UNK65X0186

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 140 · Camas, WA · October 7, 1964

Accident · No injuriesClosed
Date
October 7, 1964
Place
Camas, WA · CAMAS, WA
Injuries
3 uninjured
Damage
No damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N76645Cessna 140
Status
Completed · report January 29, 1965
Report
Brief approved by the director
Case key
184143

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

NTSB brief

NTSB’s brief of the accident, as it was printed: the coded facts, with the probable cause and factors.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 FILE    DATE          LOCATION          AIRCRAFT DATA       INJURIES       FLIGHT                        PILOT DATA
                                                               F  S M/N     PURPOSE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2-0780   64/10/7   CAMAS WASH          CESSNA 140          CR-  0  0  1  NONCOMMERCIAL             COMMERCIAL, FL.INSTR.,
        TIME - 1915                    N76645              PX-  0  0  2  PLEASURE/PERSONAL TRANSP  AGE 22, 155 TOTAL HOURS,
                                       DAMAGE-NONE         OT-  0  0  0                            85 IN TYPE, NOT
                                                                                                   INSTRUMENT RATED.
        NAME OF AIRPORT - GRONES
        TYPE OF ACCIDENT                                         PHASE OF OPERATION
           COLLIDED WITH: OBJECT                                    LANDING: LEVEL OFF/TOUCHDOWN
        PROBABLE CAUSE(S)
           PERSONNEL - MISCELLANEOUS-PERSONNEL: SPECTATOR
        REMARKS- 90-YEAR OLD MAN DID NOT CLEAR LANDING AREA.

Aircraft

Registration
N76645
Reported as
Cessna 140
Category
Airplane
Engine
reciprocating
Damage
No damage
Airport
Grones

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.