20020922024869A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Cessna 172H · Weed, CA · September 22, 2002

Date
September 22, 2002 · 06:25 local
Place
Weed, CA
Airport
Weed Airport
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N2469L
NTSB investigation
NTSBLAX02LA293
Reported as
Cessna 172H
Fatal injuries
0

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) Aircraft was being hand propped when it got away from the pilot, took off without anyone on board, flew away from the airport and crashed on a highway. (.19) on September 22, 2002, about 0625 pacific daylight time, a Cessna 172H, N2469L, impacted the median area of interstate highway 5, about 0.1 miles northwest of the Weed (uncontrolled) airport, Weed, California. The airplane was substantially damaged. No one was on board the airplane, and no one on the ground was injured. The private pilot, who owned and operated the airplane, reported that he intended to make a personal flight under the provisions of 14 CFR part 91. His destination was fall river mills, California. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed. The pilot stated to the national transportation safety board investigator that when he attempted to start the airplane's engine to initiate the flight he noted that the battery power was low. The propeller would not rotate. The pilot then exited the airplane and rotated the propeller by hand in an effort at starting the engine. The engine started, and the pilot fell to the ground sustaining a minor injury. Thereafter, the runaway airplane departed in a northwesterly direction and flew several hundred feet until crashing into the ground and nosing over. The pilot further stated to the safety board investigator that during the hand propping operation the airplane was not tied down or secured. The pilot also indicated that he believed the engine's throttle was set near the idle position; but he subsequently realized it was at full throttle.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) AIRCRAFT WAS BEING HAND PROPPED WHEN IT GOT AWAY FROM THE PILOT, TOOK OFF WITHOUT ANYONE ON BOARD, FLEW AWAY FROM THE AIRPORT AND CRASHED ON A HIGHWAY. (.19) ON SEPTEMBER 22, 2002, ABOUT 0625 PACIFIC DAYLIGHT TIME, A CESSNA 172H, N2469L, IMPACTED THE MEDIAN AREA OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 5, ABOUT 0.1 MILES NORTHWEST OF THE WEED (UNCONTROLLED) AIRPORT, WEED, CALIFORNIA. THE AIRPLANE WAS SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED. NO ONE WAS ON BOARD THE AIRPLANE, AND NO ONE ON THE GROUND WAS INJURED. THE PRIVATE PILOT, WHO OWNED AND OPERATED THE AIRPLANE, REPORTED THAT HE INTENDED TO MAKE A PERSONAL FLIGHT UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 14 CFR PART 91. HIS DESTINATION WAS FALL RIVER MILLS, CALIFORNIA. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED, AND NO FLIGHT PLAN WAS FILED. THE PILOT STATED TO THE NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD INVESTIGATOR THAT WHEN HE ATTEMPTED TO START THE AIRPLANE'S ENGINE TO INITIATE THE FLIGHT HE NOTED THAT THE BATTERY POWER WAS LOW. THE PROPELLER WOULD NOT ROTATE. THE PILOT THEN EXITED THE AIRPLANE AND ROTATED THE PROPELLER BY HAND IN AN EFFORT AT STARTING THE ENGINE. THE ENGINE STARTED, AND THE PILOT FELL TO THE GROUND SUSTAINING A MINOR INJURY. THEREAFTER, THE RUNAWAY AIRPLANE DEPARTED IN A NORTHWESTERLY DIRECTION AND FLEW SEVERAL HUNDRED FEET UNTIL CRASHING INTO THE GROUND AND NOSING OVER. THE PILOT FURTHER STATED TO THE SAFETY BOARD INVESTIGATOR THAT DURING THE HAND PROPPING OPERATION THE AIRPLANE WAS NOT TIED DOWN OR SECURED. THE PILOT ALSO INDICATED THAT HE BELIEVED THE ENGINE'S THROTTLE WAS SET NEAR THE IDLE POSITION; BUT HE SUBSEQUENTLY REALIZED IT WAS AT FULL THROTTLE.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.