AD 2026-12-06

Airworthiness directive · Turbine Section · Rolls-Royce Deutschland Trent 1000-AE3, Trent 1000-CE3, Trent 1000-D3 and 10 more

Effective
June 30, 2026
Published
June 15, 2026 · 91 FR 35876–35879
Issued
June 4, 2026
Supersedes
AD2020-05-01
Models
Trent 1000-AE3, Trent 1000-CE3, Trent 1000-D3, Trent 1000-G3, Trent 1000-H3, Trent 1000-J3 and 7 more
Data sheet
TCDSE00076EN
Registered aircraft
16 matched by model
Product
Aircraft · Large airplane
ATA chapter
72 · Engine
Amendment
39-23376
Docket
FAA-2026-4655
Project
MCAI-2025-01553-E
Issued as
Final rule; request for comments

Unofficial copy from the Federal Register XML, document 2026-11965. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed June 15, 2026.

On this page

Summary

The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2020-05-01, which applied to all Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) Model Trent 1000-AE3, Trent 1000-CE3, Trent 1000-D3, Trent 1000-G3, Trent 1000-H3, Trent 1000-J3, Trent 1000-K3, Trent 1000-L3, Trent 1000-M3, Trent 1000-N3, Trent 1000-P3, Trent 1000-Q3, and Trent 1000-R3 engines. AD 2020-05-01 required initial and repetitive borescope inspections (BSI) of the high-pressure turbine (HPT) blades. AD 2020-05-01 also required replacement of HPT blades with parts eligible for installation when the HPT blades fail inspection or reach the new life limit. Since the FAA issued AD 2020-05-01, RRD published updated service material introducing improved HPT blades and a combustion rear inner casing bypass case assembly, adding an acceptable method for installation of HPT blades, expanding the inspection area for BSIs of the HPT blade, adding limits for axial cracks of the HPT blades, reducing certain BSI thresholds, and removing a certain HPT blade life-limit. This AD requires performing initial and repetitive BSIs of the HPT blades for axial cracks and, depending on the results of the BSIs, this AD requires either performing additional BSIs or replacing the HPT blades. This AD also adds an optional terminating action for the repetitive BSIs of the HPT blades. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

The airworthiness directive

2026-12-06 Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG: Amendment 39-23376; Docket No. FAA-2026-4655; Project Identifier MCAI-2025-01553-E.

(a) Effective Date

PDF page 3

This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective June 30, 2026.

(b) Affected ADs

PDF page 3

This AD replaces AD 2020-05-01, Amendment 39-21102 (85 FR 13727, March 10, 2020) (AD 2020-05-01).

(c) Applicability

PDF page 3

This AD applies to all Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) Trent 1000-AE3, Trent 1000-CE3, Trent 1000-D3, Trent 1000-G3, Trent 1000-H3, Trent 1000-J3, Trent 1000-K3, Trent 1000-L3, Trent 1000-M3, Trent 1000-N3, Trent 1000-P3, Trent 1000-Q3, and Trent 1000-R3 model engines.

(d) Subject

PDF page 3

Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7250, Turbine Section.

(e) Unsafe Condition

PDF page 3

This AD was prompted by the manufacturer identifying that the high-pressure turbine (HPT) blades may fail prematurely. The FAA is issuing this AD to prevent failure of the HPT blades. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result in failure of one or more engines, loss of thrust control, and loss of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

PDF page 3

Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

PDF page 3

Except as specified in paragraph (h) and (i) of this AD: Perform all required actions within the compliance times specified in, and in accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2025-0206R1, dated December 18, 2025 (EASA AD 2025-0206R1).

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2025-0206R1

PDF page 3

(1) Where EASA AD 2025-0206R1 refers to October 6, 2025 (the effective date of EASA AD 2025-0206R1 at original issue), this AD requires using the effective date of this AD.

(2) Where EASA AD 2025-0206R1 refers to May 20, 2019 (the effective date of EASA AD 2019-0099), this AD requires using the effective date of March 25, 2020 (the effective date of AD 2020-05-01).

(3) This AD does not adopt the “Remarks” paragraph of EASA AD 2025-0206R1.

