What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) The pilot attempted a landing at schaumburg airport and found the nose landing gear would not extend. Several attempts were made to cycle the gear, however the control tower stated the nose gear was not down. The pilot then diverted to Dupage Airport, and following the same routine, the tower advised him that the nose gear doors were partially open, but the gear was still not down. The pilot then retracted the main landing gear and made a successful gear up landing. No injuries resulted from the incident.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) THE PILOT ATTEMPTED A LANDING AT SCHAUMBURG AIRPORT AND FOUND THE NOSE LANDING GEAR WOULD NOT EXTEND. SEVERAL ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO CYCLE THE GEAR, HOWEVER THE CONTROL TOWER STATED THE NOSE GEAR WAS NOT DOWN. THE PILOT THEN DIVERTED TO DUPAGE AIRPORT, AND FOLLOWING THE SAME ROUTINE, THE TOWER ADVISED HIM THAT THE NOSE GEAR DOORS WERE PARTIALLY OPEN, BUT THE GEAR WAS STILL NOT DOWN. THE PILOT THEN RETRACTED THE MAIN LANDING GEAR AND MADE A SUCCESSFUL GEAR UP LANDING. NO INJURIES RESULTED FROM THE INCIDENT.