What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
On February 21, 2001, at approx. 1113 local time, a Mcdonnell Douglas 600N (helicopter), N606BP, operated by us border patrol severed it's tail boom during landing at brownfield, CA. The helicopter was substantially damaged. The helicopter was being operated public use under 14 CFR part 91. A ccording to us border patrol the pilot was receiving refresher training. He performed a run-on landing while simulating a stuck right pedal condition. The helicopter airspeed was slower than planned. The touchdown was smooth. During run out a main rotor blade contacted the tail boom. This accident is not related to a NMAC or pilot deviation. (Narrative from 8020-23) (.19)on February 21, 2001, about 1113 hours PST, a Mcdonnell Douglas 600N (helicopter), N606BP, operated by the U.S. Border patrol, severed its tail boom during landing on taxiway a at Brown field, San Diego, CA. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and a company flight plan was filed for the public use instructional flight. The helicopter was substantially daamged. Neither of the airline transport certificated pilots were injured. The flight was performed under 14 CFR part 91, and originated from the airport abou about 1045. According to the pilot who was receiving refresher training, he performed a run on landing while simulating a stuck right pedal condition. The helicopters airspeed decreased from 60 to 50 knots, which was a little slower than planned. No low rotor warning horn was heard. The touchdown was smooth. During the run out, a main rotor blade contacted the tail boom. (.4) during the landing slide, the main rotor blew back, contacted the tail boom, and severed it. The flight purpose was refresher training and the specific maneuver at the time of the accident was training in the procedure for a stuck (fixed) right pedal. According to the flight crew, there were no mechanical discrepancies with the helicopter. A run-on landing with the fixed right pedal was made to the 260-degree taxiway. The wind reported at the airport about 14 minutes after the accident was 330 degrees at 6 knots. The pilots reported that the wind was 310 degrees at 6 to 8 knots with gusts to 12 knots. According to information provided by the flight crew, the training pilot accomplished the maneuver: aligned with the runway heading with an airspeed between 55-65 knots; the instructor pilot (ip) held right peda l to induce a 10-degree right yaw; touchdown was estimated to occur about 30-40 knots; the low rotor RPM horn was "on" at or near touchdown, but the rotor speed was not noted; the collective was positioned at some point above half travel; cyclic was slightly forward of neutral; shortly after touchdown both pilots felt the main rotor strike the tail boom; directional control was lost and the helicopter rotated about 220 degrees nose right before coming to rest, upright. The manufacturer indicated that main rotor/tail boom contact from blowback of the main rotor may result from forward velocity and low/decaying main rotor RPM (advance ratio) due to a high collective position during the ground run-out phase following the 30-knot plus touchdown. The blowback condition is exacerbated by the high angle pitch setting which causes blade stall over a large portion of the rotor disk. A blowback condition is present in all helicopters. It may be more pronounced in the MD600N (versus the 500N) due to greater helicopter gross weight, reduced flare/deceleration capabilities because of tail boom length and installation angle, and the increased surface of the additional main rotor blade resulting in a more rapid decay of main rotor RPM. A caution in the helicopter's rotorcraft flight manual specifies for practice autorotation landings to avoid conditions of rotor RPM (nr) less than 60 percent with headwinds across the rotor greater than 30 knots during touchdown autorotations. These conditions during touchdown and subsequent ground slide, can lead to excessive rotor blowback, reduction in blade tip to tail boom clearance, and subsequent damage to the aircraft. Avoid these conditions by reducing collective pitch after touchdown (surface conditions permitting) and minimizing ground run.
As the FAA filed it
