AC 29-2B

Historical

Advisory circular · Certification of Transport Category Rotorcraft

A newer version is currentThis is a historical version. AC 29-2C CHG 9 is the version in force, approved June 23, 2023.
Approved
July 30, 1997
Last reviewed
January 23, 2001
Cancels
AC29-2A
Cancelled by
AC29-2C
Family
AC 29-2 · 13 versions
Revision
B
14 CFR parts
29

Guidance, not mandatory unless a rule or AD requires it. DRS record last changed November 22, 2025.

Show pages 427–438
Page 439OCROpen in PDF

proper load/contact patterns and absence of excessive surface stress or scrubbing motions. Bearings should be examined to verify that ball or roller paths are within limits, bearing cages are undamaged, and bearing balls or rollers and their races are free from pitting. Any evidence of bearing races turning or spinning in respective housing or bores probably indicates design or fit deficiencies. The applicant should have available wear limits data which include items such as distance across pins and tooth profile limits for gears. Many of these items require special, close tolerance inspection equipment and trained inspectors to determine compliance. In some instances bearings, clutches, oil pumps, etc., should be returned to the original manufacturer for a finding of serviceability. Localized overheating, usually exhibited by discolorations is an indication of an unsatisfactory condition. Should any of the items discussed above or other defects appear such that the component is unserviceable, a redesign which includes recognizable improvements should be required before authorizing a retest. To simply "try again" in hopes of success should not be accepted.

(12) This section also prohibits intervening disassembly which might affect test results. Generally, this simply means no disassembly whatsoever. However, some very limited disassembly can usually be conducted provided care is used to assure that items such as critical fastener torques or gear backlash controls are not disturbed.

c. Additional Test Considerations.

(1) Pressure Lubricated Gearboxes. The endurance test hardware can be adjusted/modified to sustain high-limit oil temperature and low-limit oil pressure in order to provide a basis for approval of the values listed as limits. A minimum of 20 hours at maximum continuous torque and maximum continuous rotational speed should be involved in the test. Other parameters such as minimum oil temperature and maximum oil pressure may more appropriately be evaluated by bench test. The significant points here are effects of extremely high oil pressure (due to the high viscosity of cold oil) on any positive displacement oil pump, on filters for possible collapse, on oil coolers for possible rupture due to internal pressure, seals, bypass valves, and most important, adequate lubrication of gears, bearings, etc., under conditions of minimal oil flow.

Normally, an operation restriction against exceeding idle power/speed conditions until significant warm-up occurs is prescribed. Individual component qualification tests may provide data to meet some of these aspects.

(2) The existing endurance test schedule does not necessarily provide for any asymmetric power inputs from multiengine drive system arrangements. For this situation, the drive system should at least be subjectively evaluated for possible hazards or excessive loads to be expected from asymmetric torque inputs and additional testing prescribed under the authority of § 29.923(g). The extent and severity of these tests should be established in consideration of the design peculiarities, the recommended operating procedures, and any OEl tests included in this test schedule.

656 Par 423

Page 440OCROpen in PDF

(3) Accessory Drives. Normally, all accessory drives on a gearbox will be loaded during the endurance test. Electrical load banks or other suitable methods may be used to assure that the generator drives are loaded and thus properly qualified.

Hydraulic pumps may be loaded by resetting hydraulic system relief valves to maintain limit pressure (load) continuously. If this condition is excessively severe, a method of load cycling may be appropriate. Note that accessory loads reduce the power available to the main rotor. Also, tail rotor loads are, insofar as the transmission is concerned, another large accessory. Care should be taken to assure that in-flight unloading of these accessory drives, including the tail rotor does not subject the main gearbox to loads significantly beyond those qualified by endurance tests.

(4) Gearbox Oil Tanks. Normally, gearbox oil is contained in an integral cast sump which, for other reasons, has sufficient strength to obviate the need for pressure tests. However, a subjective evaluation should be made to assure that detail design features such as sight gauges, filler caps, etc., offer adequate strength.

