- Effective
- November 5, 2014
- Published
- October 1, 2014 · 79 FR 59102–59104
- Issued
- September 19, 2014
- Models
- 767-200 Series, 767-300 Series, 767-300F Series, 767-400ER Series
- Data sheet
- TCDSA1NM
- Registered aircraft
- 439 matched by model
- Product
- Aircraft · Large airplane
- ATA chapter
- 28 · Fuel
- Amendment
- 39-17975
- Docket
- FAA-2013-0672
- Project
- 2013-NM-058-AD
- Issued as
- Final rule
Unofficial copy from the Federal Register XML, document 2014-22979. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed August 7, 2025.
Copies of the files this page was built from, with their SHA-256. Retrieved October 18, 2026.
| File | Size | SHA-256 | Original |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official PDF | 231 KB | 264c8cc6…9d8b51c | 2014-22979.pdf on govinfo.gov |
| Federal Register XML | 23 KB | 5248bf90…babbfcd | 2014-22979.xml on federalregister.gov |
| FAA DRS HTML attachment | 68 KB | 468408d6…8f6baa4 | FAA DRS (API key needed) |
| FAA DRS PDF | 104 KB | ab4ea67a…d007328 | FAA DRS (API key needed) |
On this page
Summary
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 767-200, -300, -300F, and -400ER airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports indicating that a standard access door was located where an impact-resistant access door was required, and stencils were missing from some impact-resistant access doors. This AD requires an inspection of the wing fuel tank access doors to determine whether impact-resistant access doors are installed in the correct locations, and to replace incorrectly installed doors with impact-resistant access doors. This AD also requires an inspection for stencils and index markers on impact-resistant access doors, and application of new stencils or index markers if necessary. In addition, this AD requires revising the maintenance program to incorporate changes to the airworthiness limitations section. We are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
The airworthiness directive
2014-20-02 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-17975; Docket No. FAA-2013-0672; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-058-AD.
(a) Effective Date
PDF page 2This AD is effective November 5, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
PDF page 2None.
(c) Applicability
PDF page 2This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 767-200, -300, -300F, and -400ER series airplanes; certificated in any category; as identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28-0105, Revision 1, dated February 6, 2013.
(d) Subject
PDF page 2Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28, Fuel.
(e) Unsafe Condition
PDF page 2This AD was prompted by reports indicating that a standard access door was located where an impact-resistant access door was required, and stencils were missing from some impact-resistant access doors. We are issuing this AD to prevent foreign object penetration of the fuel tank from uncontained engine failure or tire debris, which could cause a fuel leak near an ignition source (e.g., hot brakes or engine nozzle), consequently leading to a fuel-fed fire.
(f) Compliance
PDF page 2Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done.
(g) Inspections
PDF page 2Within 72 months after the effective date of this AD, do the actions specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28-0105, Revision 1, dated February 6, 2013.
(1) Do either a general visual inspection or ultrasonic non-destructive test of the left- and right-hand wing fuel tank access doors to determine whether impact-resistant access doors are installed in the correct locations. If any standard access door is found, before further flight, replace with an impact-resistant access door.
(2) Do a general visual inspection of the left- and right-hand wing fuel tank impact-resistant access doors to verify stencils and index markers are applied. If a stencil or index marker is missing, before further flight, apply a stencil or index marker, as applicable.
(h) Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision
PDF page 2Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate critical design configuration control limitation (CDCCL) Task 57-AWL-01, “Impact-Resistant Fuel Tank Access Door,” of Section 9, Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMRs) of Boeing 767 Maintenance Planning Data Document D622T001-9, Revision January 2013.
(i) No Alternative Actions, Intervals, and/or CDCCLs
After accomplishing the revision required by paragraph (h) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, and/or CDCCLs may be used unless the actions, intervals, and/or CDCCLs are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this AD.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
PDF page 2This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD using Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28-0105, dated January 12, 2012, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
PDF page 2(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) AMOCs for ADs 2008-11-01 R1, Amendment 39-16145 (74 FR 68515, December 28, 2009); 2010-06-10, Amendment 39-16234 (75 FR 15322, March 29, 2010); or 2011-25-05, Amendment 39-16881 (77 FR 2442, January 18, 2012); that meet the conditions specified in paragraphs (k)(4)(i) and (k)(4)(ii) of this AD are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of paragraph (h) of this AD.
(i) AMOCs that are approved after November 2, 2012.
(ii) AMOCS that include incorporation of CDCCL Task 57-AWL-01, “Impact-Resistant Fuel Tank Access Door.”
