What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) Pilot aborted a visual approach after losing visual reference to the airport due to thunderstorm over airport. He executed a missed approach and requested vectors for a GPS 24 approach. After turning on to final, the pilot reduced the airspeed to vref of 108 kst. And selected landing flaps. After touchdown, pilot applied brakes and had no braking action. After rolling more than a third down the runway with no braking action, the pilot applied max power to attempt to go airborne, by the time the engines spooled up, the aircraft had departed off the end of the runway and came to rest in an area of tall weeds and shrubs in deep mud. The nose gear was torn off the aircraft. Other damage to the aircraft included both wings and flaps, both main landing gears, the nose section, and the forward left side of the fuselage. The aircraft is considered a total loss.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) PILOT ABORTED A VISUAL APPROACH AFTER LOSING VISUAL REFERENCE TO THE AIRPORT DUE TO THUNDERSTORM OVER AIRPORT. HE EXECUTED A MISSED APPROACH AND REQUESTED VECTORS FOR A GPS 24 APPROACH. AFTER TURNING ON TO FINAL, THE PILOT REDUCED THE AIRSPEED TO VREF OF 108 KST. AND SELECTED LANDING FLAPS. AFTER TOUCHDOWN, PILOT APPLIED BRAKES AND HAD NO BRAKING ACTION. AFTER ROLLING MORE THAN A THIRD DOWN THE RUNWAY WITH NO BRAKING ACTION, THE PILOT APPLIED MAX POWER TO ATTEMPT TO GO AIRBORNE, BY THE TIME THE ENGINES SPOOLED UP, THE AIRCRAFT HAD DEPARTED OFF THE END OF THE RUNWAY AND CAME TO REST IN AN AREA OF TALL WEEDS AND SHRUBS IN DEEP MUD. THE NOSE GEAR WAS TORN OFF THE AIRCRAFT. OTHER DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT INCLUDED BOTH WINGS AND FLAPS, BOTH MAIN LANDING GEARS, THE NOSE SECTION, AND THE FORWARD LEFT SIDE OF THE FUSELAGE. THE AIRCRAFT IS CONSIDERED A TOTAL LOSS.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.