WPR11CA470

NTSB accident investigation · Piper PA-28RT-201 · Chandler, AZ · September 28, 2011

Accident · No injuriesData collectionFinal report
Date
September 28, 2011, 11:11 local (18:11 UTC)
Place
Chandler, AZ
Injuries
2 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N8056BPiper PA-28RT-201
Defining event
Landing-flare/touchdown: Hard landing
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report December 1, 2011
Report
Approved by Office Director
NTSB office
Western Pacific Region
Parties
Federal Aviation Administration
FAA report
20110928022629A
Case key
81919

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The certified flight instructor's and pilot-undergoing-instruction's improper flare, which resulted in a hard landing.

Findings · 3

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Performance/control parameters: descent/approach/glide pathAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Not attained/maintainedPiper PA-28RT-201: 1 caseAll aircraft: 809 casesProbable cause
Attention/monitoring: task monitoring/vigilancePersonnel issues › Psychological · Instructor/check pilotPiper PA-28RT-201: 1 caseAll aircraft: 330 casesProbable cause
Use of equip/info: aircraft controlPersonnel issues › Task performance · Flight crewPiper PA-28RT-201: 4 casesAll aircraft: 9,295 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

While on the downwind leg of the traffic pattern, the certified flight instructor (CFI) and pilot-undergoing-instruction (PUI) completed the landing checklist, but delayed the landing gear extension because they were conducting a 180-degree power-off approach. On final approach, as they were preparing to extend the landing gear, the air traffic controller told them to conduct a go-around because the landing gear was not extended. They extended the landing gear, and the CFI verified three green lights. He then requested permission to land and the tower controller cleared the airplane to land. As the airplane approached the runway, a high sink rate developed. The CFI told the PUI to add power, and the CFI simultaneously started to move the throttle control forward. The CFI said that his hand slipped past the PUI's hand, and he reached again to push the throttle forward when the airplane touched down hard on the runway. They aborted the landing, conducted a low approach to verify the position of the landing gear, and landed uneventfully. A postaccident examination revealed rib damage to the left wing. The CFI reported no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

Factual narrative

The certified flight instructor (CFI) submitted a written statement. He was preparing the commercial pilot-undergoing-instruction (PUI) for her CFI certificate. The purpose of the flight was to work on commercial-level takeoff and landing requirements. After departing, they entered the airport traffic pattern. While on the downwind leg of the traffic pattern, they completed the landing checklist but delayed the landing gear extension because they intended on conducting a 180-degree power off approach. On final approach as they were preparing to extend the landing gear, the air traffic control tower controller told them to conduct a go-around because the landing gear was not extended. They extended the landing gear and the CFI verified three green lights. He then requested permission to land and the tower controller cleared the airplane to land. As the airplane approached the runway, a high sink rate had developed. The CFI told the PUI to add power while simultaneously starting to move the throttle control forward. The CFI indicated that his hand slipped past the PUI's hand, and he reached again to push the throttle forward when the airplane touched down hard on the runway. They aborted the landing and after conducting a low approach to verify the position of the landing gear, they landed uneventfully. A post accident examination revealed rib damage to the left wing. The CFI reported no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

Aircraft

Registration
N8056B
Reported as
Piper PA-28RT-201
Category
Airplane
Serial number
28R-8218011
Airframe hours
5,397
Engine
Lycoming IO-360-C1C6, 200 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Operator
Chandler Air Service Inc
Registered owner
Chandler Air Service Inc
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · July 21, 2011 · 37 hours before
Departed
CHD · Chandler, AZ
Destination
CHD · Chandler, AZ
Airport
CHD · Chandler Municipal Airport, runway 04L, 4,870 × 75 ft, asphalt

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew · 2

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Flight instructor
Age
54
Injuries
None
Certificates
Flight instructor, Commercial
Airplane ratings
Multi-engine land, Single-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 2, With waivers/limitations
Last flight review
August 31, 2010
Seat
Left
Flight hours
7,514 total · 179 in this make and model · 7,214 as pilot in command · 89 in the last 90 days · 36 in the last 30 days · 3 in the last 24 hours
Role
Student pilot
Age
35
Injuries
None
Certificate
Commercial
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land, Multi-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 1, Without waivers/limitations
Last flight review
July 6, 2010
Seat
Right
Flight hours
531 total · 46 in this make and model · 291 as pilot in command · 11 in the last 90 days · 3 in the last 30 days

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
Variable at 3 knots
Visibility
30 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
88 °F, dew point 50 °F
Altimeter
30.00 inHg
Observed at
CHD

Docket · 3

The files NTSB released with the investigation on October 21, 2011, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 1.1 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.