(l) Related Information
PDF page 3(1) For more information about this AD, contact Suzanne Lucier, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6438; fax: 425-917-6590; email: suzanne.lucier@faa.gov.
(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in paragraphs (m)(3) and (m)(4) of this AD.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
PDF page 3(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28-0105, Revision 1, dated February 6, 2013.
(ii) Task 57-AWL-01, “Impact-Resistant Fuel Tank Access Door,” of Section 9, Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMRs) of Boeing 767 Maintenance Planning Data Document D622T001-9, Revision January 2013.
(3) For Boeing service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Rule preamble
The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.
DatesPage 1
This AD is effective November 5, 2014.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of November 5, 2014.
AddressesPage 1
For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
For further information contactPage 1
Suzanne Lucier, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6438; fax: 425-917-6590; email: suzanne.lucier@faa.gov.
DiscussionPage 1
We issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company Model 767-200, -300, -300F, and -400ER airplanes. The SNPRM published in the Federal Register on July 2, 2014 (79 FR 37681). We preceded the SNPRM with a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that published in the Federal Register on August 12, 2013 (78 FR 48826). The NPRM proposed to require an inspection of the left-and right-hand wing fuel tank access doors to determine whether impact-resistant access doors are installed in the correct locations, and to replace incorrectly installed doors with impact-resistant access doors. The NPRM also proposed to require an inspection for stencils and index markers on impact-resistant access doors, and application of new stencils or index markers if necessary. In addition, the NPRM proposed to require revising the maintenance program to incorporate changes to the airworthiness limitations section. The NPRM was prompted by reports indicating that a standard access door was located where an impact-resistant access door was required, and stencils were missing from some impact-resistant access doors. The SNPRM proposed to revise the NPRM by adding airplanes to the applicability. We are issuing this AD to prevent foreign object penetration of the fuel tank from uncontained engine failure or tire debris, which could cause a fuel leak near an ignition source (e.g., hot brakes or engine exhaust nozzle), consequently leading to a fuel-fed fire.
CommentsPage 1
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We have considered the comments received. Boeing and FedEx Express supported the SNPRM (79 FR 37681, July 2, 2014).
ConclusionPage 1
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed, except for minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the SNPRM (79 FR 37681, July 2, 2014) for correcting the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the SNPRM (79 FR 37681, July 2, 2014).
Costs of CompliancePage 1
We estimate that this AD affects 436 airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
| Action | Labor cost | Parts cost | Cost per product | Cost on U.S. operators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inspection | Up to 7 work-hours × $85 per hour = $595 | $0 | $595 | $259,420 |
| Maintenance program revision | 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 | 0 | 85 | 37,060 |
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements that would be required based on the results of the inspection. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these replacements:
| Action | Labor cost | Parts cost | Cost per product |
|---|---|---|---|
| Replacement per door | 3 work-hours × $85 per hour = $255 | $8,000 | $8,255 |
| Stencil and index marker | 9 work-hours × $85 per hour = $765 | 0 | 765 |
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost estimate.
Authority for This RulemakingPage 2
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: “General requirements.” Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory findingsPage 2
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a “significant rule” under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Adoption of the AmendmentPage 2
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
Adoption of the amendmentPage 2
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
Affected TCDS · 1
The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.
Registered aircraft · 439
Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.
| 1982 | 4 |
|---|---|
| 1983 | 7 |
| 1984 | 9 |
| 1985 | 4 |
| 1986 | 1 |
| 1987 | 1 |
| 1988 | 4 |
| 1989 | 5 |
| 1990 | 9 |
| 1991 | 15 |
| 1992 | 21 |
| 1993 | 13 |
| 1994 | 6 |
| 1995 | 11 |
| 1996 | 9 |
| 1997 | 12 |
| 1998 | 19 |
| 1999 | 15 |
| 2000 | 25 |
| 2001 | 17 |
| 2002 | 15 |
| 2003 | 1 |
| 2004 | 2 |
| 2005 | 1 |
| 2006 | 4 |
| 2008 | 1 |
| 2010 | 5 |
| 2011 | 1 |
| 2012 | 4 |
| 2016 | 6 |
| 2017 | 10 |
| 2018 | 17 |
| 2019 | 20 |
| 2020 | 20 |
| 2021 | 18 |
| 2022 | 16 |
| 2023 | 17 |
| 2024 | 10 |
| 2025 | 15 |
| 2026 | 10 |
39 with no year recorded