What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
Departed IFR. Requested return. Broke out angle to runway. Dragged wing landing. Pitot cover still on.m (-23) pilot departed runway 35L at dwh airport into IFR conditions of 300 overcast and 1 mile visibility. He stated that he never saw more than 60 knots of airspeed at any time. He took off and immediately requested a return for landing. He entered right downwind for 35L at dwh. Upon landing on 35L, he damaged the left wing and left propeller. The observed weather after landing was 100 overcast and 1 mile visibility. Upon taxiing to the ramp, he stated he saw the pitot cover still on the pitot tube.
As the FAA filed it
DEPARTED IFR. REQUESTED RETURN. BROKE OUT ANGLE TO RUNWAY. DRAGGED WING LANDING. PITOT COVER STILL ON.M (-23) PILOT DEPARTED RUNWAY 35L AT DWH AIRPORT INTO IFR CONDITIONS OF 300 OVERCAST AND 1 MILE VISIBILITY. HE STATED THAT HE NEVER SAW MORE THAN 60 KNOTS OF AIRSPEED AT ANY TIME. HE TOOK OFF AND IMMEDIATELY REQUESTED A RETURN FOR LANDING. HE ENTERED RIGHT DOWNWIND FOR 35L AT DWH. UPON LANDING ON 35L, HE DAMAGED THE LEFT WING AND LEFT PROPELLER. THE OBSERVED WEATHER AFTER LANDING WAS 100 OVERCAST AND 1 MILE VISIBILITY. UPON TAXIING TO THE RAMP, HE STATED HE SAW THE PITOT COVER STILL ON THE PITOT TUBE.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N7890R · 2
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.