- Effective
- May 30, 2003
- Published
- April 25, 2003 · 68 FR 20339–20341
- Issued
- April 18, 2003
- Model
- MD-90-30
- Data sheet
- TCDSA6WE
- Registered aircraft
- 5 matched by model
- Product
- Aircraft · Large airplane
- Amendment
- 39-13129
- Docket
- 2001-NM-173-AD
- Issued as
- Final rule
Unofficial copy from the Federal Register XML, document 03-10116. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed May 30, 2024.
Copies of the files this page was built from, with their SHA-256. Retrieved October 18, 2026.
| File | Size | SHA-256 | Original |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official PDF | 138 KB | e887e6c1…56e48d6 | 03-10116.pdf on govinfo.gov |
| Federal Register XML | 17 KB | 44450e28…961cbc5 | 03-10116.xml on federalregister.gov |
| FAA DRS HTML attachment | 56 KB | 9acb9909…cd79a40 | FAA DRS (API key needed) |
| FAA DRS PDF | 28 KB | dd8e28d1…c1bc72a | FAA DRS (API key needed) |
On this page
Summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model MD-90-30 airplanes, that requires a one-time inspection for chafing of the RDB wire bundle against the No. 2 automatic direction finder (ADF) receiver located at the aft end of the forward right radio rack; repair or replacement, if necessary; and modification of the wire bundle. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent chafing of the RDB wire bundle against the No. 2 ADF receiver, which could result in electrical arcing and consequent smoke and/or fire in the cockpit. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Rule preamble
The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.
DatesPage 1
Effective May 30, 2003.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of May 30, 2003.
AddressesPage 1
The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024). This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC.
For further information contactPage 1
George Mabuni, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5341; fax (562) 627-5210.
Supplementary informationPage 1
A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas MD-90-30 airplanes was published in the Federal Register on September 23, 2002 (67 FR 59481). That action proposed to require a one-time inspection for chafing of the RDB wire bundle against the automatic direction finder (ADF) receiver located at the aft end of the forward right radio rack; repair or replacement, if necessary; and modification of the wire bundle.
CommentPage 1
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to the single comment received.
The commenter states that the unsafe condition corrected by the proposed AD only exists when the No. 2 ADF receiver is installed on the airplane, and asks that explicit relief be included in the proposed AD to preclude action if the operator does not use the No. 2 ADF receiver. The commenter notes that without the No. 2 ADF receiver installed, there is no unsafe condition.
The FAA agrees with the commenter, and notes that the referenced service bulletin specified that the chafing condition could exist only on airplanes equipped with the No. 2 ADF receiver. We have changed the applicability in this final rule to add that it is only applicable to airplanes equipped with the No. 2 ADF receiver. In addition, we have changed the term, “ADF receiver” to “No. 2 ADF receiver” throughout the final rule.
Explanation of Editorial ChangePage 1
We have changed the service bulletin citation throughout this final rule to exclude the Evaluation Form. The form is intended to be completed by operators and submitted to the manufacturer to provide input on the quality of the service bulletin; however, this AD does not include such a requirement.
ConclusionPage 2
After careful review of the available data, including the comment and change noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes previously described. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
Cost impactPage 2
There are approximately 96 airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 21 airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD.
It will take approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish the inspection, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the inspection required by this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $1,260, or $60 per airplane.
It will take approximately 4 work hours per airplane to accomplish the modification of the RDB wire bundle, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Parts cost is minimal. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the modification required by this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $5,040, or $240 per airplane.
Should an operator be required to accomplish the repair or replacement of the wire bundle, it will take approximately 2 work hours per airplane to accomplish the actions, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Parts cost is minimal. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the repair or replacement required by this AD is estimated to be $120 per airplane.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other administrative actions.
Regulatory impactPage 2
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this final rule does not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a “significant rule” under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
Adoption of the amendmentPage 2
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Affected TCDS · 1
The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.
Registered aircraft · 5
Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.
| 1995 | 1 |
|---|---|
| 1996 | 2 |
| 1998 | 1 |
| 1999 | 1 |