What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) The student pilot began receiving flight instruction in August. After his fifth supervised solo flight in the Cessna 172, an FBO employee noted a knot on the side of the nose tire. Further investigation disclosed damage to the nose gear support structure. Even though the student pilot performed the last two flights of the aircraft, it is unknown when the damage to the aircraft actually occurred. According to the owner of the FBO, if his employee had not noticed the knot on the tire, the damage to the nose gear support structure would have been hard to see as it was inside the engine cowling. privacy data omitted
As the FAA filed it
(-23) THE STUDENT PILOT BEGAN RECEIVING FLIGHT INSTRUCTION IN AUGUST. AFTER HIS FIFTH SUPERVISED SOLO FLIGHT IN THE CESSNA 172, AN FBO EMPLOYEE NOTED A KNOT ON THE SIDE OF THE NOSE TIRE. FURTHER INVESTIGATION DISCLOSED DAMAGE TO THE NOSE GEAR SUPPORT STRUCTURE. EVEN THOUGH THE STUDENT PILOT PERFORMED THE LAST TWO FLIGHTS OF THE AIRCRAFT, IT IS UNKNOWN WHEN THE DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT ACTUALLY OCCURRED. ACCORDING TO THE OWNER OF THE FBO, IF HIS EMPLOYEE HAD NOT NOTICED THE KNOT ON THE TIRE, THE DAMAGE TO THE NOSE GEAR SUPPORT STRUCTURE WOULD HAVE BEEN HARD TO SEE AS IT WAS INSIDE THE ENGINE COWLING. ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^