OpenAirDocs.org

20010611023089I

Incident
Open the Markdown

FAA incident report · Cessna 150G · Trilby, FL · June 11, 2001

FAA Aviation Safety Information Portal

© OpenStreetMap
Date
June 11, 2001 · 08:15 local
Place
Trilby, FL
Phase of flight
Normal Cruise
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Aircraft
N2207J
Reported as
Cessna 150G
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
1,330 total160 in this make and model130 in the last 90 days
N2207JRegistered now · Cessna 150GS/N 15065407 · Built 1966Airframe modelCessna 150GEngine modelContinental 0-200 seriesReciprocating

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23)On June 6, 2001, about 0800 hrs. Eastern standard time, a Cessna 150, N2207J, registered tt frederick pishotta, and operated by thomas jorgensen was conducted under part 91. The pilot stated after about 30-40 mins into the flight the engine lost power and a restart was unsuccessful therefore the pilot made an emergency landing in a field. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and a VFR flight plan was not filed. The aircraft was not damaged and the pilot and passenger were not injured.

As the FAA filed it

(-23)ON JUNE 6, 2001, ABOUT 0800 HRS. EASTERN STANDARD TIME, A CESSNA 150, N2207J, REGISTERED TT FREDERICK PISHOTTA, AND OPERATED BY THOMAS JORGENSEN WAS CONDUCTED UNDER PART 91. THE PILOT STATED AFTER ABOUT 30-40 MINS INTO THE FLIGHT THE ENGINE LOST POWER AND A RESTART WAS UNSUCCESSFUL THEREFORE THE PILOT MADE AN EMERGENCY LANDING IN A FIELD. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED AT THE TIME AND A VFR FLIGHT PLAN WAS NOT FILED. THE AIRCRAFT WAS NOT DAMAGED AND THE PILOT AND PASSENGER WERE NOT INJURED.