423A. § 29.923 (Amendment 29-26) ROTOR DRIVE SYSTEM AND CONTROL MECHANISM TESTS.

a. Explanation. Amendment 29-26 includes additional endurance test criteria for a new continuous OEI rating, and clarifies the torque and RPM relation intended for the various power ratings involved in the tests prescribed by this section.

(1) Section 29.923(a)(1) was amended to require that the test cycle be extended beyond 10 hours if OEl rating tests are included in the test program. This change was needed to maintain the cycle aspect of the test if OEI ratings are included.

(2) Section 29.923(a)(3) was amended to include rotational speed as a part of the test because the term "torque" by itself does not adequately define the test requirements.

(3) Section 29.923(b)(2), (f), and (k) were amended to add the test requirements for the new continuous OEl rating and retain, as an alternate, the 30-minute OE rating tests for those applicants who may request this rating. This change provided a regulatory test basis for qualifying the rotor drive system for optional OEI ratings.

(4) Section 29.923(g) was amended to remove the inference that the 2½-minute OEI runs should be repeated if the takeoff run is reconducted. Under these circumstances, additional testing for the 2/½-minute rating is unnecessary.

b. Procedures.

(1) The construction of this amendment is such that a series of runs, each at least (but not limited to) 10 hours in length, should be repeated 20 times for a total of at Par 423 657

Page 441OCROpen in PDF

АС 29-2B 7/30/97 least 200 hours of test. The time required to adjust power or to stabilize operating conditions for those conditions that require stabilization is not included. Figure 423A-1 shows a graphic representation of the 10-hour test cycle. Extension of the total test time beyond 200 hours (or extension of test runs beyond 10 hours) will occur if qualification for the 2½-minute, 30-minute, or continuous OEI optional ratings is proposed by the applicant for rotorcraft equipped with two or more engines. Also, compliance with § 29.923(g) may result in extended endurance tests if dynamic or malfunction conditions exist which adversely affect the endurance tolerance of the rotor drive system. Paragraph 29.923(a) should be interpreted as requiring test runs or cycles to be repeated in essentially the same sequence, although more than 10 hours may be needed to complete a run or cycle. This section also requires the test to be conducted "on the rotorcraft." This means a rotorcraft that is in conformity to the type design for which approval is requested. However, many nonconforming features, such as doors, some cowling and instrumentation, fuel tanks (alternate external fuel supply may be utilized), interior features, fire detectors, extinguishers, inlet ducts, exhaust baffles, etc., may be acceptable provided each item is technically considered and found to have no impact on the test results. Any significant deviations from the conformed rotorcraft type design should be coordinated with the cognizant FAA/AUTHORITY engineering staff and, if found acceptable, properly documented. The restraint (tie-down) arrangement used during the test should be arranged to react rotor thrust loads in lateral as well as vertical directions. The restraint should permit normal deflections due to rotor thrust in the engine and drive system support arrangement.

(2) The test torque and speed requirements of § 29.923(a)(3)(i) refer to the torque/speed combination (or power) values for which approval is requested. The requested torque/speed combination should not exceed the limits approved for the respective engine(s) to be used. An applicant may qualify the rotor drive system for torque values higher than those approved for the engine.

(3) In §§ 29.923(c), (d), (e), and (f), the torque requirements should be interpreted as above; i.e., the run should be made with maximum continuous torque or percentage thereof, as specified by the subparagraph; and the rotational speed should be maximum continuous for Paragraph (d) and the lowest permissable "power-on" speed for Paragraphs (e) and (f). Rotor control cycling should be accomplished during the "maximum continuous" portion of the endurance run. The controls of concern are the flight controls (cyclic and directional controls for typical rotorcraft). The collective control is normally used to set power and is not involved in control cycling. During control cycling, the controls may be cycled from stop to stop; or a limited travel may be accepted if the travel produces the maximum fore and aft, left and right, and yaw thrust components of the rotors as measured in flight. The frequency for cycling the controls is defined in §§ 29.923(c)(1), (2), and (3), and specified in Note 3 of Figure 423A-1.

