WPR10CA159

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 182P · Long Beach, CA · March 13, 2010

Accident · No injuriesData collectionFinal report
Date
March 12, 2010, 16:45 local (Mar 13, 2010, 00:45 UTC)
Place
Long Beach, CA
Injuries
1 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N52630Cessna 182P
Defining event
Landing-flare/touchdown: Hard landing
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report July 1, 2010
Report
Approved by Office Director
NTSB office
Western Pacific Region
Parties
FAA FSDO
FAA report
20100312029739A
Case key
75504

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The student pilot’s improper landing flare, resulting in a hard landing.

Findings · 2

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Performance/control parameters: landing flareAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Incorrect use/operationAll aircraft: 1,285 casesProbable cause
Use of equip/info: aircraft controlPersonnel issues › Task performance · PilotAll aircraft: 9,295 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Hard landingLanding-flare/touchdownAll aircraft: 2,102 casesDefining event

Analysis

The flight was the student pilot’s first supervised solo flight. The takeoff, crosswind, and downwind legs of the flight appeared to be normal and well controlled. The approach seemed normal with an attitude appropriate for landing. The student turned into the final leg with the flaps set to 30 degrees and with the airspeed at 85 knots. He felt that he was a little high, so he set the flaps to 40 degrees. He adjusted power and attitude to maintain airspeed. He thought that the approach was stabilized and he shifted his gaze forward and reduced power as he passed over the runway end. He thought that he leveled a little high, and landed flat. The airplane bounced hard enough to dislodge his glasses. He raised the nose, the airplane bounced again, and then landed nose-down on the runway. The student's instructor was observing the landing and thought that the flare was a little high, with the airplane touching down main-wheels-first, with the nose slightly up. The nosewheel then quickly hit the ground and the airplane bounced 2 to 3 feet. The airplane touched down again in a flat or slightly nose down attitude and bounced again. It came down in about a 20-degree nose-low attitude on the third and final touchdown and the propeller hit first. The nosewheel and strut folded backwards under the cowling and the firewall buckled. The airplane came to rest with the tail up and the engine stopped.

Factual narrative

The flight was the student pilot’s first supervised solo flight. The certified flight instructor (CFI) stated that the student had consistently displayed the ability to fly the closed traffic on previous flights. The student flew the pattern once without any control inputs or corrections by the CFI. The CFI and student’s son exited the airplane. The takeoff, crosswind, and downwind appeared normal and well controlled. The approach seemed normal with a nose attitude appropriate for landing. The student turned final with the flaps set to 30 degrees and airspeed at 85 knots. He felt that he was a little high, so he set the flaps to 40 degrees. He adjusted power and attitude to maintain airspeed. He thought that the approach was stabilized; he shifted his gaze forward and reduced power as he passed over the runway. He thought that he leveled a little high, and landed flat. The airplane bounced hard enough to dislodge his glasses. He raised the nose, bounced again, and landed nose down on the runway. He turned the fuel selector valve off, switched the master switch off, and exited the airplane unassisted without injury. The CFI thought that the flare was a little high; the airplane touched down main wheels first with the nose slightly up. The nose wheel then quickly followed, and the airplane bounced 2 to 3 feet. The airplane touched down again in a flat or slightly nose down attitude, simultaneously encountered a gust of wind, and bounced again. It came down in about a 20-degree nose low attitude on the third and final touchdown; the propeller and spinner hit first. The nose wheel and strut folded backwards under the cowling, and the firewall buckled. The airplane came to rest with the tail up and the engine stopped.

Aircraft

Registration
N52630
Reported as
Cessna 182P
Category
Airplane
Serial number
18262727
Engine
Teledyne Continental Motors O-470-R, 230 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Operator
N52630, LLC
Registered owner
N52630, LLC
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Departed
LGB · Long Beach, CA
Destination
LGB · Long Beach, CA
Airport
LGB · Long Beach, runway 25R, 6,192 × 150 ft, asphalt

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Student pilot
Age
40
Injuries
None
Certificate
Student
Medical
Class 3, With waivers/limitations
Seat
Left
Flight hours
23 total · 23 in this make and model · 0 as pilot in command · 10 in the last 90 days · 5 in the last 30 days · 1 in the last 24 hours

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
240° at 5 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
20,000 ft overcast
Temperature
59 °F, dew point 45 °F
Altimeter
29.88 inHg
Observed at
KLGB

Docket · 1

The files NTSB released with the investigation on April 7, 2010, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 608 KB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.