What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(.19) On April 3, 2002, about 1030 pacific standard time, a Cessna 172S, N627SP, collided with a taxiway sign during the landing roll at Palm Springs, California. The flight school at Palm Springs was operating the rental airplane under the provisions of 14 CFR part 91. The student pilot, the sole occupant, was not injured; the airplane sustained substantial damage. The personal local fight departed about 1000. Day visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan had been filed. The student was practicing landings on his second supervised solo. He completed five touch-and-go landings and the sixth was to be a full stop landing. During the landing roll, the airplane suddenly veered to the left. The airplane departed the runway, but the student pilot was able to guide it back onto the runway. During the excursion, the airplane collided with a runway edge light and taxiway sign, which resulted in substantial damage to theairframe. The safety board was notified of the accident on April 8, 2002. (-23) student pilot was flying solo, landed aircraft and at that time was going to apply rudder control he inadvertently applied the brakes. This caused the aircraft to veer into some runway lights and sign. The damage to the aircraft was substantial. Lower engine compartment and fire wall were damaged, along with nose wheel cover.
As the FAA filed it
(.19) ON APRIL 3, 2002, ABOUT 1030 PACIFIC STANDARD TIME, A CESSNA 172S, N627SP, COLLIDED WITH A TAXIWAY SIGN DURING THE LANDING ROLL AT PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA. THE FLIGHT SCHOOL AT PALM SPRINGS WAS OPERATING THE RENTAL AIRPLANE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 14 CFR PART 91. THE STUDENT PILOT, THE SOLE OCCUPANT, WAS NOT INJURED; THE AIRPLANE SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE. THE PERSONAL LOCAL FIGHT DEPARTED ABOUT 1000. DAY VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED, AND NO FLIGHT PLAN HAD BEEN FILED. THE STUDENT WAS PRACTICING LANDINGS ON HIS SECOND SUPERVISED SOLO. HE COMPLETED FIVE TOUCH-AND-GO LANDINGS AND THE SIXTH WAS TO BE A FULL STOP LANDING. DURING THE LANDING ROLL, THE AIRPLANE SUDDENLY VEERED TO THE LEFT. THE AIRPLANE DEPARTED THE RUNWAY, BUT THE STUDENT PILOT WAS ABLE TO GUIDE IT BACK ONTO THE RUNWAY. DURING THE EXCURSION, THE AIRPLANE COLLIDED WITH A RUNWAY EDGE LIGHT AND TAXIWAY SIGN, WHICH RESULTED IN SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE TO THEAIRFRAME. THE SAFETY BOARD WAS NOTIFIED OF THE ACCIDENT ON APRIL 8, 2002. (-23) STUDENT PILOT WAS FLYING SOLO, LANDED AIRCRAFT AND AT THAT TIME WAS GOING TO APPLY RUDDER CONTROL HE INADVERTENTLY APPLIED THE BRAKES. THIS CAUSED THE AIRCRAFT TO VEER INTO SOME RUNWAY LIGHTS AND SIGN. THE DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT WAS SUBSTANTIAL. LOWER ENGINE COMPARTMENT AND FIRE WALL WERE DAMAGED, ALONG WITH NOSE WHEEL COVER.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N627SP · 2
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.