- Effective
- March 20, 2012
- Published
- February 14, 2012 · 77 FR 8092–8094
- Issued
- February 6, 2012
- Supersedes
- AD2010-03-06
- Superseded by
- AD2018-12-01
- Models
- Arriel 2B, Arriel 2B1
- Data sheet
- TCDSE00054EN
- Registered aircraft
- 333 matched by model
- Product
- Engine
- Amendment
- 39-16953
- Docket
- FAA-2009-0889
- Project
- 2009-NE-35-AD
- Issued as
- Final rule
Unofficial copy from the Federal Register XML, document 2012-3255. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed August 7, 2025.
Copies of the files this page was built from, with their SHA-256. Retrieved October 18, 2026.
| File | Size | SHA-256 | Original |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official PDF | 153 KB | 48f9e5e3…a3e0234 | 2012-3255.pdf on govinfo.gov |
| Federal Register XML | 16 KB | a78ae461…f5c2ecf | 2012-3255.xml on federalregister.gov |
| FAA DRS HTML attachment | 52 KB | 6dce0b84…5aafa53 | FAA DRS (API key needed) |
| FAA DRS PDF | 39 KB | 8553eaf5…9a043a8 | FAA DRS (API key needed) |
On this page
Summary
We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for all Turbomeca S.A. Arriel 2B and 2B1 turboshaft engines. That AD currently requires checking the transmissible torque between the low-pressure (LP) pump impeller and the high-pressure (HP) pump shaft on high-pressure/low-pressure (HP/LP) pump hydro-mechanical metering units (HMUs) that do not incorporate Modification TU 147. This new AD requires inspection and possible replacement of the HMU. This AD was prompted by three additional cases of uncoupling of the HP/LP pump HMU LP fuel pump impeller and the HP fuel pump shaft, since the existing AD was issued. We are issuing this AD to prevent an uncommanded in-flight shutdown, which can result in a forced autorotation landing or accident.
The airworthiness directive
2012-03-11 Turbomeca S.A.: Amendment 39-16953; Docket No. FAA-2009-0889; Directorate Identifier 2009-NE-35-AD.
(a) Effective Date
PDF page 2This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective March 20, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
PDF page 2This AD supersedes AD 2010-03-06, Amendment 39-16189 (75 FR 5689, February 4, 2010).
(c) Applicability
PDF page 2This AD applies to all Turbomeca S.A. Arriel 2B and 2B1 turboshaft engines.
(d) Unsafe Condition
PDF page 2This AD was prompted by three additional cases of uncoupling of the high-pressure/low-pressure (HP/LP) pump hydro-mechanical metering unit (HMU) low-pressure (LP) fuel pump impeller and the high-pressure (HP) fuel pump shaft, since AD 2010-03-06 (75 FR 5689, February 4, 2010) was issued. However, these failures were in HMUs that were modified to post-TU 147 configuration HMUs. The investigation indicates that these HMUs may also need to be replaced. We are issuing this AD to prevent an uncommanded in-flight shutdown, which can result in a forced autorotation landing or accident.
(e) Compliance
PDF page 2Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done.
(1) Check the transmissible torque between the LP fuel pump impeller and the HP fuel pump shaft as follows:
(i) For HMUs that do not incorporate Modification TU 147, check the torque before accumulating 500 engine flight hours (EFH) since March 11, 2010 (the effective date of AD 2010-03-06 (75 FR 5689, February 4, 2010)). Use Paragraph 2 of Turbomeca Alert Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) No. A292 73 2830, Version B, dated July 10, 2009, to do the check.
(ii) For HMUs that incorporated Modification TU 147 on or before March 31, 2010 and those HMUs that are not listed in Figures 2 or 3 of Turbomeca Alert MSB No. A292 73 2836, Version A, dated August 17, 2010:
(A) Check the torque within 750 EFH from the effective date of this AD, but no later than 14 months after the effective date of this AD.
(B) Use Paragraph 2 of Turbomeca Alert MSB No. A292 73 2836, Version A, dated August 17, 2010, to do the check.
(2) If the HMU does not pass the torque check, then replace the HMU with an HMU that is eligible for installation.
