20040315004079A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Cessna 182P · Monticello, UT · March 15, 2004

Date
March 15, 2004 · 17:30 local
Place
Monticello, UT
Phase of flight
Forced/Precautionary Landing
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N400DH
NTSB investigation
NTSBDEN04LA052
Reported as
Cessna 182P
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
3,000 total2,600 in this make and model75 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) While attempting to land airplane hit ground short of runway. Block 18;20;29;31;32;42;43 are incomplete and an amended report will be filed. (-23 amendment) pilot and his passenger (son) landed at an unimproved dirt strip in southern Utah for recreation. After a few minutes of looking around they decided to take-off. The strip was very rough and in poor condition creating unanticipated drag which significantly increased the take-off distance. Pilot stated that just prior to rotation he went over a small dirt bump which prematurely made the aircraft go airborne. By the time this occurred there was not enough runway remaining to settle back to the runway to gain more airspeed. The runway ran uphill and before the pilot could gain adequate airspeed and lift the aircraft settled into some small trees and crashed. The winds in the area were gusty and the direction was variable. The take-off uphill was into the wind at first but the pilot stated it switched to perhaps a tailwind. The wind and condition of the dirt strip combined to make the take-off end as an accident. The helcopter pilot who arrived within a couple of hours of the accident stated the winds in the area that day were very gusty and constantly switching directions. Due to the pilots extensive backcountry airstrip experience without prior accidents it was decided counseling was appropriate action.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) WHILE ATTEMPTING TO LAND AIRPLANE HIT GROUND SHORT OF RUNWAY. BLOCK 18;20;29;31;32;42;43 ARE INCOMPLETE AND AN AMENDED REPORT WILL BE FILED. (-23 AMENDMENT) PILOT AND HIS PASSENGER (SON) LANDED AT AN UNIMPROVED DIRT STRIP IN SOUTHERN UTAH FOR RECREATION. AFTER A FEW MINUTES OF LOOKING AROUND THEY DECIDED TO TAKE-OFF. THE STRIP WAS VERY ROUGH AND IN POOR CONDITION CREATING UNANTICIPATED DRAG WHICH SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED THE TAKE-OFF DISTANCE. PILOT STATED THAT JUST PRIOR TO ROTATION HE WENT OVER A SMALL DIRT BUMP WHICH PREMATURELY MADE THE AIRCRAFT GO AIRBORNE. BY THE TIME THIS OCCURRED THERE WAS NOT ENOUGH RUNWAY REMAINING TO SETTLE BACK TO THE RUNWAY TO GAIN MORE AIRSPEED. THE RUNWAY RAN UPHILL AND BEFORE THE PILOT COULD GAIN ADEQUATE AIRSPEED AND LIFT THE AIRCRAFT SETTLED INTO SOME SMALL TREES AND CRASHED. THE WINDS IN THE AREA WERE GUSTY AND THE DIRECTION WAS VARIABLE. THE TAKE-OFF UPHILL WAS INTO THE WIND AT FIRST BUT THE PILOT STATED IT SWITCHED TO PERHAPS A TAILWIND. THE WIND AND CONDITION OF THE DIRT STRIP COMBINED TO MAKE THE TAKE-OFF END AS AN ACCIDENT. THE HELCOPTER PILOT WHO ARRIVED WITHIN A COUPLE OF HOURS OF THE ACCIDENT STATED THE WINDS IN THE AREA THAT DAY WERE VERY GUSTY AND CONSTANTLY SWITCHING DIRECTIONS. DUE TO THE PILOTS EXTENSIVE BACKCOUNTRY AIRSTRIP EXPERIENCE WITHOUT PRIOR ACCIDENTS IT WAS DECIDED COUNSELING WAS APPROPRIATE ACTION.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.

Other reports on N400DH · 1

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.