What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) During a commercial pilot certification practical test the pilot, Mr. Lund, failed to lower the landing gear before landing. The pilot and the examiner state that the presence of another aircraft in the pattern, that they had been cleared to land behind, was a distraction. They state that they had to extend the down wind to accomodate the other aircraft and that the final decision to land came very close to the touch down due to concern as to whether or not the aircraft in front of them was going to be clear of the runway. Mr. Lund determined that the aircraft in front of them had cleared the runway and proceeded to land. Both the pilot and the examiner state that the gear horn failed to sound. Minor damage to the aircraft was the result of the gear up landing.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) DURING A COMMERCIAL PILOT CERTIFICATION PRACTICAL TEST THE PILOT, MR. LUND, FAILED TO LOWER THE LANDING GEAR BEFORE LANDING. THE PILOT AND THE EXAMINER STATE THAT THE PRESENCE OF ANOTHER AIRCRAFT IN THE PATTERN, THAT THEY HAD BEEN CLEARED TO LAND BEHIND, WAS A DISTRACTION. THEY STATE THAT THEY HAD TO EXTEND THE DOWN WIND TO ACCOMODATE THE OTHER AIRCRAFT AND THAT THE FINAL DECISION TO LAND CAME VERY CLOSE TO THE TOUCH DOWN DUE TO CONCERN AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THE AIRCRAFT IN FRONT OF THEM WAS GOING TO BE CLEAR OF THE RUNWAY. MR. LUND DETERMINED THAT THE AIRCRAFT IN FRONT OF THEM HAD CLEARED THE RUNWAY AND PROCEEDED TO LAND. BOTH THE PILOT AND THE EXAMINER STATE THAT THE GEAR HORN FAILED TO SOUND. MINOR DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT WAS THE RESULT OF THE GEAR UP LANDING.