 91
Registered owner
Evergreen Flying Service Inc.
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Utility
Last inspection
100 hour · January 13, 1996 · 89 hours before
Departed
59S
Airport
59S · Evergreen, runway 28R, 2,545 × 42 ft, asphalt

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
42
Certificate
Private
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land
Medical
Class 3, Valid Medical--no waivers/lim.
Seat
Left
Flight hours
198 total · 116 in this make and model · 123 as pilot in command · 1 in the last 90 days · 1 in the last 30 days

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
190° at 8 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
5,000 ft broken
Temperature
54 °F, dew point 39 °F
Altimeter
29.00 inHg
Observed at
PDX, 8 nm away

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.