(i) No Reporting Requirement

PDF page 3

Although the material referenced in EASA AD 2025-0206R1 specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD does not include that requirement.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

PDF page 3

(1) The Manager, AIR-520 Continued Operational Safety Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the AIR-520 Continued Operational Safety Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (k) of this AD and email to AMOC@faa.gov.

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office.

(k) Additional Information

PDF page 3

For more information about this AD, contact Alexis Whitaker, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198; phone: (516) 228-7309; email: alexis.j.whitaker@faa.gov.

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

PDF page 3

(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the material listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.

(2) You must use this material as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.

(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2025-0206R1, dated December 18, 2025.

(ii) [Reserved]

(3) For EASA material identified in this AD, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; phone: +49 221 8999 000; email: ADs@easa.europa.eu; website: easa.europa.eu. You may find this material on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu.

(4) You may view this material at the FAA, Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (817) 222-5110.

(5) You may view this material at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@nara.gov.

Rule preamble

The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.

DatesPage 2

This AD is effective June 30, 2026.

The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of June 30, 2026.

The FAA must receive comments on this AD by July 30, 2026.

AddressesPage 2

You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• Fax: (202) 493-2251.

• Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2026-4655; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, the mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed above.

Material Incorporated by Reference:

• For European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) material identified in this AD, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; phone: +49 221 8999 000; email: ADs@easa.europa.eu; website: easa.europa.eu. You may find this material on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu.

• You may view this material at the FAA, Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (817) 222-5110. It is also available at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2026-4655.

For further information contactPage 2

Alexis Whitaker, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198; phone: (516) 228-7309; email: alexis.j.whitaker@faa.gov.

Comments invitedPage 2

The FAA invites you to send any written data, views, or arguments about this final rule. Send your comments using a method listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include “Docket No. FAA-2026-4655; Project Identifier MCAI-2025-01553-E” at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the final rule, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this final rule because of those comments.

Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR 11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact received about this final rule.

Confidential business informationPage 2

CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public disclosure. If your comments responsive to this AD contain commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to this AD, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing CBI as “PROPIN.” The FAA will treat such marked submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public docket of this AD. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Alexis Whitaker, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking.

BackgroundPage 2

The FAA issued AD 2020-05-01, Amendment 39-21102 (85 FR 13727, March 10, 2020) (AD 2020-05-01), for RRD Model Trent 1000-AE3, Trent 1000-CE3, Trent 1000-D3, Trent 1000-G3, Trent 1000-H3, Trent 1000-J3, Trent 1000-K3, Trent 1000-L3, Trent 1000-M3, Trent 1000-N3, Trent 1000-P3, Trent 1000-Q3, and Trent 1000-R3 engines. AD 2020-05-01 was prompted by an MCAI originated by EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union. EASA issued AD 2019-0099R2, dated September 6, 2019 (EASA AD 2019-0099R2), to correct an unsafe condition identified as premature failure of the HPT blades. AD 2020-05-01 required initial and repetitive BSIs of the HPT blades, and replacement of the HPT blades with parts eligible for installation when the HPT blades fail inspection or reach the new life limit. The FAA issued AD 2020-05-01 to prevent failure of the HPT blades.

Actions Since AD 2020-05-01 Was IssuedPage 2

Since the FAA issued AD 2020-05-01, EASA superseded EASA AD 2019-0099R2 and issued a series of ADs, each superseding the previous one, with the latest one being EASA AD 2025-0206R1, dated December 18, 2025 (EASA AD 2025-0206R1) (also referred to as the MCAI). Since EASA AD 2019-0099R2 was published, RRD published updated service material introducing improved HPT blades and an improved combustion rear inner casing bypass case assembly, and an additional acceptable method for installing HPT blades. RRD also published updated service material defining additional limits for axial cracks on the leading edge and convex surfaces of the HPT blades, reducing the inspections threshold, and removing certain life-limits for HPT blades. It was also determined that certain in-flight shutdown events do not represent an abnormal or unsafe condition for the remaining running engine, and certain engines should be excluded from the requirement to accomplish a BSI when the opposite engine was deliberately shut-down and automatically re-started immediately as part of a standard airplane acceptance test. The MCAI states that in-service experience has shown that the affected parts may deteriorate, despite being subject to the inspections and life-limits as specified in the current RRD Time Limits Manual, T-Trent-10RRT, Chapters 05-10 and 05-20. To address this potential unsafe condition, the MCAI requires performing initial and repetitive BSIs of the HPT blades for axial cracks and, depending on the results of the BSIs, the MCAI requires either performing additional BSIs or replacing the HPT blades. The MCAI also excludes certain engines from certain BSI requirements if that engine was deliberately shut-down and automatically re-started immediately as part of a standard airplane acceptance test. The MCAI also adds an optional terminating action for the repetitive BSIs of the HPT blades.

