What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) On June 24, 1999, at approx. 1740 hrs. Local, an ATR-72, N722TE, operating as a 14 CFR 121 flight taxied into the ramp at Birmingham Airport. Another ATR-72 was parked in the ramp and the ground marshaller and wing walker directed the captain into his parking spot. While taxiing the wing walker erred in his estimation of the available wing clearance, and directed the captain to continue taxiing when he should have had the plane stop. The ATR-72 right wing tip navlight made contact with the parked ATR-72'S left wingtip, the navlight lens cover on the moving ATR-72 was damaged but there was no further damage. Both airplanes were inspected and the part was replaced. This WA not a pilot or a captain error but rather a ground personnel error.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) ON JUNE 24, 1999, AT APPROX. 1740 HRS. LOCAL, AN ATR-72, N722TE, OPERATING AS A 14 CFR 121 FLIGHT TAXIED INTO THE RAMP AT BIRMINGHAM AIRPORT. ANOTHER ATR-72 WAS PARKED IN THE RAMP AND THE GROUND MARSHALLER AND WING WALKER DIRECTED THE CAPTAIN INTO HIS PARKING SPOT. WHILE TAXIING THE WING WALKER ERRED IN HIS ESTIMATION OF THE AVAILABLE WING CLEARANCE, AND DIRECTED THE CAPTAIN TO CONTINUE TAXIING WHEN HE SHOULD HAVE HAD THE PLANE STOP. THE ATR-72 RIGHT WING TIP NAVLIGHT MADE CONTACT WITH THE PARKED ATR-72'S LEFT WINGTIP, THE NAVLIGHT LENS COVER ON THE MOVING ATR-72 WAS DAMAGED BUT THERE WAS NO FURTHER DAMAGE. BOTH AIRPLANES WERE INSPECTED AND THE PART WAS REPLACED. THIS WA NOT A PILOT OR A CAPTAIN ERROR BUT RATHER A GROUND PERSONNEL ERROR.