One method of determining the required control displacement is to measure main rotor mast bending in level forward flight at maximum continuous power for the forward control displacement limit, and in level rearward flight at maximum continuous power (or the power associated with the maximum rearward flight speed to be expected) for the 658 Par 423A

Page 442OCROpen in PDF

aft control displacement limit. Using the same mast bending instrumentation, with the rotorcraft in the ground tie-down situation, and with collective control set for maximum continuous power, displace the cyclic fore and aft to obtain the same mast bending as measured in flight. Similar measurements and control displacements may be used for sideward thrust components. Yaw control displacement should consider maneuver requirements in conjunction with sideward flight. Critical gross weight and center of gravity should be used to establish flight test conditions. These same procedures may be used to establish limited control positions required to comply with § 29.923(1), except that typical flight conditions to be used would be stabilized level flight at maximum continuous power, climb at maximum continuous power, hover, and stabilized sideward and rearward flight. Note that for § 29.923(i)(1), vertical thrust is required. Depending on the mast angle and center of gravity, this condition may not necessarily involve zero mast bending loads. Vertical thrust may be used during the takeoff run, including the runs at 2½-minute power and the overspeed run of § 29.923(h).

One-engine-inoperative runs (§ 29.923(k)) should be conducted with the cyclic set for maximum forward thrust. For these runs and any run that does not specity the position for the yaw control, that control should be set to react to main rotor torque.

(4) Section 29.923(k) sets forth the optional tests to be conducted if a 30-minute or a continuous OEl power rating is requested. Flight control positions should be set for level flight or climb (whichever produces the maximum forward thrust component) and the anti-torque system control should be set to react the maximum rotor torque. The torque and rotational speed values should be the maximum for which approval is requested.

Par 423А 659

Page 443OCROpen in PDF

AC 29-2B

ROTOR DRIVE SYSTEM ENDURANCE 10+ HOUR CYCLE - REPEAT 20 TIMES NOTE 1 (TOTAL OF 200+ HOURS)

2.5 MIN OEI T.O.

30 MIN OEI M.C.

90% M.C. NOTE 3 80% M.C.

60% M.C. Fit. Idle 29.923 (c) MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS RUN 29.923 (d) 90% M.C. 29.923 (e) 80% M.C. NOTE 4 29.923 (f) 60% M.C. 20,022 g REPEAT T.O. RUN MALFUNCTION RUN OR 29.923 (h) OVERSPEED AT M.C. TORQUE 29,07 ₴ (k) EACH ENGINE 30 MIN O.E.I. OR CON'T O.E.I. O.E.I. RUN NOTE 2 Gr. Idle TAKEOFF RUN 29.923(6) , 7/30/97 Par 423A TIME - HOURS FIGURE 423A-1

Page 444OCROpen in PDF

7/30/97 423A TAKEOFF RUN PORTION OF ROTOR

DRIVE SYSTEM ENDURANCE TEST IF 2 1/2 MINUTE OEI RATING IS REQUESTED 2 1/2 MIN. OE NOTE 1 - T.O.

FIt. Idle #1 ENGINE 2 1/2 MIN. O m #2 ENGINE 2 1/2 MIN. OE #1 ENGINE 2 1/2 MIN. OEI #2 ENGINE 2 1/2 MIN. OEI Gr. Idle 10 20 30 40 AC 29-2B

TIME - MINUTES * NOTE 2 FIGURE 423A-2

Page 445OCROpen in PDF

AC 29-2B

TAKEOFF RUN PORTION OF ROTOR

DRIVE SYSTEM ENDURANCE TEST TO NIW NOTE 1 IF 30 SECOND/2 MINUTE OEI RATING

IS REQUESTED T.O.

