20000708042309A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Maule M-4-210C · AK · July 8, 2000

Date
July 8, 2000 · 16:15 local
Place
AK
Phase of flight
Fcd/Prec Ldg From Cruise
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N9855M
NTSB investigation
NTSBANC00LA084
Reported as
Maule M4210C
Pilot’s flight hours
100 total20 in this make and model20 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) During cross-country flight, engine quit. Switched tanks, restarted engine, engine quit again. Unable to restart engine. Made emergency landing on gravel bar. Investigation into this matter, revealed that the engine failed due to fuel exhaustion. The pilot was relying on a pilot weather briefing obtained from a flight service station which detailed conditions of a tail wind along his route of flight. The pilot entered an unforecast headwind and was relying on the fuel gauges for fuel management. Investigation revealed that the fuel gauges were sticking and not providing accurate information to the pilot.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) DURING CROSS-COUNTRY FLIGHT, ENGINE QUIT. SWITCHED TANKS, RESTARTED ENGINE, ENGINE QUIT AGAIN. UNABLE TO RESTART ENGINE. MADE EMERGENCY LANDING ON GRAVEL BAR. INVESTIGATION INTO THIS MATTER, REVEALED THAT THE ENGINE FAILED DUE TO FUEL EXHAUSTION. THE PILOT WAS RELYING ON A PILOT WEATHER BRIEFING OBTAINED FROM A FLIGHT SERVICE STATION WHICH DETAILED CONDITIONS OF A TAIL WIND ALONG HIS ROUTE OF FLIGHT. THE PILOT ENTERED AN UNFORECAST HEADWIND AND WAS RELYING ON THE FUEL GAUGES FOR FUEL MANAGEMENT. INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE FUEL GAUGES WERE STICKING AND NOT PROVIDING ACCURATE INFORMATION TO THE PILOT.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.