20020620035009I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Mooney M20R · Big Bear, CA · June 20, 2002

Date: June 20, 2002 · 19:00 local
Place: Big Bear, CA
Airport: Big Bear City Airport
Phase of flight: Roll-Out (Fixed Wing)
Operating rules: General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage: Minor damage
Aircraft: N214DA
Reported as: Mooney M20R
People aboard: 1
Fatal injuries: 0
Pilot’s flight hours: 550 total20 in this make and model20 in the last 90 days

N214DARegistered now · Mooney M20RS/N 29-0181 · Built 1999 Airframe modelMooney M20R Engine modelContinental IO-550 seriesReciprocating

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) On landing roll the aircraft's left main tire failed. The aircraft settled on the rim, causing the prop to strike the runway. The aircraft was shut down and towed off the runway. There was no other damage to the aircraft and no injuries. High temperatures and a density altitude of about 9500 feet resulted in high ground speeds during landing. This may have contributed to the tire failing. There is no evidence of a violation of the far's. privacy data omitted Thetimes in section 23 are estimates based on available records.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) ON LANDING ROLL THE AIRCRAFT'S LEFT MAIN TIRE FAILED. THE AIRCRAFT SETTLED ON THE RIM, CAUSING THE PROP TO STRIKE THE RUNWAY. THE AIRCRAFT WAS SHUT DOWN AND TOWED OFF THE RUNWAY. THERE WAS NO OTHER DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT AND NO INJURIES. HIGH TEMPERATURES AND A DENSITY ALTITUDE OF ABOUT 9500 FEET RESULTED IN HIGH GROUND SPEEDS DURING LANDING. THIS MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE TIRE FAILING. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF A VIOLATION OF THE FAR'S. ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ THETIMES IN SECTION 23 ARE ESTIMATES BASED ON AVAILABLE RECORDS.