* #1 ENGINE 30 SEC & 2 MIN OEI #2 ENGINE 30 SEC & 2 MIN OEI * GR. IDLE 10 20 30 40 50 * NOTE 2 TIME - MINUTES 7/30/97 Par 423A FIGURE 423A-3

Page 446OCROpen in PDF

Figures 423A-1. 423A-2, and 423A-3 Notes

1. If the 2½-minute OEl rating is requested, the following should be conducted for each engine: Demonstrate 2½-minute OEl power twice or 5 minutes per cycle for a total of 100 minutes at 2½-minute OEI power during the 200-hour endurance test. See Figure 423A-2 for a graphic description of the takeoff run for a two-engine rotorcraft using the 2/½-minute OEl rating (Refer to § 29.923(b)(2)). If the 30-second/2-minute OEI rating is requested, the following should be conducted for each engine: Demonstrate 30-second OEI power followed by 2-minute OEI power. After 2 minutes reduce and stabilize power to 30-minute or continuous OEI level. Once the power is stabilized reapply 2 minute OEI power.

This should result in 4½ minutes per cycle for a total of 10 minutes at 30-second OEI power and 80 minutes at 2-minute OEI power during the 200-hour endurance test. See Figure 423A-3 for a graphic description of the takeoff run for a two-engine rotorcraft (Refer to § 29.923(b)(3)). If either the 2½-minute or 30-second/2-minute OEl ratings are demonstrated, the takeoff run portion of Figure 423A-1 will be longer than 1 hour as shown in Figure 423A-2 or 423A-3, respectively.

Apply the rotor brake during the first minute of the 5-minute idle period. Conduct 400 brake applications during the 200-hour endurance test (§ 29.923(i)).

During the maximum continuous run, cycle the rotor controls 15 times per hour:

(Refer to §§ 29.923(c)(1) - (3)). The cyclic control should be cycled through maximum vertical thrust, maximum forward, maximum left, maximum right, and maximum rearward thrusts. The pedal controls should be cycled through maximum right, neutral, and maximum left positions. Each maximum cyclic and pedal control position should be held for at least 10 seconds. During the remainder of the test, set the yaw control to react to the main rotor torque, and set the flight controls to achieve:

Condition Portion of Test max vertical trust 20 percent max forward thrust 50 percent max left thrust 10 percent max right thrust 10 percent max rearward thrust 10 percent

4. The 60 percent maximum continuous run is 2 hours (Refer to § 21 29.923(f)), Par 423A 663

Page 447OCROpen in PDF

unless either 30-minute OEI or continuous OEl power is requested. In that case, the 60 percent maximum continuous run is 1 hour.

5. A 1-hour malfunction run (if deemed necessary) or the takeoff run is repeated (without OE portions). Refer to § 29.923(g).

6. The OEI run defined in § 29.923(k) is not required unless an OEI power rating is requested. If a 30-minute OEl power rating is requested, each engine in sequence should be run at the 30-minute OEI condition for 30 minutes. If a continuous OEI power rating is requested, each engine in sequence should be run at the continuous OEI condition for 1 hour. The total OEI run time may exceed the 1 hour shown in Figure 423A-1.

423B. § 29.923 (Amendment 29-31) ROTOR DRIVE SYSTEM AND CONTROL MECHANISM TESTS.

a. Explanation. Amendment 29-31 added § 29.923 (p) that defines qualification tests for lubricants used in the rotor drive system and control mechanisms.

Section 29.923(p) contains a requirement for a portion of the system qualification tests to be accomplished with specific lubricating oil temperatures and pressures.

b. Procedures. The requirements of Paragraph 29.923(p) should be met for all rotor drive system and control mechanism qualification tests. Additionally, these requirements should be met if certification of alternate lubricants for the rotor drive system is requested. Thirty hours of qualification testing is required on the gearbox in which the alternate lubricant(s) is proposed to be used. During this testing, the lubricant temperature is to be measured with the temperature probes that will be used in service. The lubricant temperature should be maintained at the maximum operating temperature established for the gearbox in service. For pressure lubricated systems, the gearbox lubricant pressure should be maintained at the minimum operating pressure that has been established for the gearbox in service. The lubricant pressure is to be measured in the same manner and with the same probes that will be used in service. During the 30 hours of testing required by § 29.923(p), the lubricant temperature and pressure should be applied and measured simultaneously. For one-engine-inoperative ratings, the test time should be extended by one engine failure cycle to include operation at the one-engine-inoperative rating for which approval is requested. Equivalent testing or comparative analysis of the proposed lubricant and the approved lubricant specifications may be used to approve an alternate lubricant.

