20060212001959A

Accident · Destroyed

FAA accident report · Cessna 210M · Long Beach, CA · February 12, 2006

Date
February 12, 2006 · 16:15 local
Place
Long Beach, CA
Phase of flight
Landing
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Destroyed
Aircraft
N6895B
NTSB investigation
NTSBLAX06FA113
Reported as
Cessna 210M
Reported engine
Continental IO520*
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
4,500 total0 in this make and model0 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) Two dock workers witnessed the aircraft attempt to make an emergency landing on the pier, and pulled the pilot from the wreckage. Neither recalls hearing any engine noise. Condition of propeller indicates the engine was not developing power. Although there was some fuel spillage, it was not substantial. Unable to dip the tanks due to the extent of damage and attitude of the wings. NTSB will further determine and check fuel condition in engine. The pilot attempted to glide between two conex containers (shipping, rail containers) which were stacked two high. The forward portion of the fuselage and wings cleared the containers, however there is substantial evidence that the left flap (which was retracted) struck the top of one container, then the aft portion of the fuselage and the left horizontal stabilizer impacted lower on the container, separating the entire empennage aft of the cabin area. The prop, engine and cabin portion impacted the ground then slid about 25 yards where they impacted more containers which were stacked five high.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) TWO DOCK WORKERS WITNESSED THE AIRCRAFT ATTEMPT TO MAKE AN EMERGENCY LANDING ON THE PIER, AND PULLED THE PILOT FROM THE WRECKAGE. NEITHER RECALLS HEARING ANY ENGINE NOISE. CONDITION OF PROPELLER INDICATES THE ENGINE WAS NOT DEVELOPING POWER. ALTHOUGH THERE WAS SOME FUEL SPILLAGE, IT WAS NOT SUBSTANTIAL. UNABLE TO DIP THE TANKS DUE TO THE EXTENT OF DAMAGE AND ATTITUDE OF THE WINGS. NTSB WILL FURTHER DETERMINE AND CHECK FUEL CONDITION IN ENGINE. THE PILOT ATTEMPTED TO GLIDE BETWEEN TWO CONEX CONTAINERS (SHIPPING, RAIL CONTAINERS) WHICH WERE STACKED TWO HIGH. THE FORWARD PORTION OF THE FUSELAGE AND WINGS CLEARED THE CONTAINERS, HOWEVER THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT THE LEFT FLAP (WHICH WAS RETRACTED) STRUCK THE TOP OF ONE CONTAINER, THEN THE AFT PORTION OF THE FUSELAGE AND THE LEFT HORIZONTAL STABILIZER IMPACTED LOWER ON THE CONTAINER, SEPARATING THE ENTIRE EMPENNAGE AFT OF THE CABIN AREA. THE PROP, ENGINE AND CABIN PORTION IMPACTED THE GROUND THEN SLID ABOUT 25 YARDS WHERE THEY IMPACTED MORE CONTAINERS WHICH WERE STACKED FIVE HIGH.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.

Other reports on N6895B · 1

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.