20050831022569A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Cessna 182R · New Ulm, MN · August 31, 2005

Date
August 31, 2005 · 10:00 local
Place
New Ulm, MN
Airport
New Ulm Municipal Airport
Phase of flight
Forced/Precautionary Landing
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N505NR
NTSB investigation
NTSBCHI05TA251
Reported as
Cessna 182R
Reported engine
Continental IO470F
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
1,400 total350 in this make and model87 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) The aircraft lost power, following take-off and made a forced landing off airport. Cannot make a positive determination as to why the aircraft sustained fuel starvation. The engine was thoroughly inspected for all system continuity. The engine was primed and run with no defects noted. The possibility of the fuel selector valve being in the off position and not noticed by the pilot due to a large case used for the storagae of maps and charts and other equipment obstructed his view. Pilot stated that he thought he had checked the position. This aircraft had an engine conversion which required the installation of a "header tank" in the cabin. The quantity of the tank would have been sufficient for a taxi and run-up then on climbout, been depleted. The pilot stated that "the fuel selector valve was cycled to all positions" with no luck.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) THE AIRCRAFT LOST POWER, FOLLOWING TAKE-OFF AND MADE A FORCED LANDING OFF AIRPORT. CANNOT MAKE A POSITIVE DETERMINATION AS TO WHY THE AIRCRAFT SUSTAINED FUEL STARVATION. THE ENGINE WAS THOROUGHLY INSPECTED FOR ALL SYSTEM CONTINUITY. THE ENGINE WAS PRIMED AND RUN WITH NO DEFECTS NOTED. THE POSSIBILITY OF THE FUEL SELECTOR VALVE BEING IN THE OFF POSITION AND NOT NOTICED BY THE PILOT DUE TO A LARGE CASE USED FOR THE STORAGAE OF MAPS AND CHARTS AND OTHER EQUIPMENT OBSTRUCTED HIS VIEW. PILOT STATED THAT HE THOUGHT HE HAD CHECKED THE POSITION. THIS AIRCRAFT HAD AN ENGINE CONVERSION WHICH REQUIRED THE INSTALLATION OF A "HEADER TANK" IN THE CABIN. THE QUANTITY OF THE TANK WOULD HAVE BEEN SUFFICIENT FOR A TAXI AND RUN-UP THEN ON CLIMBOUT, BEEN DEPLETED. THE PILOT STATED THAT "THE FUEL SELECTOR VALVE WAS CYCLED TO ALL POSITIONS" WITH NO LUCK.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.