What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
On may 27, 1997, approximately 1030 mountain daylight time, a noe SA-300 experimental biplane, n`923S, nosed over after departing the side of the runway at Bountiful Skypark, Utah. The private pilot, who was the sole occupant, was not injured, but the aircraft, which was owned and operated by the pilot, sustained substantial damage. The 14 CFR part 91 local personal pleasure flight had been in the air about 30 minutes at the time of the accident. No flight plan had been filed, and the flight was being condurcted in visual meteorological conditions. According to the pilot, he excuted a full stall landing, and during the landing roll, the aircraft moved to the right side of the runway where its right main gear hit a pool of water on the run way surface. This pulled the aircraft further to the right, and the pilot was unable to keep it from departing the right side of the runway. After departing the runway, the aircraft entered an area of soft dirt and flipped over. A review of the pilots log revealed that he had been receiving dual instruction in the aircraft for about 60 days prior to the accident. During that period of time, he had logged over 220 landings, and had received his conventional gear/tailwheel endorsement after a flight that had occurred earlier on the day of the accident.
As the FAA filed it
ON MAY 27, 1997, APPROXIMATELY 1030 MOUNTAIN DAYLIGHT TIME, A NOE SA-300 EXPERIMENTAL BIPLANE, N`923S, NOSED OVER AFTER DEPARTING THE SIDE OF THE RUNWAY AT BOUNTIFUL SKYPARK, UTAH. THE PRIVATE PILOT, WHO WAS THE SOLE OCCUPANT, WAS NOT INJURED, BUT THE AIRCRAFT, WHICH WAS OWNED AND OPERATED BY THE PILOT, SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE. THE 14 CFR PART 91 LOCAL PERSONAL PLEASURE FLIGHT HAD BEEN IN THE AIR ABOUT 30 MINUTES AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT. NO FLIGHT PLAN HAD BEEN FILED, AND THE FLIGHT WAS BEING CONDURCTED IN VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS. ACCORDING TO THE PILOT, HE EXCUTED A FULL STALL LANDING, AND DURING THE LANDING ROLL, THE AIRCRAFT MOVED TO THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE RUNWAY WHERE ITS RIGHT MAIN GEAR HIT A POOL OF WATER ON THE RUN WAY SURFACE. THIS PULLED THE AIRCRAFT FURTHER TO THE RIGHT, AND THE PILOT WAS UNABLE TO KEEP IT FROM DEPARTING THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE RUNWAY. AFTER DEPARTING THE RUNWAY, THE AIRCRAFT ENTERED AN AREA OF SOFT DIRT AND FLIPPED OVER. A REVIEW OF THE PILOTS LOG REVEALED THAT HE HAD BEEN RECEIVING DUAL INSTRUCTION IN THE AIRCRAFT FOR ABOUT 60 DAYS PRIOR TO THE ACCIDENT. DURING THAT PERIOD OF TIME, HE HAD LOGGED OVER 220 LANDINGS, AND HAD RECEIVED HIS CONVENTIONAL GEAR/TAILWHEEL ENDORSEMENT AFTER A FLIGHT THAT HAD OCCURRED EARLIER ON THE DAY OF THE ACCIDENT.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N1923S · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.