19991201040159I

Incident

FAA incident report · Doug MD-88 · Pittsburgh, PA · December 1, 1999

Date
December 1, 1999 · 16:28 local
Place
Pittsburgh, PA
Airport
Greater Pittsburgh International
Phase of flight
Normal Cruise
Operating rules
Air carrier (Part 121)
Operator
DALA
Aircraft
N926DL
Reported as
Doug MD88
Reported engine
Pratt & Whitney JT8D219
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
12,685 total2,037 in this make and model212 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-5) On December 1, 1999, at 16:28 local time, delta airlines flight #1940, a MD-88 airplane, was enroute from cincinnati, oh (cvg), to providence rhode island (pvd), and made a diversion to the Pittsburgh international airport (pit). The diversion was made because of fumes in the cabin area and several passengers were complaining of headache and nausea. The flight landed at (pit), and taxied to the gate without incident where passengers were treated and released by paramedics. Maintenance personnel inspected the airplane at (pit) to find a chemical deodorizer smell in the aft section of the airplane that could have been the source of the fumes. The airplane was then ferried to cincinnati for further inspection and repair. Cardinal laboratories, inc., cincinnati, oh performed an intensive mass spectrometer analysis of the carpets to determine if this was the source of fumes that caused the passengers to become ill. Chief chemist, dominic d. ruschman, of cardinal laboratories, inc. performed the analysis and stated the following in his report. I am not questioning wheter someone became ill. Whether or not someone became ill does not rest within the parameters of my investigation. It does rest within the scope of this investigation to conclude that the carpets were not responsible for, nor capable of causation of illness. This investigation has not yet concluded the reasons why the passengers of delta flight #1940 became ill. As additional information is received at this office, it will be promptly forwarded to the region as an amendment to this form. Supportive documentation to this 8020-23 is also enclosed.

As the FAA filed it

(-5) ON DECEMBER 1, 1999, AT 16:28 LOCAL TIME, DELTA AIRLINES FLIGHT #1940, A MD-88 AIRPLANE, WAS ENROUTE FROM CINCINNATI, OH (CVG), TO PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND (PVD), AND MADE A DIVERSION TO THE PITTSBURGH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (PIT). THE DIVERSION WAS MADE BECAUSE OF FUMES IN THE CABIN AREA AND SEVERAL PASSENGERS WERE COMPLAINING OF HEADACHE AND NAUSEA. THE FLIGHT LANDED AT (PIT), AND TAXIED TO THE GATE WITHOUT INCIDENT WHERE PASSENGERS WERE TREATED AND RELEASED BY PARAMEDICS. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL INSPECTED THE AIRPLANE AT (PIT) TO FIND A CHEMICAL DEODORIZER SMELL IN THE AFT SECTION OF THE AIRPLANE THAT COULD HAVE BEEN THE SOURCE OF THE FUMES. THE AIRPLANE WAS THEN FERRIED TO CINCINNATI FOR FURTHER INSPECTION AND REPAIR. CARDINAL LABORATORIES, INC., CINCINNATI, OH PERFORMED AN INTENSIVE MASS SPECTROMETER ANALYSIS OF THE CARPETS TO DETERMINE IF THIS WAS THE SOURCE OF FUMES THAT CAUSED THE PASSENGERS TO BECOME ILL. CHIEF CHEMIST, DOMINIC D. RUSCHMAN, OF CARDINAL LABORATORIES, INC. PERFORMED THE ANALYSIS AND STATED THE FOLLOWING IN HIS REPORT. I AM NOT QUESTIONING WHETER SOMEONE BECAME ILL. WHETHER OR NOT SOMEONE BECAME ILL DOES NOT REST WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF MY INVESTIGATION. IT DOES REST WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THIS INVESTIGATION TO CONCLUDE THAT THE CARPETS WERE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR, NOR CAPABLE OF CAUSATION OF ILLNESS. THIS INVESTIGATION HAS NOT YET CONCLUDED THE REASONS WHY THE PASSENGERS OF DELTA FLIGHT #1940 BECAME ILL. AS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS RECEIVED AT THIS OFFICE, IT WILL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE REGION AS AN AMENDMENT TO THIS FORM. SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTATION TO THIS 8020-23 IS ALSO ENCLOSED.