19960625022509I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Piper PA-22-150 · Wasilla, AK · June 25, 1996

Date
June 25, 1996 · 12:00 local
Place
Wasilla, AK
Airport
Wasilla Airport
Phase of flight
Ground Taxi, Other Airplane
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N7241D
Reported as
Piper PA22150
Reported engine
Lycoming O320E2D
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
3,000 total650 in this make and model40 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

Narrative: I examined the incident site, interviewed Mr. Ray block, fixed base operator of ray's flying service, and one of his employees, Mr. James francois, concerning the propeller strike of N7241D. (See enclosed statements and photos). After close examination of the incident site, it is my opinion that the traffic advisory signs in their present form, are a hazard to taxiing aircraft. The signs need to be constructed of materials which would not be detrimental to aircraft if impacted. The roads and taxiways are not clearly defined, and in some cases, a road is needed to reach a taxiway. Taxi from the tie down ramp to the road/taxiway necessitates a little climb over a hump for entry. In the case of tail draggers, the nose also rises more. Restricting further visibility forward. I recommend signs become more visible by placement or size, and be constructed of materials that would not damage an aircraft if impacted by a taxiing aircraft. I find no far's violated in this incident. ASI contacted the airport operator with the proposed changes to the signs.

As the FAA filed it

NARRATIVE: I EXAMINED THE INCIDENT SITE, INTERVIEWED MR. RAY BLOCK, FIXED BASE OPERATOR OF RAY'S FLYING SERVICE, AND ONE OF HIS EMPLOYEES, MR. JAMES FRANCOIS, CONCERNING THE PROPELLER STRIKE OF N7241D. (SEE ENCLOSED STATEMENTS AND PHOTOS). AFTER CLOSE EXAMINATION OF THE INCIDENT SITE, IT IS MY OPINION THAT THE TRAFFIC ADVISORY SIGNS IN THEIR PRESENT FORM, ARE A HAZARD TO TAXIING AIRCRAFT. THE SIGNS NEED TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIALS WHICH WOULD NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO AIRCRAFT IF IMPACTED. THE ROADS AND TAXIWAYS ARE NOT CLEARLY DEFINED, AND IN SOME CASES, A ROAD IS NEEDED TO REACH A TAXIWAY. TAXI FROM THE TIE DOWN RAMP TO THE ROAD/TAXIWAY NECESSITATES A LITTLE CLIMB OVER A HUMP FOR ENTRY. IN THE CASE OF TAIL DRAGGERS, THE NOSE ALSO RISES MORE. RESTRICTING FURTHER VISIBILITY FORWARD. I RECOMMEND SIGNS BECOME MORE VISIBLE BY PLACEMENT OR SIZE, AND BE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIALS THAT WOULD NOT DAMAGE AN AIRCRAFT IF IMPACTED BY A TAXIING AIRCRAFT. I FIND NO FAR'S VIOLATED IN THIS INCIDENT. ASI CONTACTED THE AIRPORT OPERATOR WITH THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE SIGNS.

Other reports on N7241D · 1

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.