SAIB ACE-98-21

Special airworthiness information bulletin

Issued
December 31, 1997
Products
Engine
Makes
Teledyne Continental Motors
Models
C-75, C85, C90, O-200, IO-240

Advisory, not mandatory.

The bulletin

Text extracted from the PDF.

SPECIAL

AIRWORTHINESS

INFORMATION

BULLETIN

AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION SERVICE 800 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, S.W.

WASHINGTON, DC 20591

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration

No. ACE-98-21 December 31, 1997

Published by: FAA, AFS-610, P.O. Box 26460, Oklahoma City, OK 73125 This is issued for informational purposes only and any recommendation for corrective action is not mandatory.

Introduction The purpose of this Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB) is to alert owners/operators of Teledyne Continental Motors (TCM ) models C-75, C-85, C-90 (except C-90-8F and C-90-8FJ), O-200, IO-240 series and Rolls-Royce, plc (RR) Models C- 90 (except C-90-8F and C-90-8FJ), O-200, O-240 series reciprocating engines of the distribution of unapprove d magneto drive gears. These magneto drive gears were distributed and/or manufactured by Fresno Airparts Company (formerly Fresno Airmotive Company) and were found to have deficient material properties. Fresno Airparts Company was not authorized by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to manufacture these parts. This information is valuable to anyone who operates one of the above listed engines because of the possibility of magneto drive gear failure which could result in engine failure and possible forced landing.

These engines are installed on, but not limited to:

American Champion Models 7AC, 7BCM, 7CCM, 7DC, S7DC, S7CCM, 7EC, S7EC, 7FC, 7JC, 7ECA and 402;

Cessna Models 120, 140, 150, 150A through 150M, A150K through A150M;

Luscombe Models 8E, 8F, and T-8F;

The New Piper Models PA-18 and PA-19;

Reims Models F150G through F150M, FA150K, FA150L, FRA150L, and FRA150M;

Taylorcraft Models 19 and F19;

Univair (Erco) Models 415-D, 415-E and 415-G;

Univair (Forney) Models F-1 and F-1A;

Univair (Alon) Model A-2: and Univair (Mooney) Model M-10 aircraft.

This information is advisory in nature and not mandated by regulation.

Background A report of a failure of a magneto drive gear distributed and/or manufactured by Fresno Airparts Company was received by the FAA. The reported failure occurred in under 100 hours time-in-service since installation of the magneto gear. An analysis was conducted on 12 additional gears which were found to not comply with type design. An investigation was conducted by the FAA and the Department of Transportation Inspector General’s Office and revealed that the magne to drive gears were distributed by Fresno Airparts Company (formerly Fresno Airmotive Company) and other repair stations, distributor s, or persons listed in Note 1 of this SAIB. The magneto drive gears were manufactured from improper materials, not heat treated or not heat treated properly, and do not conform to the dimensional tolerances of approved gears. These findings led the FAA to conduct a Suspected Una pproved Parts (SUPS) inquiry. The improperly manufactured magneto drive gears have a part numbe r (P/N) 36066 ink stamped on them and were typically shipped in a plastic bag which was placed inside a brown box usually marked only with the P/N. The suspect magneto gear drives are not ones produced by a manufacturer holding a parts manufacturing authority (PMA), which will have a P/N indicating the PMA, or ones produced by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM), which are shipped in boxes mark ed with the OEM’s logo. Improperly manufactured

2 ACE-98-21

magneto gear drives were distributed by Fresno Airpar ts Company (formerly Fresno Airmotive Company) to many repair stations, distributors, and other persons. The FAA has secure d a list of persons to whom Fresno Airparts Company (formerly Fresno Airmotive Company) distributed suspect magneto drive gears. The list appears in Note 1.

There are approximately 36,000 engines installed on aircra ft of U.S. registry on which the suspect magneto gear drives are eligible for installation. The FAA has determined that these parts did not begin to be distributed before December 1993. All magneto dr ive gears installed from December 1993 to the present must, therefore, be considered suspect. There is no visual test to distinguish an improperly manufactured magneto drive gear bearing P/N 36066 from a properly manufactured magneto drive gear with that same P/N. This condition, if not corrected, could result in magneto drive gear failure due to being improperly manufactured, which could result in an engine failure and possible forced landing.

