20061029026639A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Cessna 150H · Monroe City, IN · October 29, 2006

Date
October 29, 2006 · 14:41 local
Place
Monroe City, IN
Phase of flight
Touch And Go Landing
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N23175
NTSB investigation
NTSBCHI07LA010
Reported as
Cessna 150H
Reported engine
Lycoming O320E2D
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s certificate
Student
Pilot’s flight hours
107 total98 in this make and model23 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) privacy data omitted a student pilot asked privacy data omitted to accompany him as a safety pilot so that he could practice instrument flight maneuvers. Apparently, the student pilot privacy data omitted had failed this portion of his private pilot check ride. It should be noted that according to FAA records, the pilot's privacy data omitted commercial and CFI pilot certificates have been cancelled and his last medical was denied, possibly on or about 05/04/87. Apparently, after 30-40 minutes of instrument flight, privacy data omitted simulated an engine failure at approximately 3,000'MSL above an ultra-light flying field. The pilot privacy data omitted spiraled down to the field, made his approach and accomplished a balked landing at approximately 100'MSL. After climbout, a second forced landing was simulated at which time privacy data omitted had the pilot privacy data omitted descend below 100'MSL and actually touch down. On climb out from the attempted touch and go, the aircraft did not clear the treeline at the east end of the field. Upon contact with the first tree, the aircraft flat spun to the left, contacting two more large trees and slid to the forest floor. There was no post impact fire. The aircraft received substantial damage. The pilot privacy data omitted and privacy data omitted sustained minor injuries.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ A STUDENT PILOT ASKED ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ TO ACCOMPANY HIM AS A SAFETY PILOT SO THAT HE COULD PRACTICE INSTRUMENT FLIGHT MANEUVERS. APPARENTLY, THE STUDENT PILOT ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ HAD FAILED THIS PORTION OF HIS PRIVATE PILOT CHECK RIDE. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT ACCORDING TO FAA RECORDS, THE PILOT'S ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ COMMERCIAL AND CFI PILOT CERTIFICATES HAVE BEEN CANCELLED AND HIS LAST MEDICAL WAS DENIED, POSSIBLY ON OR ABOUT 05/04/87. APPARENTLY, AFTER 30-40 MINUTES OF INSTRUMENT FLIGHT, ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ SIMULATED AN ENGINE FAILURE AT APPROXIMATELY 3,000'MSL ABOVE AN ULTRA-LIGHT FLYING FIELD. THE PILOT ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ SPIRALED DOWN TO THE FIELD, MADE HIS APPROACH AND ACCOMPLISHED A BALKED LANDING AT APPROXIMATELY 100'MSL. AFTER CLIMBOUT, A SECOND FORCED LANDING WAS SIMULATED AT WHICH TIME ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ HAD THE PILOT ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ DESCEND BELOW 100'MSL AND ACTUALLY TOUCH DOWN. ON CLIMB OUT FROM THE ATTEMPTED TOUCH AND GO, THE AIRCRAFT DID NOT CLEAR THE TREELINE AT THE EAST END OF THE FIELD. UPON CONTACT WITH THE FIRST TREE, THE AIRCRAFT FLAT SPUN TO THE LEFT, CONTACTING TWO MORE LARGE TREES AND SLID TO THE FOREST FLOOR. THERE WAS NO POST IMPACT FIRE. THE AIRCRAFT RECEIVED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE. THE PILOT ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ AND ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ SUSTAINED MINOR INJURIES.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.