20040808019129I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Cessna 172RG · Boise, ID · August 8, 2004

Date
August 8, 2004 · 17:50 local
Place
Boise, ID
Airport
Boise Air Terminal - Gowen Fld
Phase of flight
Roll-Out (Fixed Wing)
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N6428V
Reported as
Cessna 172RG
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
990 total20 in this make and model120 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) During a landing rollout, at Gowen field, the nose gear of N6428V collapsed. The aircraft sustained minor damage, including prop tip curling and surface abrasion to the aircraft's forward lower fuselage. The aircraft's gear was manually and electrically extended following a post incident inspection, and both systems operated correctly without any maintenance irregularity. The logbooks also, did not indicate any previous history of gear malfunction or recent maintenance which could attribute to the unwarranted nose-gear retraction. Evidence strongly indicates that the commercial student, while receiving flight instruction on soft-field takeoffs and landings in a complex aircraft, inadvertently raised the gear lever instead of the flaps. The CFI failed to prevent the student from raising the gear. privacy data omitted

As the FAA filed it

(-23) DURING A LANDING ROLLOUT, AT GOWEN FIELD, THE NOSE GEAR OF N6428V COLLAPSED. THE AIRCRAFT SUSTAINED MINOR DAMAGE, INCLUDING PROP TIP CURLING AND SURFACE ABRASION TO THE AIRCRAFT'S FORWARD LOWER FUSELAGE. THE AIRCRAFT'S GEAR WAS MANUALLY AND ELECTRICALLY EXTENDED FOLLOWING A POST INCIDENT INSPECTION, AND BOTH SYSTEMS OPERATED CORRECTLY WITHOUT ANY MAINTENANCE IRREGULARITY. THE LOGBOOKS ALSO, DID NOT INDICATE ANY PREVIOUS HISTORY OF GEAR MALFUNCTION OR RECENT MAINTENANCE WHICH COULD ATTRIBUTE TO THE UNWARRANTED NOSE-GEAR RETRACTION. EVIDENCE STRONGLY INDICATES THAT THE COMMERCIAL STUDENT, WHILE RECEIVING FLIGHT INSTRUCTION ON SOFT-FIELD TAKEOFFS AND LANDINGS IN A COMPLEX AIRCRAFT, INADVERTENTLY RAISED THE GEAR LEVER INSTEAD OF THE FLAPS. THE CFI FAILED TO PREVENT THE STUDENT FROM RAISING THE GEAR. ^PRIVACY DATA OMITT^

Other reports on N6428V · 2

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.