You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2026-4655.

Material Incorporated by Reference Under 1 CFR Part 51Page 3

The FAA reviewed EASA AD 2025-0206R1, which defines additional limits for axial cracks on the leading edge and convex surfaces of the HPT blades, reduces the inspections threshold, specifies optional procedures for introducing improved HPT blades and an improved combustion rear inner casing bypass case assembly, and an additional acceptable method for replacing HPT blades, if necessary.

This material is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's DeterminationPage 3

These products have been approved by the civil aviation authority (CAA) of another country and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, that authority has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI referenced above. The FAA is issuing this AD after determining that the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

AD RequirementsPage 3

This AD requires accomplishing the actions specified in EASA AD 2025-0206R1 described previously, as incorporated by reference, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this AD.

Explanation of Required Compliance InformationPage 3

In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD process, the FAA developed a process to use some CAA ADs as the primary source of information for compliance with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has been coordinating this process with manufacturers and CAAs. As a result, EASA AD 2025-0206R1 is incorporated by reference in this AD. This AD requires compliance with EASA AD 2025-0206R1 in its entirety through that incorporation, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this AD. Using common terms that are the same as the heading of a particular section in EASA AD 2025-0206R1 does not mean that operators need comply only with that section. For example, where the AD requirement refers to “all required actions and compliance times,” compliance with this AD requirement is not limited to the section titled “Required Action(s) and Compliance Time(s)” in EASA AD 2025-0206R1. Material required by EASA AD 2025-0206R1 for compliance will be available at regulations.gov by under Docket No. FAA-2026-4655 after this AD is published.

Justification for Immediate Adoption and Determination of the Effective DatePage 3

Section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.) authorizes agencies to dispense with notice and comment procedures for rules when the agency, for “good cause,” finds that those procedures are “impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.” Under this section, an agency, upon finding good cause, may issue a final rule without providing notice and seeking comment prior to issuance. Further, section 553(d) of the APA authorizes agencies to make rules effective in less than thirty days, upon a finding of good cause.

The FAA justifies waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because no domestic operators use this product. It is unlikely that the FAA will receive any adverse comments or useful information about this AD from any U.S. operator. Accordingly, notice and opportunity for prior public comment are unnecessary, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b). In addition, for the foregoing reason(s), the FAA finds that good cause exists pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d) for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.

Regulatory flexibility actPage 3

The requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) do not apply when an agency finds good cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt a rule without prior notice and comment. Because FAA has determined that it has good cause to adopt this rule without prior notice and comment, RFA analysis is not required.

Costs of CompliancePage 3

There are no costs of compliance with this AD because there are no engines with this type certificate on the U.S. Registry.

Authority for This RulemakingPage 3

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory findingsPage 3

This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:

(1) Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866, and

(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska.

The amendmentPage 3

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

Adoption of the amendmentPage 3

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by:

a. Removing Airworthiness Directive 2020-05-01, Amendment 39-21102 (85 FR 13727, March 10, 2020); and

b. Adding the following new airworthiness directive:

Affected TCDS · 1

The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.

Registered aircraft · 16

Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.

By aircraft maker
  • Boeing16 aircraft
By year built
20102026
Registered aircraft by year built: 16 aircraft
20102
20145
20154
20163
20181
20261

By model

Aircraft

See all 16 aircraft