WPR23LA136

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 177RG · Spanish Fork, UT · March 15, 2023

Accident · No injuriesClass 3 · LimitedFinal report
Date
March 15, 2023, 13:35 local (19:35 UTC)
Place
Spanish Fork, UT · Runway 12 @ SPK
Injuries
1 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N2572VCessna 177RG
Defining event
Landing-landing roll: Landing gear collapse
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed
Report
Approved by Office Director
Investigation class
Class 3
NTSB office
Western Pacific Region
Parties
FAA
FAA report
20230315007489A
Case key
106926

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The retraction of the main landing gear for undetermined reasons.

Findings · 3

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Performance/control parameters: directional controlAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Not attained/maintainedCessna 177RG: 3 casesAll aircraft: 3,958 cases
Landing gear system: gear extension and retract sysAircraft › Aircraft systems · Unknown/Not determinedCessna 177RG: 4 casesAll aircraft: 416 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

The pilot reported that the landing gear hydraulic pump indicator relay and diode were replaced before he departed on the accident flight. Maintenance personnel performed ground checks and function tests that indicated the landing gear hydraulic pump was operational with no defects. The pilot confirmed that during takeoff and approach for landing all functions of the landing gear indication system were normal. The pilot reported that he moved the flap lever to the 10° down position during the landing roll to prevent the airplane from “dancing around.” Subsequently, the landing gear retracted, causing the airplane’s tail section to skid along the asphalt runway, with the nose landing gear remaining extended and locked. Postaccident examination of the landing gear system revealed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The landing gear function check was performed using steps outlined in the manufacturer’s maintenance manual. The function checks revealed normal operating parameters, with no anomalies noted throughout the examination. The pilot reported that, to prevent the airplane from dancing around during the landing roll, he normally retracted the flaps to get more weight on the wheels and better brake effectiveness. The pilot recalled that he raised the flap lever to the 10° flap down position. As the airplane’s speed decreased, the main landing gear retracted, and it is possible that the pilot unintentionally retracted the landing gear during the landing roll.

Factual narrative

On March 15, 2023, about 1335 mountain daylight time, a Cessna 177RG, N2572V, sustained substantial damage when it was involved in an accident in Spanish Fork, Utah. The pilot was not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that the accident flight was the first flight since the airplane had undergone maintenance to the landing gear pump indication relay and diode to correct an uncommanded gear pump activation. The pilot departed Provo Municipal Airport (PVU), Provo, Utah and retracted the landing gear during the initial climb. After a short cross-country flight to Spanish Fork Municipal Airport/Woodhouse Field (SPK), Spanish Fork, Utah, the pilot was cleared to land. According to the pilot, the extension of the landing gear during the approach was flawless, with all indications and lights operating normally. The pilot reported that the landing was normal. The pilot remarked that, “This airplane normally dances around a little bit after landing, so I usually start retracting the flaps to get more weight on the wheels and better brake effectiveness”. Additionally, the pilot affirmed that he raised the flap lever to the 10° setting during the landing roll and the airplane “started to waller” from side to side. The main landing gear then retracted. With the tail of the airplane dragging on the runway, the airplane skidded to a stop, with the nose of the airplane hanging off the left side of the runway in the dirt. Postaccident photographs of the airplane revealed that the nose landing gear was down and locked, as confirmed during the postaccident examination, but the left and right main landing gear had retracted. Postaccident examination of the landing gear system revealed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The landing gear function check was performed using the manufacturer’s maintenance manual. The landing gear operational function checks revealed normal operation within parameters, with no anomalies throughout the examination. The diode and relay installed the morning of the accident flight were tested and functioned with no defects noted. Following the postaccident examination, the pilot was asked, "Is it possible that you retracted the landing gear instead of the flaps during the landing roll?" The pilot replied, "Regarding your question, I’m pretty sure that the flap lever was never touched during the landing roll."

Aircraft

Registration
N2572V
Reported as
Cessna 177RG
Category
Airplane
Serial number
177RG0620
Built
1974
Airframe hours
2,800.62
Engine
Lycoming IO-360-A1B, 200 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal · Part 91
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · March 10, 2023 · 3 hours before
Departed
PVU · Provo, UT
Destination
Same as departure
Airport
SPK · Spanish Fork Muni/Woodhouse Fld, runway 12, 6,500 × 100 ft, asphalt
Equipment
Stall warning system, Onboard weather, Electronic primary flight display, Electronic multifunction display, Auto-pilot, Electronic flight bag or handheld device, ADS-B, Angle of attack indicator

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
61
Injuries
None
Certificates
Flight engineer, Airline transport
Airplane ratings
Multi-engine land, Single-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 1, Without waivers/limitations
Last flight review
April 15, 2022
Seat
Left
Restraint
3-point
Flight hours
24,500 total · 164 in this make and model · 19,400 as pilot in command · 204 in the last 90 days · 44 in the last 30 days

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
180° at 6 knots
Visibility
9 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
3,000 ft overcast
Temperature
40 °F, dew point 35 °F
Altimeter
2993.00 inHg
Observed at
SPK, 5 nm away

Docket · 9

The files NTSB released with the investigation on November 14, 2024, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 6.4 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.