20030118035279A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Piper PA-28-180 · Poughkeepsie, NY · January 18, 2003

Date
January 18, 2003 · 12:10 local
Place
Poughkeepsie, NY
Airport
Dutchess County
Phase of flight
Level Off Touchdown
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N5136L
NTSB investigation
NTSBNYC03LA041
Reported as
Piper PA28180
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
265 total144 in this make and model7 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) During landing, the aircraft contacted snow covered dirt ground approximately fifty (50) feet short of runway 24. The initial contact was by the aircraft's main gears and subsequent rapid pitch down of the aircraft's nose, caused the nose gear to impact the soft ground hard and portions of it to separate from the airframe. The aircraft continued to slide onto the runway and came to rest adjacent to the runway number. The aircraft sustained substantial damage to the airframe's firewall. The aircraft was operated under the provisions of 14 CFR 91, visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and a visual flight rule (VFR) flight plan was not filed. The pilot in command (PIC) stated that during his approach to runway 24, he was too high and decided to retard the throttle to idle approach to increase the descent rate. As he approached the runway, the rapid sink rate caused him to come up short of the runway's threshold, so he applied power, but the engine was slow to respond, hesitated, and eventually power output was regained. At this time, the aircraft could not recover from the excessive loss of altitude and contacted the ground.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) DURING LANDING, THE AIRCRAFT CONTACTED SNOW COVERED DIRT GROUND APPROXIMATELY FIFTY (50) FEET SHORT OF RUNWAY 24. THE INITIAL CONTACT WAS BY THE AIRCRAFT'S MAIN GEARS AND SUBSEQUENT RAPID PITCH DOWN OF THE AIRCRAFT'S NOSE, CAUSED THE NOSE GEAR TO IMPACT THE SOFT GROUND HARD AND PORTIONS OF IT TO SEPARATE FROM THE AIRFRAME. THE AIRCRAFT CONTINUED TO SLIDE ONTO THE RUNWAY AND CAME TO REST ADJACENT TO THE RUNWAY NUMBER. THE AIRCRAFT SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE TO THE AIRFRAME'S FIREWALL. THE AIRCRAFT WAS OPERATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 14 CFR 91, VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED, AND A VISUAL FLIGHT RULE (VFR) FLIGHT PLAN WAS NOT FILED. THE PILOT IN COMMAND (PIC) STATED THAT DURING HIS APPROACH TO RUNWAY 24, HE WAS TOO HIGH AND DECIDED TO RETARD THE THROTTLE TO IDLE APPROACH TO INCREASE THE DESCENT RATE. AS HE APPROACHED THE RUNWAY, THE RAPID SINK RATE CAUSED HIM TO COME UP SHORT OF THE RUNWAY'S THRESHOLD, SO HE APPLIED POWER, BUT THE ENGINE WAS SLOW TO RESPOND, HESITATED, AND EVENTUALLY POWER OUTPUT WAS REGAINED. AT THIS TIME, THE AIRCRAFT COULD NOT RECOVER FROM THE EXCESSIVE LOSS OF ALTITUDE AND CONTACTED THE GROUND.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.