20011011030599A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Beech 95B55 · Raleigh-Durham, NC · October 11, 2001

Date
October 11, 2001 · 20:30 local
Place
Raleigh-Durham, NC
Airport
Raleigh-Durham International
Phase of flight
Level Off Touchdown
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Operator
FFKA
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N44RA
NTSB investigation
NTSBATL02LA006
Reported as
Beech 95B55
Reported engine
Continental IO470L
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
2,080 total230 in this make and model118 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) Pilot landing at rdu airport after dark and touched down nose first hard, aircraft bounced three times, power was added to salvage landing. Aircraft was taxied to ramp where postflight inspection revealed substantial damage to the airframe (nose buckled/bent forward of windshield), left prop tips bent, skin damage under both wings at engines. (.4) on October 11, 2001, at 2030 eastern daylight time, a Beech BE-55-T42A, N44RA, registered to bellefonte, inc., of Durham, north carolina, bounced three times on the nosewheel during landing at Raleigh-Durham International Airport in Raleigh, north carolina. The repositioning flight was operated under the provisions of title 14 CFR part 91 with an IFR flight plan filed. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The commercial pilot was not injured, and the airplane sustained substantial damage. The flight departed charlotte-douglas international airport in charlotte, north carolina, at 1930.according to the pilot, while conducting a visual approach to runway 23R, "on short final the power was reduced and the nosewheel hit first." He stated that "this was the first of three bounc es each worse than the last." The pilot added power to complete the landing and taxied the airplane to the tie-down area. The post-accident examination of the airplane revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunction nor did the pilot report a mechanical problem with the airplane during the attempted landing. Further examination of the airplane showed that the propeller blade tips of the left propeller and the nose gear had sustained damage. The left engine mount was bent, the fuselage forward of the cabin door showed wrinkling that extended from the windscreen down both sides of the fuselage, and the nose was displaced upward.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) PILOT LANDING AT RDU AIRPORT AFTER DARK AND TOUCHED DOWN NOSE FIRST HARD, AIRCRAFT BOUNCED THREE TIMES, POWER WAS ADDED TO SALVAGE LANDING. AIRCRAFT WAS TAXIED TO RAMP WHERE POSTFLIGHT INSPECTION REVEALED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE TO THE AIRFRAME (NOSE BUCKLED/BENT FORWARD OF WINDSHIELD), LEFT PROP TIPS BENT, SKIN DAMAGE UNDER BOTH WINGS AT ENGINES. (.4) ON OCTOBER 11, 2001, AT 2030 EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME, A BEECH BE-55-T42A, N44RA, REGISTERED TO BELLEFONTE, INC., OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, BOUNCED THREE TIMES ON THE NOSEWHEEL DURING LANDING AT RALEIGH-DURHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT IN RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA. THE REPOSITIONING FLIGHT WAS OPERATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 14 CFR PART 91 WITH AN IFR FLIGHT PLAN FILED. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT. THE COMMERCIAL PILOT WAS NOT INJURED, AND THE AIRPLANE SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE. THE FLIGHT DEPARTED CHARLOTTE-DOUGLAS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT IN CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA, AT 1930.ACCORDING TO THE PILOT, WHILE CONDUCTING A VISUAL APPROACH TO RUNWAY 23R, "ON SHORT FINAL THE POWER WAS REDUCED AND THE NOSEWHEEL HIT FIRST." HE STATED THAT "THIS WAS THE FIRST OF THREE BOUNC ES EACH WORSE THAN THE LAST." THE PILOT ADDED POWER TO COMPLETE THE LANDING AND TAXIED THE AIRPLANE TO THE TIE-DOWN AREA. THE POST-ACCIDENT EXAMINATION OF THE AIRPLANE REVEALED NO EVIDENCE OF MECHANICAL MALFUNCTION NOR DID THE PILOT REPORT A MECHANICAL PROBLEM WITH THE AIRPLANE DURING THE ATTEMPTED LANDING. FURTHER EXAMINATION OF THE AIRPLANE SHOWED THAT THE PROPELLER BLADE TIPS OF THE LEFT PROPELLER AND THE NOSE GEAR HAD SUSTAINED DAMAGE. THE LEFT ENGINE MOUNT WAS BENT, THE FUSELAGE FORWARD OF THE CABIN DOOR SHOWED WRINKLING THAT EXTENDED FROM THE WINDSCREEN DOWN BOTH SIDES OF THE FUSELAGE, AND THE NOSE WAS DISPLACED UPWARD.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.

Other reports on N44RA · 1

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.