19991124036379I

Incident

FAA incident report · Amrgen AA-5A · Burbank, CA · November 24, 1999

Date
November 24, 1999 · 13:20 local
Place
Burbank, CA
Airport
Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airp
Phase of flight
Final Approach
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Aircraft
N26855
Reported as
Amrgen AA5A
Reported engine
Lycoming O320*
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) Mr. Hanes stated that he was flying his aircraft from tucson, AZ to burbvank, CA and enroute approximately 30 miles east of Burbank airport (bur) when approach control asked him to deviate toward the south. He explained to them that he'd rather not go FAR off a direct course to bur because fuel may be a problem. He did not declare an emergency or priority handling. During the telephone interview with Mr. Haynes, I found his preflight planning and his flight performance apparently satisfactory. He landed with more than the regulatory requirements for VFR reserves. There was no apparent compromise with safety in this incident and this file is being closed with no further action nor comment.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) MR. HANES STATED THAT HE WAS FLYING HIS AIRCRAFT FROM TUCSON, AZ TO BURBVANK, CA AND ENROUTE APPROXIMATELY 30 MILES EAST OF BURBANK AIRPORT (BUR) WHEN APPROACH CONTROL ASKED HIM TO DEVIATE TOWARD THE SOUTH. HE EXPLAINED TO THEM THAT HE'D RATHER NOT GO FAR OFF A DIRECT COURSE TO BUR BECAUSE FUEL MAY BE A PROBLEM. HE DID NOT DECLARE AN EMERGENCY OR PRIORITY HANDLING. DURING THE TELEPHONE INTERVIEW WITH MR. HAYNES, I FOUND HIS PREFLIGHT PLANNING AND HIS FLIGHT PERFORMANCE APPARENTLY SATISFACTORY. HE LANDED WITH MORE THAN THE REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR VFR RESERVES. THERE WAS NO APPARENT COMPROMISE WITH SAFETY IN THIS INCIDENT AND THIS FILE IS BEING CLOSED WITH NO FURTHER ACTION NOR COMMENT.