What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) The acknowledged pilot-in-command and the second pilot, who is a pilot examiner, were practicing commercial maneuvers and allowing the second pilot to become more familiar with the aircraft. After landing, the second pilot taxied the aircraft to the end of the runway in preparation for takeoff. At this point there was confusion about who had control of the aircraft as both pilots stated they thought the other one was flying the aircraft during the short field takeoff. Shortly after rotation, the right dropped and contacted the ground causing the aircraft to veer to the right and land in the cornfield. Both pilots stated that there was a momentary loss of power at, or shortly after, rotation; however our investigation determined the engine was developing a substantial amount power when the aircraft contacted the ground. (.4) the pilot said that there was a loss of engine power during initial climb after takeoff. He said that the airplane turned to the right in a nose up attitude, stalled, and impacted the terrain. An examination of the airplane after the accident failed to reveal any mechanical anomalies with the engine or flight controls.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) THE ACKNOWLEDGED PILOT-IN-COMMAND AND THE SECOND PILOT, WHO IS A PILOT EXAMINER, WERE PRACTICING COMMERCIAL MANEUVERS AND ALLOWING THE SECOND PILOT TO BECOME MORE FAMILIAR WITH THE AIRCRAFT. AFTER LANDING, THE SECOND PILOT TAXIED THE AIRCRAFT TO THE END OF THE RUNWAY IN PREPARATION FOR TAKEOFF. AT THIS POINT THERE WAS CONFUSION ABOUT WHO HAD CONTROL OF THE AIRCRAFT AS BOTH PILOTS STATED THEY THOUGHT THE OTHER ONE WAS FLYING THE AIRCRAFT DURING THE SHORT FIELD TAKEOFF. SHORTLY AFTER ROTATION, THE RIGHT DROPPED AND CONTACTED THE GROUND CAUSING THE AIRCRAFT TO VEER TO THE RIGHT AND LAND IN THE CORNFIELD. BOTH PILOTS STATED THAT THERE WAS A MOMENTARY LOSS OF POWER AT, OR SHORTLY AFTER, ROTATION; HOWEVER OUR INVESTIGATION DETERMINED THE ENGINE WAS DEVELOPING A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT POWER WHEN THE AIRCRAFT CONTACTED THE GROUND. (.4) THE PILOT SAID THAT THERE WAS A LOSS OF ENGINE POWER DURING INITIAL CLIMB AFTER TAKEOFF. HE SAID THAT THE AIRPLANE TURNED TO THE RIGHT IN A NOSE UP ATTITUDE, STALLED, AND IMPACTED THE TERRAIN. AN EXAMINATION OF THE AIRPLANE AFTER THE ACCIDENT FAILED TO REVEAL ANY MECHANICAL ANOMALIES WITH THE ENGINE OR FLIGHT CONTROLS.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N5101W · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.