What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-16) After endorsing the student pilot for solo flight in the ottumwa airport traffic pattern, the CFI went into the building and was reading a magazine when the student, on the second landing attempt came in too flat and too slow. This procedure ended in the aircraft bouncing twice on the nose wheel with the landing again finding the nose wheel first. The damage to the aircraft included the nose strut, firewall and the floor boards of the cabin area. If the student was having difficulty on the first approach to landing, the CFI would have been able to assist or stop the flight at that point. Instead, the CFI was in the building at the time and did not see or hear of the accident until the student entered the building after the accident occurred.
As the FAA filed it
(-16) AFTER ENDORSING THE STUDENT PILOT FOR SOLO FLIGHT IN THE OTTUMWA AIRPORT TRAFFIC PATTERN, THE CFI WENT INTO THE BUILDING AND WAS READING A MAGAZINE WHEN THE STUDENT, ON THE SECOND LANDING ATTEMPT CAME IN TOO FLAT AND TOO SLOW. THIS PROCEDURE ENDED IN THE AIRCRAFT BOUNCING TWICE ON THE NOSE WHEEL WITH THE LANDING AGAIN FINDING THE NOSE WHEEL FIRST. THE DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT INCLUDED THE NOSE STRUT, FIREWALL AND THE FLOOR BOARDS OF THE CABIN AREA. IF THE STUDENT WAS HAVING DIFFICULTY ON THE FIRST APPROACH TO LANDING, THE CFI WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO ASSIST OR STOP THE FLIGHT AT THAT POINT. INSTEAD, THE CFI WAS IN THE BUILDING AT THE TIME AND DID NOT SEE OR HEAR OF THE ACCIDENT UNTIL THE STUDENT ENTERED THE BUILDING AFTER THE ACCIDENT OCCURRED.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N733FT · 2
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.