20050106000179I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Cessna T210L · Yuma, AZ · January 6, 2005

Date
January 6, 2005 · 14:30 local
Place
Yuma, AZ
Airport
Yuma Mcas - Yuma International
Phase of flight
Sfl Final Approach
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N59041
Reported as
Cessna T210L
Reported engine
Lycoming IO540*
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
6,444 total150 in this make and model54 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) Pilot ^privac^ stated that he was directed to execute a simulated engine inoperative (power off) landing by flight instructor ^priva^ during the flight review required by 14 CFR 61.56. Pilot ^privac^ said that they were too low to extend wing flaps and the landing was made without flaps. He said that the nose landing gear, landing gear doors and propeller were damaged during the landing. Instructor ^priva^ said that his attention was distracted by air traffic and that the aircraft quit flying about six inches above the runway. He said that the landing was firm, but not unusually hard. Instructor ^priva^ said that as the aircraft nose came down, it continued all the way to the ground. He said that the aircraft is equipped with a stol (short takeoff and landing) kit and he did not know it that, combined with the no flap landing contributed to the incident. privacy data omitted Director of maintenance for sun western flyers inspected the aircraft. He stated that the aircraft hit so hard that the nose landing gear locks were bent and broken. Additionally, he said that the hard landing bent the right main landing gear leg.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) PILOT ^PRIVAC^ STATED THAT HE WAS DIRECTED TO EXECUTE A SIMULATED ENGINE INOPERATIVE (POWER OFF) LANDING BY FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR ^PRIVA^ DURING THE FLIGHT REVIEW REQUIRED BY 14 CFR 61.56. PILOT ^PRIVAC^ SAID THAT THEY WERE TOO LOW TO EXTEND WING FLAPS AND THE LANDING WAS MADE WITHOUT FLAPS. HE SAID THAT THE NOSE LANDING GEAR, LANDING GEAR DOORS AND PROPELLER WERE DAMAGED DURING THE LANDING. INSTRUCTOR ^PRIVA^ SAID THAT HIS ATTENTION WAS DISTRACTED BY AIR TRAFFIC AND THAT THE AIRCRAFT QUIT FLYING ABOUT SIX INCHES ABOVE THE RUNWAY. HE SAID THAT THE LANDING WAS FIRM, BUT NOT UNUSUALLY HARD. INSTRUCTOR ^PRIVA^ SAID THAT AS THE AIRCRAFT NOSE CAME DOWN, IT CONTINUED ALL THE WAY TO THE GROUND. HE SAID THAT THE AIRCRAFT IS EQUIPPED WITH A STOL (SHORT TAKEOFF AND LANDING) KIT AND HE DID NOT KNOW IT THAT, COMBINED WITH THE NO FLAP LANDING CONTRIBUTED TO THE INCIDENT. ^PRIVACY DATA ^ DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE FOR SUN WESTERN FLYERS INSPECTED THE AIRCRAFT. HE STATED THAT THE AIRCRAFT HIT SO HARD THAT THE NOSE LANDING GEAR LOCKS WERE BENT AND BROKEN. ADDITIONALLY, HE SAID THAT THE HARD LANDING BENT THE RIGHT MAIN LANDING GEAR LEG.

Other reports on N59041 · 2

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.