What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(.23) A/c landed approx. 200' short of runway 30 at this airport. (.4)on may 26, 2000, about 1800 eastern daylight time, a hays long-ez, N9JZ, registered to a private individual, operating as a title 14 CFR part 91 personal flight, crashed in the vicinity of Collegedale, Tennessee. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed. The airplane sustained substantial damage and the private-rated pilot and private-rated passenger were not injured. The flight originated about 10 minutes before the accident. According to the pilot, he just bought the airplane, and after about 2 hours of in-flight familiarization, two demonstrated landings by the front seated delivery pilot, and two landings conducted by himself from the back seat, he and the delivery pilot performed a full-stop landing and switched seats. The pilot stated the accident happened as a result of getting too low on final approach with speed brake deployed, and not being familiar enough with its cockpit control location and operation to retract them in a timely manner. According to an FAA inspector, the pilot stated he elected to deploy the speed brake to help slow the airplane prior to landing , and the adjustment took effect so quickly that he found himself in a low and slow condition that full power did not help. The result was that the airplane landed about 200 feet short of the runway. The speed brake handle is installed in the front seat only, and all landings prior to the accident were conducted using the speed brake.
As the FAA filed it
(.23) A/C LANDED APPROX. 200' SHORT OF RUNWAY 30 AT THIS AIRPORT. (.4)ON MAY 26, 2000, ABOUT 1800 EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME, A HAYS LONG-EZ, N9JZ, REGISTERED TO A PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL, OPERATING AS A TITLE 14 CFR PART 91 PERSONAL FLIGHT, CRASHED IN THE VICINITY OF COLLEGEDALE, TENNESSEE. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED AND NO FLIGHT PLAN WAS FILED. THE AIRPLANE SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE AND THE PRIVATE-RATED PILOT AND PRIVATE-RATED PASSENGER WERE NOT INJURED. THE FLIGHT ORIGINATED ABOUT 10 MINUTES BEFORE THE ACCIDENT. ACCORDING TO THE PILOT, HE JUST BOUGHT THE AIRPLANE, AND AFTER ABOUT 2 HOURS OF IN-FLIGHT FAMILIARIZATION, TWO DEMONSTRATED LANDINGS BY THE FRONT SEATED DELIVERY PILOT, AND TWO LANDINGS CONDUCTED BY HIMSELF FROM THE BACK SEAT, HE AND THE DELIVERY PILOT PERFORMED A FULL-STOP LANDING AND SWITCHED SEATS. THE PILOT STATED THE ACCIDENT HAPPENED AS A RESULT OF GETTING TOO LOW ON FINAL APPROACH WITH SPEED BRAKE DEPLOYED, AND NOT BEING FAMILIAR ENOUGH WITH ITS COCKPIT CONTROL LOCATION AND OPERATION TO RETRACT THEM IN A TIMELY MANNER. ACCORDING TO AN FAA INSPECTOR, THE PILOT STATED HE ELECTED TO DEPLOY THE SPEED BRAKE TO HELP SLOW THE AIRPLANE PRIOR TO LANDING , AND THE ADJUSTMENT TOOK EFFECT SO QUICKLY THAT HE FOUND HIMSELF IN A LOW AND SLOW CONDITION THAT FULL POWER DID NOT HELP. THE RESULT WAS THAT THE AIRPLANE LANDED ABOUT 200 FEET SHORT OF THE RUNWAY. THE SPEED BRAKE HANDLE IS INSTALLED IN THE FRONT SEAT ONLY, AND ALL LANDINGS PRIOR TO THE ACCIDENT WERE CONDUCTED USING THE SPEED BRAKE.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.