19991020047429A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Piper PA-24-250 · Bozeman, MT · October 20, 1999

Date
October 20, 1999 · 10:00 local
Place
Bozeman, MT
Airport
Gallatin Fld
Phase of flight
Sfl Final Approach
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N8078P
NTSB investigation
NTSBSEA00LA006
Reported as
Piper PA24250
Reported engine
Lycoming O540A1D5
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
3,392 total66 in this make and model69 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(.4) The private pilot, whose flight review had expired, was in the process of completing a flight review recurrency flight, when the instructor reduced the power and asked him to execute a simulated forced landing. As he stretched the glide in an attempt to make it to the approach end of the runway, the airspeed became lower than normal approach speed. Although the aircraft was able to reach the end of the runway, just after it crossed the threshold, it dropped onto the runway with sufficient force to cause substantial damage. Although the airspeed had slowed below normal approach speed as the aircraft neared the approach end of the runway, the instructor pilot did not add power, nor did she call for termination of the simulated forced landing exercise. (-23) dual instruction situation--pic/cfi in right seat ("pnf" pilot-not-flying), bfr applicant in left seat ("pf" pilot-flying, bfr expired): pnf marshall initiated simulated forced landing in bzn rwy 21 traffic pattern. Pf hoenig stated he thought he could not glide to runway, but said nothing to CFI. CFI states she first added power to extend glide, then reduced it agai n. pf hoenig stated he tried to "stretch the glide" (applied back pressure) just as pnf reduced power. Resulting airspeed loss reportedly precipitated a high rate of sink, followed by the hard landing. CFI declined to grant bfr endorsement. Right landing gear and wing damaged; engine mount bent. Both pilots stated minor injuries consisted of only sore muscles.

As the FAA filed it

(.4) THE PRIVATE PILOT, WHOSE FLIGHT REVIEW HAD EXPIRED, WAS IN THE PROCESS OF COMPLETING A FLIGHT REVIEW RECURRENCY FLIGHT, WHEN THE INSTRUCTOR REDUCED THE POWER AND ASKED HIM TO EXECUTE A SIMULATED FORCED LANDING. AS HE STRETCHED THE GLIDE IN AN ATTEMPT TO MAKE IT TO THE APPROACH END OF THE RUNWAY, THE AIRSPEED BECAME LOWER THAN NORMAL APPROACH SPEED. ALTHOUGH THE AIRCRAFT WAS ABLE TO REACH THE END OF THE RUNWAY, JUST AFTER IT CROSSED THE THRESHOLD, IT DROPPED ONTO THE RUNWAY WITH SUFFICIENT FORCE TO CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE. ALTHOUGH THE AIRSPEED HAD SLOWED BELOW NORMAL APPROACH SPEED AS THE AIRCRAFT NEARED THE APPROACH END OF THE RUNWAY, THE INSTRUCTOR PILOT DID NOT ADD POWER, NOR DID SHE CALL FOR TERMINATION OF THE SIMULATED FORCED LANDING EXERCISE. (-23) DUAL INSTRUCTION SITUATION--PIC/CFI IN RIGHT SEAT ("PNF" PILOT-NOT-FLYING), BFR APPLICANT IN LEFT SEAT ("PF" PILOT-FLYING, BFR EXPIRED): PNF MARSHALL INITIATED SIMULATED FORCED LANDING IN BZN RWY 21 TRAFFIC PATTERN. PF HOENIG STATED HE THOUGHT HE COULD NOT GLIDE TO RUNWAY, BUT SAID NOTHING TO CFI. CFI STATES SHE FIRST ADDED POWER TO EXTEND GLIDE, THEN REDUCED IT AGAI N. PF HOENIG STATED HE TRIED TO "STRETCH THE GLIDE" (APPLIED BACK PRESSURE) JUST AS PNF REDUCED POWER. RESULTING AIRSPEED LOSS REPORTEDLY PRECIPITATED A HIGH RATE OF SINK, FOLLOWED BY THE HARD LANDING. CFI DECLINED TO GRANT BFR ENDORSEMENT. RIGHT LANDING GEAR AND WING DAMAGED; ENGINE MOUNT BENT. BOTH PILOTS STATED MINOR INJURIES CONSISTED OF ONLY SORE MUSCLES.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.

Other reports on N8078P · 1

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.