423C. § 29.923 (Amendment 29-34 and 29-40) ROTOR DRIVE SYSTEM AND CONTROL MECHANISM TESTS.

a. Explanation. This paragraph, 423C, reflects changes made by Amendment 29-34 and 29-40. Amendment 29-34 added § 29.923(b)(3) that defines 664 Par 423A

Page 448OCROpen in PDF

7130/97 AC 29-2B qualification tests for 30-second/2-minute OEl ratings. This new paragraph also allows for the 30-second/2-minute OE portion of the endurance test to be accomplished on a representative bench test stand using the drive system components which can be adversely affected by these tests. Amendment 29-40 doubles the endurance test time for 2-minute OEl for each power section.

b. Procedures.

(1) For accomplishment of the endurance test for 30-second/2-minute OEI, Paragraph 29.923(b)(3) requires that immediately following one of the 5-minute power on takeoff runs of § 29.923(b)(1) each engine must simulate a power failure and each engine providing power after the failure must apply the maximum torque and maximum speed for use with 30-second OEl power. This power level should be maintained for at least 30-seconds. The 30-second OE power should then be followed by an application of the maximum torque and maximum speed for 2-minute OEI power for at least 2 minutes. After the 2-minute OE power application the power should be reduced to and stabilized at 30-minute or continuous OE, (whichever rating the rotorcraft will be certified with). After the power has been stabilized, the maximum torque and maximum speed for use with 2-minute OEI power should be reapplied for at least 2 minutes.

Figure 423A-1 shows a graphic representation of the ten-hour test cycle with the 30-second/2-minute OE segment included for each engine presented in Figure 423A-3.

This figure shows the OEl test segment being accomplished immediately following a 5 minute takeoff run. The OEl test segment can be accomplished after any of the 5-minute takeoff run segments. Paragraph 29.923(b)(3) also requires that one of the 30-second/2-minute OEI segments for each engine be accomplished from the flight idle condition.

(2) Additionally, due to the damage inflicted on the engines and the ensuing cost caused by operating the engine at these powers, the 30-second/2-minute portion of the endurance test can be accomplished on a bench test rig found to be representative of the rotorcraft. The representative bench test rig should have the ability to generate the torques, speeds, torsional vibration frequency, and engine acceleration rate generated by the actual installation. The power should have the same method/path of application as that used on the rotorcraft. The test rig should be configured with the same components used for conducting the endurance test on the rotorcraft except that the test components not affected by asymmetric power application may not have to be installed (i.e., if a separate combining gearbox is used it may not be necessary to have the main transmission installed on the bench test rig).

(3) When conducting the bench test for 30-second/2-minute OEI, it is not necessary to reaccomplish the takeoff portion of the endurance test. The simulated power failure and application of 30-second/2-minute OE power by the remaining power section should be accomplished after the input power has stabilized at takeoff power.

The takeoff portion of the endurance test should be accomplished on the rotorcraft.

Par 423C 665

Page 449OCROpen in PDF

424. § 29.927 (Amendment 29-17) ADDITIONAL TESTS.

a. Section 29.927 (a):

(1) Explanation. This paragraph is authority to require any special tests or investigations to establish that the rotor drive system is safe.

