WPR14CA092

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 177RG · Richland, WA · December 1, 2013

Accident · No injuriesData collectionFinal report
Date
December 1, 2013, 15:30 local (23:30 UTC)
Place
Richland, WA
Injuries
1 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N7592VCessna 177RG
Defining event
Landing: Landing gear not configured
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report April 1, 2014
Report
Approved by Office Director
NTSB office
Western Pacific Region
FAA report
20131201024579A
Case key
88659

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The pilot's failure to extend the landing gear prior to landing. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's diverted attention and not using a checklist.

Findings · 4

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Action: forgotten action/omissionPersonnel issues › Action/decision · Student/instructed pilotCessna 177RG: 5 casesAll aircraft: 440 casesProbable cause
Landing gear systemAircraft › Aircraft systems · Not used/operatedCessna 177RG: 1 caseAll aircraft: 113 casesProbable cause
Attention/monitoring: attentionPersonnel issues › Psychological · Student/instructed pilotCessna 177RG: 2 casesAll aircraft: 226 casesProbable cause
Use of equip/info: use of checklistPersonnel issues › Task performance · Student/instructed pilotCessna 177RG: 5 casesAll aircraft: 336 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

The student pilot reported that following an uneventful flight, as he entered the airport traffic pattern on the downwind leg, was notified by another pilot that there was an airplane operating within the traffic pattern with no radio. The student pilot established visual contact with one airplane, however, did not establish visual contact with the airplane operating without a radio until reaching the mid-field point on downwind. The student pilot stated that throughout the approach to landing, he maintained visual contact with the airplane until it would not be a factor. The student pilot subsequently landed the airplane with the landing gear in the retracted position, which resulted in structural damage to the fuselage. The student pilot stated that his attention was diverted between maintaining airspeed and a stable approach to the runway, while maintaining visual contact with the airplane that was not in radio contact. He added that he failed to do his before landing checklist as he normally does at the mid-field point on downwind and each turn in the traffic pattern. The pilot reported no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

Factual narrative

The student pilot reported that following an uneventful flight, as he entered the airport traffic pattern on the downwind leg, was notified by another pilot that there was an airplane operating within the traffic pattern with no radio. The student pilot established visual contact with one airplane, however, did not establish visual contact with the airplane operating without a radio until reaching the mid-field point on downwind. The student pilot stated that throughout the approach to landing, he maintained visual contact with the airplane until it would not be a factor. The student pilot subsequently landed the airplane with the landing gear in the retracted position, which resulted in structural damage to the fuselage. The student pilot stated that his attention was diverted between maintaining airspeed and a stable approach to the runway, while maintaining visual contact with the airplane that was not in radio contact. He added that he failed to do his before landing checklist as he normally does at the mid-field point on downwind and each turn in the traffic pattern. The pilot reported no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

Aircraft

Registration
N7592V
Reported as
Cessna 177RG (NO SERIES)
Category
Airplane
Serial number
177RG0883
Built
1976
Airframe hours
5,967
Engine
Lycoming IO-360-A1B6D, 200 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal · Part 91
Operator
Misener Richard H
Registered owner
Misener Richard H
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · March 29, 2013 · 72 hours before
Departed
Hermiston, OR
Destination
RLD · Richland, WA
Airport
RLD · Richland, runway 01, 4,009 × 75 ft, asphalt

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Student pilot
Age
63
Injuries
None
Certificate
Student
Medical
Class 3, With waivers/limitations
Seat
Left
Flight hours
88 total · 37 in this make and model · 29 as pilot in command · 18 in the last 90 days · 7 in the last 30 days · 1 in the last 24 hours

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
Calm
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
8,000 ft broken
Temperature
55 °F, dew point 45 °F
Altimeter
29.84 inHg
Observed at
KPSC, 8 nm away

Docket · 1

The files NTSB released with the investigation on March 26, 2014, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 451 KB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.