(f) HMU Reinstallation
PDF page 3Do not install any HMU removed from service by this AD until it has been checked in accordance with Paragraph 2 of Turbomeca Alert MSB No. A292 73 2836, Version A, dated August 17, 2010, or checked in accordance with Paragraph 2 of Turbomeca Alert MSB No. A292 73 2830, Version B, dated July 10, 2009, and found eligible for installation.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
PDF page 3The Manager, Engine Certification Office, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your request.
(h) Related Information
PDF page 3For more information about this AD, contact Rose Len, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781-238-7772; fax: 781-238-7199; email: rose.len@faa.gov.
(i) Material Incorporated by Reference
PDF page 3You must use the following service information to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 of the following service information on the date specified.
(1) Turbomeca Alert Mandatory Service Bulletin No. A292 73 2836, Version A, dated August 17, 2010 approved for IBR on March 20, 2012.
(2) Turbomeca Alert Mandatory Service Bulletin No. A292 73 2830, Version B, dated July 10, 2009 approved for IBR on March 11, 2010.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Turbomeca S.A., 40220 Tarnos, France; phone: 33-05-59-74-40-00, fax: 33-05-59-74-45-15.
(4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 781-238-7125.
(5) You may also review copies of the service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr_locations.html.
Rule preamble
The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.
DatesPage 1
This AD is effective March 20, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of March 20, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain other publication listed in this AD as of March 11, 2010 (75 FR 5689, February 4, 2010).
AddressesPage 1
For service information identified in this AD, contact Turbomeca S.A., 40220 Tarnos, France; phone: 33-05-59-74-40-00, fax: 33-05-59-74-45-15. You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 781-238-7125.
For further information contactPage 2
Rose Len, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781-238-7772; fax: 781-238-7199; email: rose.len@faa.gov.
DiscussionPage 2
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2010-03-06, Amendment 39-16189 (75 FR 5689, February 4, 2010). That AD applies to the specified products. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on November 7, 2011 (76 FR 68661). That NPRM proposed to require inspection and possible replacement of the HMU.
CommentsPage 2
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. The following presents the comment received on the proposal and the FAA's response to that comment.
Claim That the Shop Rate Is Too LowPage 2
One commenter, Advanced Helicopter Services, claimed that our shop rate in the proposed AD was too low.
We do not agree. We used the hourly labor rate determined by the Office of Management and Budget. We did not change the AD.
Clarification of Paragraph (e)(1)(ii)Page 2
Since we issued the NPRM (76 FR 68661, November 7, 2011), we determined that paragraph (e)(1)(ii) was unclear and made changes to clarify the population affected. We also reformatted the compliance instruction in this paragraph for clarity.
ConclusionPage 2
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD with the change described previously.
Costs of CompliancePage 2
Based on the service information, we estimate that this AD will affect about 540 engines installed on helicopters of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will take about 2.5 work-hours per engine to comply with this AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Replacement HMUs will cost about $12,000 per engine. Based on these figures, if all of the HMUs were to fail the check, we estimate the cost of the AD on U.S. operators to be $6,594,750.
Authority for This RulemakingPage 2
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, “General requirements.” Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory findingsPage 2
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a “significant rule” under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Adoption of the AmendmentPage 2
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
Adoption of the amendmentPage 2
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD) 2010-03-06, Amendment 39-16189 (75 FR 5689, February 4, 2010), and adding the following new AD:
Affected TCDS · 1
The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.
Registered aircraft · 333
Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.
| 1991 | 1 |
|---|---|
| 1998 | 3 |
| 1999 | 4 |
| 2000 | 5 |
| 2001 | 17 |
| 2002 | 25 |
| 2003 | 24 |
| 2004 | 18 |
| 2005 | 18 |
| 2006 | 18 |
| 2007 | 29 |
| 2008 | 40 |
| 2009 | 34 |
| 2010 | 31 |
| 2011 | 35 |
| 2012 | 15 |
| 2015 | 3 |
| 2016 | 1 |
| 2017 | 1 |
| 2018 | 2 |
9 with no year recorded