(2) Procedures. The certification engineer should review the design of the rotor drive system and its installation and intended operation for features or conditions that may not be adequately qualified in the tests prescribed by this Part. Additional qualification test programs should be developed and accomplished to ensure safe operation of the system. Items of interest would include poorly defined load paths associated with redundant design features, flight deflections of structure, mounting arrangements which may not be properly qualified by ground tests, and special or unusual operating procedures which are anticipated by the applicant.

b. Section 29.927 (b):

(1) Explanation. This paragraph prescribes testing to qualify the rotor drive system for the power excursions to be expected with governor-controlled engines wherein the engine power changes automatically to maintain rotorspeed at preselected values. At high collective flight control displacements, the normal rotor speed droop will result in governor-controlled engines automatically accelerating to maximum fuel flow or to any other power, speed, temperature, or torque limiting device, regardless of crew action or artificially established limitations reflected by instrument markings. This high power condition can occur typically during a normal landing when the crew applies high collective to cushion ground contact or, for multiengine rotorcraft, during any flight regime when an engine fails and the corresponding loss of power results in drooping the rotor speed. Special tests are prescribed by this section to provide assurance that the rotor drive system can safely sustain these conditions. The tests of this section should be conducted without intervening disassembly, and all rotor drive system components should be in serviceable condition after the test. It is permissible but not required that these tests be performed on the same specimen of the rotor drive system used to show compliance with § 29.923.

(2) Procedures. These tests should be conducted on a ground-test rotorcraft conformed to the type design configuration similar to that required for endurance testing under § 29.923. Cyclic and collective control may be set to simulate vertical lift and antitorque control set and/or adjusted to react to main rotor torque. Rotation speed should be maximum normal for the test condition; i.e., for the all-engines test under § 29.927(b)(1), use the maximum RPM for takeoff power. For the one-engine-inoperative (OEI) test of § 29.927(b)(2), RPM droop, if any, that would occur in service, may be allowed. Since the OEl test of § 29.927 (b)(2) usually requires the remaining engine(s) to produce power not usually available under normal atmospheric conditions, some supplemental method, such as refrigerating and/or 666 Par 424

Page 450OCROpen in PDF

ramming inlet air, or overfueling the engine, may be required. Alternatively, bench testing (transmission test rig) of the rotor drive system (using only the components subject to the higher OE power, if desired) may be appropriate providing close simulation of the rotor drive system installation environment is achieved. Overtesting, to compensate for inadequacies in the bench test setup may be negotiated with the FAA/AUTHORITY approval office. Note that compliance with § 29.903(b) requires that the remaining engine(s) be capable of continued safe operation under the same conditions as dictated by this test. The engine manufacturer may have already conducted tests adequate to substantiate this requirement. If not, his assistance in testing and the subsequent serviceability finding is imperative.

c. Section 29.927 (c):

(1) Explanation. This paragraph prescribes a test which is intended to demonstrate that in the event of a major failure of the lubrication system used on the rotor drive system, no hazardous failure or malfunction will occur in the rotor drive system that will impair the capability of the crew to execute an emergency descent and landing. The lubrication system failure modes of interest usually are limited to failure of external lines, fittings, valves, coolers, etc., of pressure lubricated transmissions and/or gearboxes.

(2) Procedures. Conventionally, a bench test (transmission test rig) is used to demonstrate compliance with this rule. Since this is essentially a test of the capability of the residual oil in the transmission to provide limited lubrication, a critical entry condition for the test would be the critical eligible lubricant preheated to the transmission oil temperature limit. With the transmission operating at maximum normal speed, with lubricant as described above, with nominal cruise torque applied (reacted as appropriate at main mast and tail rotor output quills), and with a vertical load at the mast equal to gross weight of the rotorcraft at 1g, disconnect or cause a leak in an external oil plumbing device. Upon illumination of the low oil pressure warning (required by § 29.1305), reduce input torque to simulate autorotation and continue rotation for 15 minutes. Apply input torque to simulate a minimum power landing for approximately 15 seconds to complete the test. Successful demonstration may involve limited damage to the transmission provided it is determined that the autorotative capabilities of the rotorcraft were not significantly impaired.

d. Section 29.927 (d):

(1) Explanation. This test is intended to demonstrate that overspeed conditions which may result from control failure or control misapplication will not incur damage to the rotor drive system. Specific conditions for conducting the test are provided in § 29.927(d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3).

(2) Procedures. The test may be conducted on a rotorcraft configured for the endurance tests prescribed by § 29.923. Turbine engines involved in the test may Par 424 667