ON FEBRUARY 21, 2001, AT APPROX. 1113 LOCAL TIME, A MCDONNELL DOUGLAS 600N (HELICOPTER), N606BP, OPERATED BY US BORDER PATROL SEVERED IT'S TAIL BOOM DURING LANDING AT BROWNFIELD, CA. THE HELICOPTER WAS SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED. THE HELICOPTER WAS BEING OPERATED PUBLIC USE UNDER 14 CFR PART 91. A CCORDING TO US BORDER PATROL THE PILOT WAS RECEIVING REFRESHER TRAINING. HE PERFORMED A RUN-ON LANDING WHILE SIMULATING A STUCK RIGHT PEDAL CONDITION. THE HELICOPTER AIRSPEED WAS SLOWER THAN PLANNED. THE TOUCHDOWN WAS SMOOTH. DURING RUN OUT A MAIN ROTOR BLADE CONTACTED THE TAIL BOOM. THIS ACCIDENT IS NOT RELATED TO A NMAC OR PILOT DEVIATION. (NARRATIVE FROM 8020-23) (.19)ON FEBRUARY 21, 2001, ABOUT 1113 HOURS PST, A MCDONNELL DOUGLAS 600N (HELICOPTER), N606BP, OPERATED BY THE U.S. BORDER PATROL, SEVERED ITS TAIL BOOM DURING LANDING ON TAXIWAY A AT BROWN FIELD, SAN DIEGO, CA. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED AND A COMPANY FLIGHT PLAN WAS FILED FOR THE PUBLIC USE INSTRUCTIONAL FLIGHT. THE HELICOPTER WAS SUBSTANTIALLY DAAMGED. NEITHER OF THE AIRLINE TRANSPORT CERTIFICATED PILOTS WERE INJURED. THE FLIGHT WAS PERFORMED UNDER 14 CFR PART 91, AND ORIGINATED FROM THE AIRPORT ABOU ABOUT 1045. ACCORDING TO THE PILOT WHO WAS RECEIVING REFRESHER TRAINING, HE PERFORMED A RUN ON LANDING WHILE SIMULATING A STUCK RIGHT PEDAL CONDITION. THE HELICOPTERS AIRSPEED DECREASED FROM 60 TO 50 KNOTS, WHICH WAS A LITTLE SLOWER THAN PLANNED. NO LOW ROTOR WARNING HORN WAS HEARD. THE TOUCHDOWN WAS SMOOTH. DURING THE RUN OUT, A MAIN ROTOR BLADE CONTACTED THE TAIL BOOM. (.4) DURING THE LANDING SLIDE, THE MAIN ROTOR BLEW BACK, CONTACTED THE TAIL BOOM, AND SEVERED IT. THE FLIGHT PURPOSE WAS REFRESHER TRAINING AND THE SPECIFIC MANEUVER AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT WAS TRAINING IN THE PROCEDURE FOR A STUCK (FIXED) RIGHT PEDAL. ACCORDING TO THE FLIGHT CREW, THERE WERE NO MECHANICAL DISCREPANCIES WITH THE HELICOPTER. A RUN-ON LANDING WITH THE FIXED RIGHT PEDAL WAS MADE TO THE 260-DEGREE TAXIWAY. THE WIND REPORTED AT THE AIRPORT ABOUT 14 MINUTES AFTER THE ACCIDENT WAS 330 DEGREES AT 6 KNOTS. THE PILOTS REPORTED THAT THE WIND WAS 310 DEGREES AT 6 TO 8 KNOTS WITH GUSTS TO 12 KNOTS. ACCORDING TO INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE FLIGHT CREW, THE TRAINING PILOT ACCOMPLISHED THE MANEUVER: ALIGNED WITH THE RUNWAY HEADING WITH AN AIRSPEED BETWEEN 55-65 KNOTS; THE INSTRUCTOR PILOT (IP) HELD RIGHT PEDA L TO INDUCE A 10-DEGREE RIGHT YAW; TOUCHDOWN WAS ESTIMATED TO OCCUR ABOUT 30-40 KNOTS; THE LOW ROTOR RPM HORN WAS "ON" AT OR NEAR TOUCHDOWN, BUT THE ROTOR SPEED WAS NOT NOTED; THE COLLECTIVE WAS POSITIONED AT SOME POINT ABOVE HALF TRAVEL; CYCLIC WAS SLIGHTLY FORWARD OF NEUTRAL; SHORTLY AFTER TOUCHDOWN BOTH PILOTS FELT THE MAIN ROTOR STRIKE THE TAIL BOOM; DIRECTIONAL CONTROL WAS LOST AND THE HELICOPTER ROTATED ABOUT 220 DEGREES NOSE RIGHT BEFORE COMING TO REST, UPRIGHT. THE MANUFACTURER INDICATED THAT MAIN ROTOR/TAIL BOOM CONTACT FROM BLOWBACK OF THE MAIN ROTOR MAY RESULT FROM FORWARD VELOCITY AND LOW/DECAYING MAIN ROTOR RPM (ADVANCE RATIO) DUE TO A HIGH COLLECTIVE POSITION DURING THE GROUND RUN-OUT PHASE FOLLOWING THE 30-KNOT PLUS TOUCHDOWN. THE BLOWBACK CONDITION IS EXACERBATED BY THE HIGH ANGLE PITCH SETTING WHICH CAUSES BLADE STALL OVER A LARGE PORTION OF THE ROTOR DISK. A BLOWBACK CONDITION IS PRESENT IN ALL HELICOPTERS. IT MAY BE MORE PRONOUNCED IN THE MD600N (VERSUS THE 500N) DUE TO GREATER HELICOPTER GROSS WEIGHT, REDUCED FLARE/DECELERATION CAPABILITIES BECAUSE OF TAIL BOOM LENGTH AND INSTALLATION ANGLE, AND THE INCREASED SURFACE OF THE ADDITIONAL MAIN ROTOR BLADE RESULTING IN A MORE RAPID DECAY OF MAIN ROTOR RPM. A CAUTION IN THE HELICOPTER'S ROTORCRAFT FLIGHT MANUAL SPECIFIES FOR PRACTICE AUTOROTATION LANDINGS TO AVOID CONDITIONS OF ROTOR RPM (NR) LESS THAN 60 PERCENT WITH HEADWINDS ACROSS THE ROTOR GREATER THAN 30 KNOTS DURING TOUCHDOWN AUTOROTATIONS. THESE CONDITIONS DURING TOUCHDOWN AND SUBSEQUENT GROUND SLIDE, CAN LEAD TO EXCESSIVE ROTOR BLOWBACK, REDUCTION IN BLADE TIP TO TAIL BOOM CLEARANCE, AND SUBSEQUENT DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT. AVOID THESE CONDITIONS BY REDUCING COLLECTIVE PITCH AFTER TOUCHDOWN (SURFACE CONDITIONS PERMITTING) AND MINIMIZING GROUND RUN.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N606BP · 2
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.