NOTE 1: This list may be used to assist in determining whether P/N 36066 may have been purchased from Fresno Airparts Company. These listed entities ma y have resold parts to oth ers. Invoices indicate that improperly manufactured magneto drive gea rs were purchased from Fresno Airparts Company (formerly Fresno Airmotive Company) by the following from December 1993 to December 1997:

Aero Maintenance, Vancouver, WA;

Aero Pacific, Oceanside, CA;

Aero Tech, San Jose, CA;

Aerospares, Mississauga, Ontario;

Aerotech, Karup, Denmark;

Aerstone Supplies, LTD, Oxon, UK;

Air Support Int., Inc., Marshfield, MO;

Air West Aircraft Engines, San Carlos, CA;

Alta Aircraft Maintenance, W. Jordan, UT;

Athens Air, Athens, TN;

Aviation Buyers Group, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT;

B & K Aircraft Salvage, Mandan, ND;

Bob Bailey, Ruston, LA;

Barkhorn Precision Engines, Vista, CA;

Bela’s Aircraft, Dallas, TX;

Black Hills Aero, Spearfish, SD;

David Branson, Tucson, AZ;

Bruce Machines, Lakeville, CT;

C3D Aviation, Waller, TX;

Central Air Parts, Inc., Staunton, IL;

Central Illinois Aviation, New Berlin, IL;

William Christensen, Taylors, SC;

Chuck’s Aircraft, San Carlos, CA;

Chris Clew, Murfreesboro, TN;

Bill Collins, Gould, AR;

Coastal Aircraft, Juneau, AK;

Cooper Aviation, Fowlerville, MI;

Corporate Aircraft Salvage Pty, Ltd., Jandakot, Perth Western Australia;

Corporate Aircraft Service, Jandakot, Western Australia;

Costa Flying Service, Painted Post, NY;

Crotts Aircraft Service, Dodge City, KS;

D + D Aircraft, Fresno, CA;

DD + D Inc., Grady, AR;

Delta Aviation, Stillwater, OK;

DeMars Aero, Fort Collins, CO;

Don George Aircraft, Orlando, FL;

Dream Machine, Jonesboro, GA;

E.A.A. Maintenance, Oshkosh, WI;

El Reno Aviation, Inc., El Reno, OK;

Engine Components N.W., Aurora, OR;

Estergard Aviation, Chandler, AZ;

Tyrone Ewig, Iron Mountain, MI;

Gibson Aviation, El Reno, OK;

Glen Beard Airspares, Jandakot Airport Western Australia;

Glen's Aircraft Repair, Palmyra, WI;

Gunter Goggelmann, Dallas, TX;

Gold Coast Aviation, Salinas, CA;

Golden Horn Aviation, Sebastin, FL;

Gran-Aire, Inc., Milwaukee, WI;

Hetrick Aircraft, Lawrence, KS;

Art Heunemann, Garland, TX;

Hortman Aviation, Philadelphia, PA;

J's Aircraft Engine + Parts Inc., Dallas, TX;

Kaylor Engines, Ocala, FL;

Kay Air, Indianapolis, IN;

Kline Aviation, Brooklyn, MI;

Lake Aero Repair, Lakeville, MN;

Robert Larson, Medina, OH;

Leading Edge Aviation, Searcy, AR;

John Linke, Omaha, NE;

Lycoming Air Services, Montoursville, PA;

Lycon Rebuilding Company, Visalia, CA;

Lycon, Inc., Mesa, AZ;

Lynn's Aircraft, El Monte, CA;

Lynn's Aircraft Engines, El Monte, CA;

Edwin Macauley, Medford, OR;

Mad Par Aviation, Hillsboro, OR;

Mad River Airport, Urbana, OH;

Mainland Machine, San Luis Obispo, CA;

ACE-98-21 3

Richard Maresh, Syracuse, IN;

Steve Markham, Odiham, Hampshire, England;

Mattituck Aviation Corporation, Mattituck, NY;

Menasco Air, Sonoma, CA;

Mertz Aero, West Chester, PA;

Mid Valley Aviation, Los Banos, CA;

Monticello Aviation, Inc., Monticello, CA;

National Aviation Supply, Seattle, WA;

Nick Carter Aviation, Elizabethton, TN;

North Central Aviation, Linton, ND;

Northern Skies Aviation, Laurel, MT;

O Kanogan Aero Engine, Kelowna, BC, Canada;

Ormond Beach Aviation, Inc., Ormond Beach, FL;

Owatonna Airport, Inc., Owatonna, MN;

Pacific Continental Engines, Van Nuys, CA;

Pete Mason Banner Towing, Santa Paula, CA;

