What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) Explaination of block 35. Aircraft was flown from the accidnet location of khqz to ktki prior to FAA notification. FAA "on scene" was limited to examination of the aircraft at ktki, after the aicrcraft was moved and not where the accidnet occured. On may 13, 2000, the 14 CFR part 61 training flight, witha CFI and studnet pilot, originated from ktki and progessed to khqz where pratice touch and go landigns were performed. During a landing, control of the aircraft was lost resulting in a hard landing. As a result, the firewall and ajoining fuselage sustained substantial damage. The CFI stated he performed a post flight inspection of the aircraft but did notnotice any damage.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) EXPLAINATION OF BLOCK 35. AIRCRAFT WAS FLOWN FROM THE ACCIDNET LOCATION OF KHQZ TO KTKI PRIOR TO FAA NOTIFICATION. FAA "ON SCENE" WAS LIMITED TO EXAMINATION OF THE AIRCRAFT AT KTKI, AFTER THE AICRCRAFT WAS MOVED AND NOT WHERE THE ACCIDNET OCCURED. ON MAY 13, 2000, THE 14 CFR PART 61 TRAINING FLIGHT, WITHA CFI AND STUDNET PILOT, ORIGINATED FROM KTKI AND PROGESSED TO KHQZ WHERE PRATICE TOUCH AND GO LANDIGNS WERE PERFORMED. DURING A LANDING, CONTROL OF THE AIRCRAFT WAS LOST RESULTING IN A HARD LANDING. AS A RESULT, THE FIREWALL AND AJOINING FUSELAGE SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE. THE CFI STATED HE PERFORMED A POST FLIGHT INSPECTION OF THE AIRCRAFT BUT DID NOTNOTICE ANY DAMAGE.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N2440L · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.