What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) Per the pilot "the aircraft made an uneventful landing on runway 06 at Teterboro. The crew's day started at 1500 CDT and they departed ksus for kteb at 1800CDT. The pilot was instructed to taxi to the end of the runway for a left turn. The "e" mass appeared to be pavement with the red lights past the "e" mass being the end of the runway. There were no markings on the "e" mass to indicate otherwise. As the taxi onto the "e" mass continued the nose wheel began to indicate a sound that there was a problem. As soon as the main gear rolled on the "e" mass it was evident that there's not normal pavement below the wheels. The airport ground charts were out in the cockpit at the time of this occurrence. The aircraft came to rest 81.5 feet from the end of the runway white stripe. Approximately 37.0 feet of "e" mass was damaged. There did not appear to be any damage to the aircraft on my initial inspection. The aircraft manufacturer's rep will look at the aircraft on 10/26/2006, to confirm this. On 10/27/2006 spoke to the Bombardier representative he stated "the aircraft was not damaged during this incident."
As the FAA filed it
(-23) PER THE PILOT "THE AIRCRAFT MADE AN UNEVENTFUL LANDING ON RUNWAY 06 AT TETERBORO. THE CREW'S DAY STARTED AT 1500 CDT AND THEY DEPARTED KSUS FOR KTEB AT 1800CDT. THE PILOT WAS INSTRUCTED TO TAXI TO THE END OF THE RUNWAY FOR A LEFT TURN. THE "E" MASS APPEARED TO BE PAVEMENT WITH THE RED LIGHTS PAST THE "E" MASS BEING THE END OF THE RUNWAY. THERE WERE NO MARKINGS ON THE "E" MASS TO INDICATE OTHERWISE. AS THE TAXI ONTO THE "E" MASS CONTINUED THE NOSE WHEEL BEGAN TO INDICATE A SOUND THAT THERE WAS A PROBLEM. AS SOON AS THE MAIN GEAR ROLLED ON THE "E" MASS IT WAS EVIDENT THAT THERE'S NOT NORMAL PAVEMENT BELOW THE WHEELS. THE AIRPORT GROUND CHARTS WERE OUT IN THE COCKPIT AT THE TIME OF THIS OCCURRENCE. THE AIRCRAFT CAME TO REST 81.5 FEET FROM THE END OF THE RUNWAY WHITE STRIPE. APPROXIMATELY 37.0 FEET OF "E" MASS WAS DAMAGED. THERE DID NOT APPEAR TO BE ANY DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT ON MY INITIAL INSPECTION. THE AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURER'S REP WILL LOOK AT THE AIRCRAFT ON 10/26/2006, TO CONFIRM THIS. ON 10/27/2006 SPOKE TO THE BOMBARDIER REPRESENTATIVE HE STATED "THE AIRCRAFT WAS NOT DAMAGED DURING THIS INCIDENT."