Craig Pickren, Heber Springs, AR;

Progress Photo, Norfolk, VA;

Q.G. Aviation, Fort Collins, CO;

Regional Air Inc., Lawton, KS;

Reimers Aircraft, Anchorage, AK;

Reliant Aviation, Albany, OR;

Carew Rice, Seabrook, SC;

Riley Aviation, Coldwater, MI;

Rocky Mountain Air Service, Nampa, ID;

Ron's Repair, Lopey Island, WA;

Ross Repair, Cambridge, MD;

Sanders Aircraft, Chino, CA;

Savage Magneto, Oakland, CA;

Scott Vally Aviation, Greenview, CA;

Jim Skilling, Groveland, CA;

Sky Dancer Aviation, Lincoln, CA;

Sky Haven Enterprises, Rochester, NH;

Kraig Smyth, Fairbanks, AK;

Snohomish Flying Service, Snohomish, WA;

Ken Snyder, Savage, MN;

South East Airmotive Corporation, Charlotte, NC;

Spana Flight, Puyallup, WA;

Standard Aircraft, Belmont, NC;

Stanton Kline Moss, Gilroy, CA;

Vivian Starr, Plymouth, MN;

Stauffer Aero, Calgary, Alberta, Canada;

Steve's Aircraft Repair, Chester, MT;

Sussex Aero Maintenance, Georgetown, DE;

Tears Aviation, McKinney, TX;

Kirk Tegeriehner, Indianapolis, IN;

Twin Oaks Aviation, Hillsboro, OR;

Vermont Flying Service, Barre, VT;

Victor Aviation, Palo Alto, CA;

West Fargo Aviation, West Fargo, ND;

Jack White, Orangevale, CA;

White Wing Aircraft Engines, Inc., Junction, TX;

Nancy Zawistowski, North Reading, MA.

Recommendation Based on the currently available information, th e FAA is only recommending the following actions.

However, the FAA will continue this investigati on and additional actions, such as issuance of an Airworthiness Directive which may be found to be warranted based upon analysis of new information.

The FAA is recommending the following:

(a) If no work was performed on the magneto drive gears during the time period December 1993 through December 1997, no further action is required.

NOTE 2: A check of engine maintenance records or engine log books for the time period December 1993 to December 1997 may help determine if any wo rk was accomplished on the magneto drive gears (invoices may be necessary to determine exactly what work was completed and what parts replaced).

(b) If work was performed on the magneto drive gears during the time period December 1993 through December 1997, accomplish the following:

(1) Remove from service all magneto drive gears di stributed by Fresno Airparts Company (formerly Fresno Airmotive Company), and replace with serviceable parts. (See Note 1.)

NOTE 3: The suspect parts have an ink stamped P/N 36066 and were usually shipped in a plastic bag, which, in turn, was placed in a brown box and usually marked only with the P/N.

(2) If the origin of the magneto drive gear inst alled cannot be determined, remove the magnetos in accordance with the appropriate maintenance manual, then remove the magneto drive gear from the magneto, and either:

4 ACE-98-21

(i) Remove the magneto drive gear from service, and replace with a serviceable part; or

(ii) Perform the following Rockwell hardness test on the gear. Test in a minimum of two of the following three locations; on the back of the gear, on a gear tooth end, or on the central boss. The type design specifies a Rockwell C scale value of 38 - 42. Any gear that does not meet this specification must be removed from service and replaced with a serviceable part.

(c) A serviceable part may be defined as a new or used magneto drive g ear which successfully passes the Rockwell hardness test specified above or was not distributed from Fresno Airparts Company (formerly Fresno Airmotive Company). (See Note 1.)

(d) Operators are requested to re port any occurrences of magneto failures, engine failure or aircraft incidents that were found to be due to failure of the magneto gear.

For Further Information Contact Jerry Robinette, Aerospace Engineer, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 1895 Phoenix Boulevard, One Crown Center, Suite 450, Atlanta, GA 30349;

telephone (770) 703-6096, fax (770) 703-6097.

U.S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

FIRST-CLASS MAIL

POSTAGE & FEES PAID FAA PERMIT NO. G44

Regulatory Support Division P.O. Box 26460 Oklahoma City, OK 73125-0460 AFS-610

Official Business Penalty for Private Use $300

Registered aircraft it may concern

Registry models matched by Teledyne Continental Motors C-75, C85, C90 and 2 more, the same way as ADs, with the most registered aircraft first.